build-links by calm-north/seojuice-skills
npx skills add https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill build-links设计一个有针对性的外链获取活动,运用资产映射、潜在客户评分和推广序列设计。
收集以下背景信息(如未提供,请询问):
在选择策略之前,先诊断哪个权威维度最薄弱。这将决定外链建设工作在哪个方面能产生最大影响:
| 维度 | 衡量内容 | 薄弱迹象 |
|---|---|---|
| 引用 | 来自优质来源的入站引用 | 引用域名少,链接者权威度低,无编辑性链接 |
| 身份 | 品牌认知度和实体一致性 | 无品牌搜索量,无知识面板,名称/地址/电话信息不一致 |
| 信任 | 合法性和无操纵行为 | 外链档案垃圾信息多,无 HTTPS,内容单薄,收到手动操作惩罚 |
| 声望 |
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
| 可见度和行业地位 |
| 自然流量低,无搜索结果页面功能,无媒体报道 |
大多数网站有 1-2 个薄弱维度。诊断后再制定方案。
原创研究与数据
免费工具与计算器
综合指南(10 倍内容)
客座博客(高质量)
资源页面外链建设
[主题] + "资源",[主题] + "有用链接",[主题] + "工具"失效链接建设
记者查询平台(Connectively, Qwoted, Featured)
社区参与
数字公关
从 6 个因素对每个链接潜在目标(或现有外链)进行评分。每个因素评分为 1-5 分:
| 评分 | DR/DA 范围 | 示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | DR 70+ | 主要出版物,纽约时报,BBC |
| 4 | DR 50-69 | 行业出版物,成熟博客 |
| 3 | DR 30-49 | 中层博客,成长型公司 |
| 2 | DR 15-29 | 小型博客,新公司 |
| 1 | DR <15 | 新网站或内容单薄的网站 |
| 评分 | 相关性级别 |
|---|---|
| 5 | 完全匹配 — 相同利基市场,相同子主题 |
| 4 | 密切相关 — 相同行业,相邻主题 |
| 3 | 广泛相关 — 相同一般领域 |
| 2 | 略微相关 |
| 1 | 不相关 |
| 评分 | 月流量 |
|---|---|
| 5 | 10,000+ |
| 4 | 1,000-9,999 |
| 3 | 100-999 |
| 2 | 10-99 |
| 1 | <10 |
| 评分 | 位置 |
|---|---|
| 5 | 内容中,编辑性提及 |
| 4 | 内容中,上下文资源部分 |
| 3 | 作者简介或关于部分 |
| 2 | 侧边栏或专用链接部分 |
| 1 | 页脚、全站性或隐藏链接 |
| 评分 | 锚文本类型 |
|---|---|
| 5 | 描述性,自然语言 |
| 4 | 部分关键词匹配,自然 |
| 3 | 品牌名称 |
| 2 | 裸网址 |
| 1 | 通用型(“点击这里”、“阅读更多”) |
| 评分 | 状态 |
|---|---|
| 5 | Dofollow,编辑性 |
| 4 | Dofollow,非编辑性 |
| 3 | 赞助(rel="sponsored") |
| 2 | 用户生成内容(rel="ugc") |
| 1 | Nofollow |
LQS = (Authority x 0.25) + (Relevance x 0.25) + (Traffic x 0.15)
+ (Position x 0.15) + (Anchor x 0.10) + (Follow x 0.10)
| LQS 范围 | 评级 | 行动 |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0-5.0 | 优质链接 | 高优先级 — 积极争取 |
| 2.5-3.9 | 可接受链接 | 如果推广工作量低,值得争取 |
| 1.0-2.4 | 低质量链接 | 跳过 — 如果是现有外链,则审查风险 |
使用以下标准评估整体外链档案:
| 指标 | 健康 | 警告 | 危险 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dofollow 比例 | 60-80% | >90% | >95% |
| 精确匹配锚文本百分比 | <15% | 15-25% | >25% |
| 品牌锚文本百分比 | 25-45% | <15% | <5% |
| 有害链接百分比 | <5% | 5-10% | >10% |
| 平均链接域名评级 | 25+ | 15-25 | <15 |
切勿使用通用模板。 个性化每一封邮件。但可以参考以下结构:
在简单的表格中跟踪推广情况:
| 潜在目标 | URL | 评分 | 策略 | 状态 | 发送日期 | 回复 | 链接生效? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | 8/10 | 客座博客 | 已推介 | [日期] | 感兴趣 | 待定 |
| ... | ... | 7/10 | 失效链接 | 已发送 | [日期] | 无回复 | — |
基准:
当前概况评估
策略选择 基于可用资产和资源:
可链接资产
潜在目标列表
| 潜在目标 | 评分 | 策略 | 联系人 | 备注 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
推广计划
成功指标
专业提示: 使用免费的 域名权威度检查器 来评估你当前的权威度基线和潜在目标域名。SEOKuice MCP 用户可以运行
/seojuice:backlink-audit来查看哪些域名链接到你,识别值得恢复的丢失链接,并评估链接质量 —list_backlinks可以找到最近丢失的外链用于失效链接建设。
每周安装量
3.2K
代码库
GitHub 星标数
1
首次出现
11 天前
安全审计
安装于
claude-code364
codex363
antigravity343
cursor138
opencode122
github-copilot122
Design a targeted link acquisition campaign using asset mapping, prospect scoring, and outreach sequence design.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
Before choosing a strategy, diagnose which dimension of authority is weakest. This determines where link building effort will have the most impact:
| Dimension | What it measures | Signs of weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Citation | Inbound references from quality sources | Few referring domains, low-authority linkers, no editorial links |
| Identity | Brand recognition and entity coherence | No branded search volume, no knowledge panel, inconsistent NAP |
| Trust | Legitimacy and manipulation absence | Spammy backlink profile, no HTTPS, thin content, manual actions |
| Eminence | Visibility and industry standing | Low organic traffic, no SERP features, no media mentions |
Most sites have 1-2 weak dimensions. Diagnose before prescribing.
Original Research & Data
Free Tools & Calculators
Comprehensive Guides (10x Content)
Guest Posting (Quality)
Resource Page Link Building
[topic] + "resources", [topic] + "useful links", [topic] + "tools"Broken Link Building
Journalist Query Platforms (Connectively, Qwoted, Featured)
Community Participation
Digital PR
Score each link prospect (or existing backlink) across 6 factors. Rate each 1-5:
| Score | DR/DA Range | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | DR 70+ | Major publications, NYTimes, BBC |
| 4 | DR 50-69 | Industry publications, established blogs |
| 3 | DR 30-49 | Mid-tier blogs, growing companies |
| 2 | DR 15-29 | Small blogs, newer companies |
| 1 | DR <15 | New or thin sites |
| Score | Relevance Level |
|---|---|
| 5 | Exact match — same niche, same subtopic |
| 4 | Closely related — same industry, adjacent topic |
| 3 | Broadly related — same general field |
| 2 | Tangentially related |
| 1 | Unrelated |
| Score | Monthly Traffic |
|---|---|
| 5 | 10,000+ |
| 4 | 1,000-9,999 |
| 3 | 100-999 |
| 2 | 10-99 |
| 1 | <10 |
| Score | Position |
|---|---|
| 5 | In-content, editorial mention |
| 4 | In-content, contextual resources section |
| 3 | Author bio or about section |
| 2 | Sidebar or dedicated links section |
| 1 | Footer, sitewide, or hidden |
| Score | Anchor Type |
|---|---|
| 5 | Descriptive, natural language |
| 4 | Partial keyword match, natural |
| 3 | Brand name |
| 2 | Naked URL |
| 1 | Generic ("click here", "read more") |
| Score | Status |
|---|---|
| 5 | Dofollow, editorial |
| 4 | Dofollow, non-editorial |
| 3 | Sponsored (rel="sponsored") |
| 2 | UGC (rel="ugc") |
| 1 | Nofollow |
LQS = (Authority x 0.25) + (Relevance x 0.25) + (Traffic x 0.15)
+ (Position x 0.15) + (Anchor x 0.10) + (Follow x 0.10)
| LQS Range | Rating | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0-5.0 | Premium link | High priority — pursue aggressively |
| 2.5-3.9 | Acceptable link | Worth pursuing if outreach effort is low |
| 1.0-2.4 | Low quality | Skip — or review for risk if it's an existing backlink |
Use these to assess the overall backlink profile:
| Metric | Healthy | Warning | Critical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dofollow ratio | 60-80% | >90% | >95% |
| Exact match anchor % | <15% | 15-25% | >25% |
| Brand anchor % | 25-45% | <15% | <5% |
| Toxic link % | <5% | 5-10% | >10% |
| Average linking DR | 25+ | 15-25 | <15 |
Do NOT use generic templates. Personalize every email. But here's the structure:
Track outreach in a simple table:
| Prospect | URL | Score | Strategy | Status | Date Sent | Response | Link Live? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | 8/10 | Guest post | Pitched | [date] | Interested | Pending |
| ... | ... | 7/10 | Broken link | Sent | [date] | No reply | — |
Benchmarks:
Current Profile Assessment
Strategy Selection Based on available assets and resources:
Linkable Assets
Prospect List
| Prospect | Score | Strategy | Contact | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Outreach Plan
Success Metrics
Pro Tip: Use the free Domain Authority Checker to assess your current authority baseline and prospect domains. SEOJuice MCP users can run
/seojuice:backlink-auditto see which domains link to you, identify lost links worth recovering, and assess link quality —list_backlinksfinds recently lost backlinks for broken link building.
Weekly Installs
3.2K
Repository
GitHub Stars
1
First Seen
11 days ago
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykWarn
Installed on
claude-code364
codex363
antigravity343
cursor138
opencode122
github-copilot122
34,600 周安装