sales-engineer by alirezarezvani/claude-skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill sales-engineer目标: 理解客户需求、技术环境和业务驱动力。
检查清单:
工具: 运行 rfp_response_analyzer.py 来评分初始需求匹配度。
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json > phase1_rfp_results.json
输出: 技术发现文档、需求映射、初始覆盖度评估。
验证检查点: 覆盖率分数必须 >50% 且必备需求缺口 ≤3 才能进入第二阶段。使用以下命令检查:
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json | python -c "import sys,json; r=json.load(sys.stdin); print('PROCEED' if r['coverage_score']>50 and r['must_have_gaps']<=3 else 'REVIEW')"
设计一个满足客户需求的解决方案架构。
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
检查清单:
工具: 使用第一阶段数据运行 competitive_matrix_builder.py 来识别差异点和薄弱环节。
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json > phase2_competitive.json
python -c "import json; d=json.load(open('phase2_competitive.json')); print('Differentiators:', d['differentiators']); print('Vulnerabilities:', d['vulnerabilities'])"
输出: 解决方案架构、竞争定位、技术差异化策略。
验证检查点: 在进入第三阶段前,确认每个客户优先级至少存在一个强有力的差异点。如果未找到差异点,则上报至产品团队(参见集成点)。
目标: 根据利益相关者的优先级,交付有说服力的技术演示。
检查清单:
模板: 使用 assets/demo_script_template.md 进行结构化的演示准备。
输出: 定制化演示、针对特定利益相关者的讲解要点、反馈记录。
验证检查点: 演示脚本在交付前必须覆盖 phase1_rfp_results.json 中标记的每一个必备需求。使用以下命令交叉引用:
python -c "import json; rfp=json.load(open('phase1_rfp_results.json')); [print('UNCOVERED:', r) for r in rfp['must_have_requirements'] if r['coverage']=='Gap']"
目标: 执行结构化的概念验证,以验证解决方案。
检查清单:
工具: 运行 poc_planner.py 以生成完整的概念验证计划。
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json > phase4_poc_plan.json
python -c "import json; p=json.load(open('phase4_poc_plan.json')); print('Go/No-Go:', p['recommendation'])"
模板: 使用 assets/poc_scorecard_template.md 进行评估跟踪。
输出: 概念验证计划、评估记分卡、执行/不执行建议。
验证检查点: 概念验证转化要求记分卡在所有评估维度(功能性、性能、集成、易用性、支持)上的得分 >60%。如果得分 <60%,记录差距并循环回到第二阶段进行解决方案重新设计。
目标: 交付支持商业成交的技术提案。
检查清单:
模板: 使用 assets/technical_proposal_template.md 作为提案文档。
输出: 技术提案、实施时间线、风险缓解计划。
脚本: scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py
目的: 解析 RFP/RFI 需求,评分覆盖度,识别差距,并生成投标/不投标建议。
覆盖度类别: 完全覆盖 (100%)、部分覆盖 (50%)、计划覆盖 (25%)、缺口 (0%)。
优先级加权: 必备需求 3×、应有需求 2×、可有可无需求 1×。
投标/不投标逻辑:
用法:
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json # 人类可读格式
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json # JSON 输出格式
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py --help
输入格式: 完整模式请参见 assets/sample_rfp_data.json。
脚本: scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py
目的: 生成功能对比矩阵,计算竞争分数,识别差异点和薄弱环节。
功能评分: 完全支持 (3)、部分支持 (2)、有限支持 (1)、不支持 (0)。
用法:
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json # 人类可读格式
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json # JSON 输出格式
输出包括: 功能对比矩阵、加权竞争分数、差异点、薄弱环节和制胜主题。
脚本: scripts/poc_planner.py
目的: 生成结构化的概念验证计划,包含时间线、资源分配、成功标准和评估记分卡。
默认阶段划分:
用法:
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json # 人类可读格式
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json # JSON 输出格式
输出包括: 分阶段概念验证计划、资源分配、成功标准、评估记分卡、风险登记册和执行/不执行建议框架。
| 参考 | 描述 |
|---|---|
references/rfp-response-guide.md | RFP/RFI 响应最佳实践、合规性矩阵、投标/不投标框架 |
references/competitive-positioning-framework.md | 竞争分析方法论、作战卡创建、异议处理 |
references/poc-best-practices.md | 概念验证规划方法论、成功标准、评估框架 |
| 模板 | 用途 |
|---|---|
assets/technical_proposal_template.md | 包含执行摘要、解决方案架构、实施计划的技术提案 |
assets/demo_script_template.md | 包含议程、讲解要点、异议处理的演示脚本 |
assets/poc_scorecard_template.md | 包含加权评分的概念验证评估记分卡 |
assets/sample_rfp_data.json | 用于测试分析器的示例 RFP 数据 |
assets/expected_output.json | rfp_response_analyzer.py 的预期输出 |
../../marketing-skill/ 的竞争情报和消息框架../../product-team/../../c-level-advisor/../customer-success-manager/最后更新: 2026年2月 状态: 生产就绪 工具: 3 个 Python 自动化脚本 参考: 3 个知识库文档 模板: 5 个资产文件
每周安装量
107
代码仓库
GitHub 星标数
6.9K
首次出现
2026年2月6日
安全审计
已安装于
claude-code88
gemini-cli87
codex85
opencode84
cursor80
github-copilot79
Objective: Understand customer requirements, technical environment, and business drivers.
Checklist:
Tools: Run rfp_response_analyzer.py to score initial requirement alignment.
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json > phase1_rfp_results.json
Output: Technical discovery document, requirement map, initial coverage assessment.
Validation checkpoint: Coverage score must be >50% and must-have gaps ≤3 before proceeding to Phase 2. Check with:
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json | python -c "import sys,json; r=json.load(sys.stdin); print('PROCEED' if r['coverage_score']>50 and r['must_have_gaps']<=3 else 'REVIEW')"
Objective: Design a solution architecture that addresses customer requirements.
Checklist:
Tools: Run competitive_matrix_builder.py using Phase 1 data to identify differentiators and vulnerabilities.
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json > phase2_competitive.json
python -c "import json; d=json.load(open('phase2_competitive.json')); print('Differentiators:', d['differentiators']); print('Vulnerabilities:', d['vulnerabilities'])"
Output: Solution architecture, competitive positioning, technical differentiation strategy.
Validation checkpoint: Confirm at least one strong differentiator exists per customer priority before proceeding to Phase 3. If no differentiators found, escalate to Product Team (see Integration Points).
Objective: Deliver compelling technical demonstrations tailored to stakeholder priorities.
Checklist:
Templates: Use assets/demo_script_template.md for structured demo preparation.
Output: Customized demo, stakeholder-specific talking points, feedback capture.
Validation checkpoint: Demo script must cover every must-have requirement flagged in phase1_rfp_results.json before delivery. Cross-reference with:
python -c "import json; rfp=json.load(open('phase1_rfp_results.json')); [print('UNCOVERED:', r) for r in rfp['must_have_requirements'] if r['coverage']=='Gap']"
Objective: Execute a structured proof-of-concept that validates the solution.
Checklist:
Tools: Run poc_planner.py to generate the complete POC plan.
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json > phase4_poc_plan.json
python -c "import json; p=json.load(open('phase4_poc_plan.json')); print('Go/No-Go:', p['recommendation'])"
Templates: Use assets/poc_scorecard_template.md for evaluation tracking.
Output: POC plan, evaluation scorecard, go/no-go recommendation.
Validation checkpoint: POC conversion requires scorecard score >60% across all evaluation dimensions (functionality, performance, integration, usability, support). If score <60%, document gaps and loop back to Phase 2 for solution redesign.
Objective: Deliver a technical proposal that supports the commercial close.
Checklist:
Templates: Use assets/technical_proposal_template.md for the proposal document.
Output: Technical proposal, implementation timeline, risk mitigation plan.
Script: scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py
Purpose: Parse RFP/RFI requirements, score coverage, identify gaps, and generate bid/no-bid recommendations.
Coverage Categories: Full (100%), Partial (50%), Planned (25%), Gap (0%).
Priority Weighting: Must-Have 3×, Should-Have 2×, Nice-to-Have 1×.
Bid/No-Bid Logic:
Usage:
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json # human-readable
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json # JSON output
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py --help
Input Format: See assets/sample_rfp_data.json for the complete schema.
Script: scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py
Purpose: Generate feature comparison matrices, calculate competitive scores, identify differentiators and vulnerabilities.
Feature Scoring: Full (3), Partial (2), Limited (1), None (0).
Usage:
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json # human-readable
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json # JSON output
Output Includes: Feature comparison matrix, weighted competitive scores, differentiators, vulnerabilities, and win themes.
Script: scripts/poc_planner.py
Purpose: Generate structured POC plans with timeline, resource allocation, success criteria, and evaluation scorecards.
Default Phase Breakdown:
Usage:
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json # human-readable
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json # JSON output
Output Includes: Phased POC plan, resource allocation, success criteria, evaluation scorecard, risk register, and go/no-go recommendation framework.
| Reference | Description |
|---|---|
references/rfp-response-guide.md | RFP/RFI response best practices, compliance matrix, bid/no-bid framework |
references/competitive-positioning-framework.md | Competitive analysis methodology, battlecard creation, objection handling |
references/poc-best-practices.md | POC planning methodology, success criteria, evaluation frameworks |
| Template | Purpose |
|---|---|
assets/technical_proposal_template.md | Technical proposal with executive summary, solution architecture, implementation plan |
assets/demo_script_template.md | Demo script with agenda, talking points, objection handling |
assets/poc_scorecard_template.md | POC evaluation scorecard with weighted scoring |
assets/sample_rfp_data.json | Sample RFP data for testing the analyzer |
assets/expected_output.json | Expected output from rfp_response_analyzer.py |
../../marketing-skill/../../product-team/../../c-level-advisor/../customer-success-manager/Last Updated: February 2026 Status: Production-ready Tools: 3 Python automation scripts References: 3 knowledge base documents Templates: 5 asset files
Weekly Installs
107
Repository
GitHub Stars
6.9K
First Seen
Feb 6, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
claude-code88
gemini-cli87
codex85
opencode84
cursor80
github-copilot79
通过 LiteLLM 代理让 Claude Code 对接 GitHub Copilot 运行 | 高级变通方案指南
43,100 周安装