gtm-enterprise-onboarding by github/awesome-copilot
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill gtm-enterprise-onboarding从签约到价值实现的四阶段企业客户入职框架。目标不仅仅是上线——而是实现持续采用,避免在第12周出现断崖式下滑。
触发场景:
适用背景:
模式:
第1周:启动会议进展顺利。每个人都很兴奋。 第2-3周:技术发现、需求收集。仍然良好。 第4周:客户停止回应。会议被取消。"太忙了。"
发生了什么?
你在客户内部尚未达成一致之前就开始了客户入职流程。
谁在内部负责这个项目?
框架:内部负责人确认
在启动会议之前,回答:
客户方谁将:
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
如果你不能为每一项指定具体的人,你就没有项目负责人。你只是签了一份没人推动的合同。
如何修复:
在销售 → 客户成功交接期间(客户启动会议之前):
销售代表必须确定:
如果没有明确的负责人:
先不要开始入职流程。让销售介绍你认识经济决策者:
"在我们开始实施之前,我们希望确保您这边有合适的项目负责人。根据我们的经验,当有人负责每周推动项目时,实施才能成功。您团队中谁应该与我们合作?"
常见错误:
假设会有人负责。要明确询问。如果他们无法指定某人,这笔交易就有风险。
模式:
第6周上线。使用量激增。你们庆祝。
第8周:使用量趋于平稳。 第10周:使用量下降。 第12周:使用量比峰值下降50%。
原因:
你把上线当成了终点线。上线是起跑线。
推动持续采用的因素:
不是: 功能完整性、技术集成、培训课程
是: 持续的价值展示、用户成功案例、扩展用例
框架:上线后的采用阶段
第1-6周(实施): 使其正常运行
第6-12周(初步采用): 让人们开始使用
第12-26周(持续采用): 证明持续价值
第26周+(扩展): 在账户内增长
大多数团队错过的交接点:
第6周(上线)→ 第12周(持续采用)
大多数客户成功团队庆祝上线后就转向下一个客户。这正是流失种子被埋下的时候。
第6-12周该做什么:
第7周: 第一份价值报告 "这是您的团队在第一周取得的成果:[具体指标]。这是第12周的良好状态:[目标]。"
第9周: 用户成功案例 "[团队名称] 的 [用户姓名] 本周节省了 [X小时/减少了Y个错误]。这是他们的使用方式。"
第11周: 用例扩展对话 "您目前将我们用于 [主要用例]。像您这样的团队也将其用于 [相邻用例]。想探索一下吗?"
常见错误:
衡量"上线完成情况"而非"持续活跃使用情况"。上线不是成功。第26周保持采用率才是成功。
模式:
大多数入职失败可追溯到启动前的差距。
被忽视的事项:
销售未向客户成功团队充分介绍情况:
未确定内部项目负责人:
客户时间线不切实际:
框架:启动前检查清单
在安排启动会议之前,确认:
账户情报:
内部设置:
客户准备情况:
时间线验证:
决策标准:
只有当所有四个部分都得到验证后,才安排启动会议。如果存在差距,在与客户接洽前向销售或执行发起人提出。
常见错误:
在内部情况不明的情况下开始入职。这会造成混乱、错过截止日期,并削弱客户信心。
阶段1:启动(第1周)
目标: 就目标、时间线、成功指标达成一致
与会者: 执行发起人 + 项目负责人 + 技术负责人
议程:
交付成果: 24小时内发送启动会议纪要,包含成功指标、时间线、后续会议安排
阶段2:发现与规划(第2-3周)
目标: 了解技术环境、映射用例、规划推广
三个并行的工作流:
工作流1:技术发现
工作流2:成功规划
工作流3:技术设置
交付成果: 客户成功计划文档,包含用例、指标、时间线、里程碑
阶段3:实施(第4-6周)
目标: 部署到试点小组,验证用例,为更广泛推广做准备
三个并行轨道:
轨道1:管理与设置
轨道2:用户赋能
轨道3:试点与反馈
交付成果: 上线准备检查清单完成,试点小组已验证
阶段4:上线与持续成功(第6周+)
目标: 广泛推广,维持采用率,扩展用例
第6-8周(推广):
第8-12周(价值展示):
第12-26周(持续采用):
常见错误:
将上线视为完成。阶段4是决定留存成败的关键。
模式:
大多数入职团队按顺序运行工作流:
总时间:6周
更好的做法:并行轨道
同时运行技术设置、培训和试点:
总时间:3周
并行工作的原因:
如何执行:
为每个轨道分配明确的负责人:
每周跨轨道同步,以发现依赖关系和障碍。
常见错误:
等待"完美的技术设置"再开始试点。尽早让试点小组使用产品,即使设置还不完美。他们的反馈会使广泛推广效果更好。
Has sales identified a project owner by name?
├─ No → Get project owner identified before kickoff
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Is their timeline realistic given typical deployment?
├─ No → Reset expectations before kickoff
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Do you have internal capacity?
├─ No → Delay kickoff or get more resources
└─ Yes → Proceed to kickoff
Is customer responding to meeting invites?
├─ No → Week 4 ghosting, escalate to exec sponsor
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Are they completing their action items?
├─ No → No project owner, identify who drives this
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Is pilot group using the product?
├─ No → Pilot group wrong or product not solving pain
└─ Yes → On track
Are active users growing Week 6 → Week 12?
├─ Yes → Healthy adoption
└─ No → Continue...
│
Are active users declining?
├─ Yes → Adoption cliff, intervene immediately
└─ No (plateau) → At risk, start value demonstration
1. 在内部达成一致前开始客户入职
2. 未提前确定真正的项目负责人
3. 在未明确技术要求的情况下过度承诺时间线
4. 没有内部沟通中心
5. 将上线视为项目完成
6. 采用顺序轨道而非并行轨道
7. 上线后没有持续的指标跟踪
启动前验证:
启动会议议程(30-45分钟):
采用率跟踪(第6-26周):
四个阶段:
危险信号:
基于跨多个平台公司的企业入职经验——直接设计合作伙伴入职流程,并与客户成功团队在客户入职方面密切合作。不是理论——是多次目睹第4周客户失联后学到的教训,认识到上线 ≠ 成功,并理解了在第一年导致30%交易失败的采用率断崖。
每周安装量
152
仓库
GitHub 星标数
26.7K
首次出现
5 天前
安全审计
安装于
gemini-cli139
codex139
opencode139
cursor138
warp136
kimi-cli136
Four-phase framework for onboarding enterprise customers from contract to value realization. The goal isn't just go-live — it's sustained adoption that doesn't cliff at Week 12.
Triggers:
Context:
The Pattern:
Week 1: Kickoff call goes great. Everyone's excited. Week 2-3: Technical discovery, requirements gathering. Still good. Week 4: Customer stops responding. Meetings get cancelled. "Too busy."
What Happened?
You started customer onboarding before internal alignment on their side.
Who Owns This Project Internally?
The Framework: Internal Owner Validation
Before kickoff call, answer:
Who on customer side will:
If you can't name a specific person for each, you don't have a project owner. You have a signed contract with nobody driving it.
How to Fix It:
During sales → CS handoff (before customer kickoff):
Sales rep must identify:
If there's no clear owner:
Don't start onboarding yet. Have sales introduce you to economic buyer:
"Before we kick off implementation, we want to make sure we have the right project owner on your side. In our experience, implementations succeed when someone owns driving this forward week-to-week. Who on your team should we partner with?"
Common Mistake:
Assuming someone will own it. Ask explicitly. If they can't name someone, the deal is at risk.
The Pattern:
Go-live happens Week 6. Usage spikes. You celebrate.
Week 8: Usage plateaus. Week 10: Usage declining. Week 12: Usage down 50% from peak.
Why This Happens:
You treated go-live as the finish line. Go-live is the starting line.
What Drives Sustained Adoption:
Not: Feature completeness, technical integration, training sessions
Yes: Ongoing value demonstration, user success stories, expanding use cases
Framework: Adoption Stages Beyond Go-Live
Week 1-6 (Implementation): Get it working
Week 6-12 (Initial Adoption): Get people using it
Week 12-26 (Sustained Adoption): Prove ongoing value
Week 26+ (Expansion): Grow within account
The Handoff That Most Teams Miss:
Week 6 (go-live) → Week 12 (sustained adoption)
Most CS teams celebrate go-live and move to next customer. This is when churn seeds get planted.
What to Do Week 6-12:
Week 7: First value report "Here's what your team accomplished in the first week: [specific metric]. Here's what good looks like at Week 12: [target]."
Week 9: User success story "[User name] on [team name] saved [X hours/reduced Y errors] this week. Here's how they're using it."
Week 11: Use case expansion conversation "You're using us for [primary use case]. Teams like yours also use us for [adjacent use case]. Want to explore?"
Common Mistake:
Measuring "go-live completion" instead of "sustained active usage." Go-live is not success. Week 26 retained adoption is success.
The Pattern:
Most onboarding failures trace back to pre-kickoff gaps.
What Gets Missed:
Sales didn't brief CS properly:
No internal project owner identified:
Customer timeline unrealistic:
Framework: Pre-Kickoff Checklist
Before scheduling kickoff call, validate:
Account Intelligence:
Internal Setup:
Customer Readiness:
Timeline Validation:
Decision Criteria:
Only schedule kickoff when all four sections validated. If gaps exist, surface to sales or executive sponsor before engaging customer.
Common Mistake:
Starting onboarding without internal clarity. This creates confusion, missed deadlines, and erosion of customer confidence.
Phase 1: Kickoff (Week 1)
Goal: Align on objectives, timeline, success metrics
Attendees: Executive sponsors + project leads + technical leads
Agenda:
Deliverable: Kickoff recap sent within 24 hours with success metrics, timeline, next meetings
Phase 2: Discovery & Planning (Week 2-3)
Goal: Understand technical landscape, map use cases, plan rollout
Three parallel workstreams:
Workstream 1: Technical Discovery
Workstream 2: Success Planning
Workstream 3: Technical Setup
Deliverable: Customer Success Plan document with use cases, metrics, timeline, milestones
Phase 3: Implementation (Week 4-6)
Goal: Deploy to pilot group, validate use cases, prepare for broader rollout
Three parallel tracks:
Track 1: Administration & Setup
Track 2: User Enablement
Track 3: Pilot & Feedback
Deliverable: Go-live readiness checklist completed, pilot group validated
Phase 4: Go-Live & Ongoing Success (Week 6+)
Goal: Roll out broadly, sustain adoption, expand use cases
Week 6-8 (Rollout):
Week 8-12 (Value Demonstration):
Week 12-26 (Sustained Adoption):
Common Mistake:
Treating go-live as completion. Phase 4 is where retention is won or lost.
The Pattern:
Most onboarding teams run workstreams sequentially :
Total time: 6 weeks
What Works Better: Parallel Tracks
Run technical setup, training, and pilot simultaneously :
Total time: 3 weeks
Why Parallel Works:
How to Execute:
Assign clear owners to each track:
Weekly sync across tracks to surface dependencies and blockers.
Common Mistake:
Waiting for "perfect technical setup" before starting pilot. Get pilot group using it early, even if setup isn't perfect. Their feedback makes the broad rollout better.
Has sales identified a project owner by name?
├─ No → Get project owner identified before kickoff
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Is their timeline realistic given typical deployment?
├─ No → Reset expectations before kickoff
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Do you have internal capacity?
├─ No → Delay kickoff or get more resources
└─ Yes → Proceed to kickoff
Is customer responding to meeting invites?
├─ No → Week 4 ghosting, escalate to exec sponsor
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Are they completing their action items?
├─ No → No project owner, identify who drives this
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Is pilot group using the product?
├─ No → Pilot group wrong or product not solving pain
└─ Yes → On track
Are active users growing Week 6 → Week 12?
├─ Yes → Healthy adoption
└─ No → Continue...
│
Are active users declining?
├─ Yes → Adoption cliff, intervene immediately
└─ No (plateau) → At risk, start value demonstration
1. Starting customer onboarding before internal alignment
2. Not identifying real project owner upfront
3. Overcommitting on timeline without technical requirements
4. No internal communication hub
5. Treating go-live as project complete
6. Sequential tracks instead of parallel
7. No ongoing metrics post go-live
Pre-Kickoff Validation:
Kickoff Agenda (30-45 min):
Adoption Tracking (Week 6-26):
Four Phases:
Red Flags:
Based on enterprise onboarding across multiple platform companies — designing partner onboarding directly and collaborating closely with CS on customer onboarding. Not theory — lessons from seeing Week 4 ghosting happen repeatedly and learning that go-live ≠ success, and understanding the adoption cliff that kills 30% of deals in first year.
Weekly Installs
152
Repository
GitHub Stars
26.7K
First Seen
5 days ago
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
gemini-cli139
codex139
opencode139
cursor138
warp136
kimi-cli136
站立会议模板:敏捷开发每日站会指南与工具(含远程团队异步模板)
10,500 周安装
Clui CC - Claude代码桌面悬浮窗 | macOS本地AI编程助手 | 支持语音输入和多标签会话
520 周安装
ASO关键词研究指南:专业工具助你发现高价值应用商店关键词,提升下载量
529 周安装
Voicebox 开源语音合成与克隆工具:本地化 TTS 工作室,替代 ElevenLabs
529 周安装
Xcode Build Direct:使用原生 CLI 工具构建、测试与自动化 iOS/macOS 项目
150 周安装
Flask API开发指南:RESTful API、JWT认证、SQLAlchemy ORM与蓝图模块化设计
526 周安装
移动应用留存优化策略指南:提升第1日、第7日、第30日用户留存率
531 周安装