npx skills add https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings --skill 'Decision Helper'决策助手技能通过运用成熟的框架、心智模型和去偏见技术,引导您进行结构化的决策过程。该技能并非仅依赖直觉感受或陷入分析瘫痪,而是帮助您清晰思考那些重要的选择。
本技能应用决策科学、行为经济学和战略思维框架,帮助您系统评估选项、识别隐藏偏见、考虑长期后果,并做出让您充满信心的选择。它能识别不同类型的决策——可逆与不可逆、紧急与重要、个人与职业——并为每种类型提供合适的框架。
该工具不会替您做决定,而是澄清您的思路、揭示潜在假设,并确保您在选定路径前已充分考虑最关键的因素。
明确您实际要决定的内容:
扩展您的选择范围:
确定关键因素:
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
根据标准评估选项:
压力测试您的选择:
用于优先级和紧急性决策:
| 紧急 | 不紧急
---|---|---
重要 | 立即行动 | 安排计划
不重要 | 委派他人 | 消除
W 拓宽您的选项
R 现实检验您的假设
A 在决定前保持距离
P 为可能出错做好准备
设想自己到了 80 岁,然后问:
最佳适用:改变人生的决策、承担风险、职业选择
| 选项 | 标准 1(权重:5) | 标准 2(权重:3) | 标准 3(权重:2) | 总分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 选项 A | 4 × 5 = 20 | 3 × 3 = 9 | 5 × 2 = 10 | 39 |
| 选项 B | 5 × 5 = 25 | 2 × 3 = 6 | 3 × 2 = 6 | 37 |
最佳适用:涉及多重因素的复杂决策
双向门(可逆)
单向门(不可逆)
不要只问“接下来会发生什么?”,要问“然后呢?”
示例:
如果这个选项需要付出 10 倍的努力/成本,您还会选择它吗?
如果会 → 真正的优先事项 如果不会 → 可能没那么重要
| 操作 | 命令/触发词 |
|---|---|
| 启动决策过程 | "help me decide" 或 "making a decision" |
| 二元选择 | "should I [选项 A] or [选项 B]" |
| 生成选项 | "what are my options for [情境]" |
| 评估权衡 | "compare [选项 A] vs [选项 B]" |
| 压力测试 | "help me validate my decision" |
| 消除偏见 | "am I thinking clearly about [决策]" |
| 长远视角 | "future implications of [决策]" |
| 风险评估 | "what could go wrong with [决策]" |
框架:遗憾最小化 + 价值观一致性 问题:
框架:期望值 + 风险评估 问题:
框架:价值观一致性 + 长期影响 问题:
框架:艾森豪威尔矩阵 + 机会成本 问题:
框架:WRAP + 事前剖析 问题:
DECISION: [我要决定什么?]
TIMELINE: [我必须在何时决定?]
STAKES: [此事有多重要/可逆?]
OPTIONS:
A. [选项 1]
B. [选项 2]
C. [选项 3]
D. Do nothing / stay the course
WHAT MATTERS MOST (Criteria):
1. [标准 1] - 权重: [1-10]
2. [标准 2] - 权重: [1-10]
3. [标准 3] - 权重: [1-10]
EVALUATION:
| Criterion 1 | Criterion 2 | Criterion 3 | Total
Option A | | | |
Option B | | | |
Option C | | | |
ASSUMPTIONS I'M MAKING:
-
-
WHAT COULD GO WRONG:
Option A risks:
Option B risks:
10/10/10:
In 10 minutes, I'll feel...
In 10 months, I'll feel...
In 10 years, I'll feel...
DECISION: [选择]
WHY: [理由]
REVERSIBILITY: [ ] 可以撤销 [ ] 难以逆转 [ ] 不可逆转
REVIEW DATE: [何时重新评估此决定]
DECIDING: [问题]
OPTIONS:
A. [选项 A]
B. [选项 B]
PROS/CONS:
Option A:
✓ 优点
✓ 优点
✗ 缺点
✗ 缺点
Option B:
✓ 优点
✓ 优点
✗ 缺点
✗ 缺点
GUT FEELING: [直觉怎么说?]
LOGICAL CHOICE: [分析怎么说?]
IF THEY DISAGREE: [探索这种矛盾]
CHOICE: [决定]
DECISION: [我要决定什么]
MY CORE VALUES (in order):
1. [价值观 1]
2. [价值观 2]
3. [价值观 3]
OPTION A:
How it aligns with Value 1:
How it aligns with Value 2:
How it aligns with Value 3:
OPTION B:
How it aligns with Value 1:
How it aligns with Value 2:
How it aligns with Value 3:
WHICH OPTION BEST HONORS WHO I WANT TO BE?
DECISION: [选择]
是什么:倾向于让事物保持原状 应对方法:想象您是从零开始——您会选择当前状态吗?
是什么:因为已经投入而继续 应对方法:如果知道现在知道的情况,您今天还会开始这件事吗?
是什么:寻找支持您已有信念的证据 应对方法:主动寻找证伪证据
是什么:过度依赖第一条信息 应对方法:在听取他人意见前先自己生成选项
是什么:过度重视最近或生动的信息 应对方法:查看基准率和统计数据,而不仅仅是故事
是什么:高估成功的可能性 应对方法:进行事前剖析,考虑负面情景
是什么:过度思考以避免做出决定 应对方法:设定信息截止点,认识到收益递减
此技能可与以下技能良好配合:
用户:"help me decide"
技能响应:"我会帮助您清晰地思考这个问题。决策是一项技能,结构胜过一厢情愿。
首先告诉我:您要决定什么?
尽可能具体。例如:
您的决定是什么?"
用户:"我应该接受新的工作机会还是留在现在的公司?"
技能响应:"典型的职业十字路口。这是一个高利害关系、某种程度上可逆的决策(您可以再次换工作,但有成本)。
让我们适当地构建这个问题。我有一些澄清性问题:
背景问题:
时间线:您需要在何时决定?
驱动因素是什么?
工作机会:
工作中对您最重要的是什么?(前三项)
慢慢来——这里的清晰度决定了其他一切。"
用户:"需要在周五前决定。并非积极不满但感觉停滞不前。新工作加薪 20%,职位更高,但通勤时间更长。对我来说最重要的是:成长、工作与生活平衡、薪酬(按此顺序)"
技能响应:"明白了。成长是第一位的,平衡第二,金钱第三。新职位提供更多成长和金钱,但可能威胁平衡(通勤时间更长)。
让我们使用结构化框架:加权决策矩阵
以下是我们将根据您的标准为每个选项评分(1-10)的方法:
标准 1:成长/学习机会(权重:10 - 您的首要优先事项)
标准 2:工作与生活平衡(权重:8 - 第二优先事项)
标准 3:薪酬(权重:6 - 第三优先事项)
给我您对每个选项的诚实评分。然后我们将进行计算,并用其他框架进行验证。"
[继续评估、10/10/10 测试、遗憾最小化,并根据用户价值观给出最终建议]
每周安装次数
–
代码仓库
GitHub 星标数
2
首次出现时间
–
安全审计
The Decision Helper skill guides you through structured decision-making processes using proven frameworks, mental models, and de-biasing techniques. Rather than relying on gut feel alone or getting paralyzed by analysis, this skill helps you think clearly about choices that matter.
This skill applies decision science, behavioral economics, and strategic thinking frameworks to help you evaluate options systematically, identify hidden biases, consider long-term consequences, and make choices you'll be confident about. It recognizes different decision types—reversible vs. irreversible, urgent vs. important, personal vs. professional—and provides appropriate frameworks for each.
The tool doesn't make decisions for you—it clarifies your thinking, surfaces assumptions, and ensures you've considered what matters most before committing to a path.
Clarify what you're actually deciding:
Expand your choice set:
Identify what matters:
Assess options against criteria:
Pressure-test your choice:
For prioritization and urgency decisions:
| Urgent | Not Urgent
---|---|---
Important | DO NOW | SCHEDULE
Not Important | DELEGATE | ELIMINATE
W iden your options
R eality-test your assumptions
A ttain distance before deciding
P repare to be wrong
Project yourself to age 80 and ask:
Best for: Life-changing decisions, risk-taking, career choices
| Option | Criterion 1 (weight: 5) | Criterion 2 (weight: 3) | Criterion 3 (weight: 2) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Option A | 4 × 5 = 20 | 3 × 3 = 9 | 5 × 2 = 10 | 39 |
| Option B | 5 × 5 = 25 | 2 × 3 = 6 | 3 × 2 = 6 | 37 |
Best for: Complex decisions with multiple factors
Two-Way Doors (Reversible)
One-Way Doors (Irreversible)
Don't just ask "What happens next?" Ask "And then what?"
Example:
Would you take this option if it required 10x the effort/cost?
If yes → genuine priorities If no → probably not that important
| Action | Command/Trigger |
|---|---|
| Start decision process | "help me decide" or "making a decision" |
| Binary choice | "should I [option A] or [option B]" |
| Generate options | "what are my options for [situation]" |
| Evaluate trade-offs | "compare [option A] vs [option B]" |
| Pressure test | "help me validate my decision" |
| Remove bias | "am I thinking clearly about [decision]" |
| Long-term view | "future implications of [decision]" |
| Risk assessment | "what could go wrong with [decision]" |
Framework: Regret Minimization + Values Alignment Questions:
Framework: Expected Value + Risk Assessment Questions:
Framework: Values Alignment + Long-term Impact Questions:
Framework: Eisenhower Matrix + Opportunity Cost Questions:
Framework: WRAP + Pre-mortem Questions:
DECISION: [What am I deciding?]
TIMELINE: [When must I decide?]
STAKES: [How important/reversible is this?]
OPTIONS:
A. [Option 1]
B. [Option 2]
C. [Option 3]
D. Do nothing / stay the course
WHAT MATTERS MOST (Criteria):
1. [Criterion 1] - Weight: [1-10]
2. [Criterion 2] - Weight: [1-10]
3. [Criterion 3] - Weight: [1-10]
EVALUATION:
| Criterion 1 | Criterion 2 | Criterion 3 | Total
Option A | | | |
Option B | | | |
Option C | | | |
ASSUMPTIONS I'M MAKING:
-
-
WHAT COULD GO WRONG:
Option A risks:
Option B risks:
10/10/10:
In 10 minutes, I'll feel...
In 10 months, I'll feel...
In 10 years, I'll feel...
DECISION: [Choice]
WHY: [Rationale]
REVERSIBILITY: [ ] Can undo [ ] Hard to reverse [ ] Irreversible
REVIEW DATE: [When to reassess this decision]
DECIDING: [Question]
OPTIONS:
A. [Option A]
B. [Option B]
PROS/CONS:
Option A:
✓ Pro
✓ Pro
✗ Con
✗ Con
Option B:
✓ Pro
✓ Pro
✗ Con
✗ Con
GUT FEELING: [What does intuition say?]
LOGICAL CHOICE: [What does analysis say?]
IF THEY DISAGREE: [Explore the tension]
CHOICE: [Decision]
DECISION: [What I'm deciding]
MY CORE VALUES (in order):
1. [Value 1]
2. [Value 2]
3. [Value 3]
OPTION A:
How it aligns with Value 1:
How it aligns with Value 2:
How it aligns with Value 3:
OPTION B:
How it aligns with Value 1:
How it aligns with Value 2:
How it aligns with Value 3:
WHICH OPTION BEST HONORS WHO I WANT TO BE?
DECISION: [Choice]
What it is : Preferring things to stay the same Counter : Imagine you're starting fresh—would you choose current state?
What it is : Continuing because you've already invested Counter : Would you start this today knowing what you know?
What it is : Seeking evidence that supports what you already believe Counter : Actively seek disconfirming evidence
What it is : Over-relying on first piece of information Counter : Generate options before hearing others' opinions
What it is : Overweighting recent or vivid information Counter : Look at base rates and statistics, not just stories
What it is : Overestimating chances of success Counter : Run a pre-mortem, consider downside scenarios
What it is : Overthinking to avoid deciding Counter : Set information cutoff, recognize diminishing returns
This skill works well with:
User : "help me decide"
Skill Response : "I'll help you think through this clearly. Decision-making is a skill, and structure beats wishful thinking.
First, tell me: What are you deciding?
Be as specific as you can. For example:
What's your decision?"
User : "Should I take the new job offer or stay at my current company?"
Skill Response : "Classic career crossroads. This is a high-stakes, somewhat reversible decision (you could change jobs again, but there are costs).
Let's structure this properly. I have some clarifying questions:
Context Questions:
Timeline : When do you need to decide?
What's driving this?
The offers :
What matters most to you in a job? (Top 3)
Take your time—clarity here shapes everything else."
User : "Need to decide by Friday. Not actively unhappy but feeling stagnant. New job is 20% raise, more senior role, but longer commute. Most important to me: growth, work-life balance, compensation (in that order)"
Skill Response : "Got it. Growth is #1, balance #2, money #3. The new role offers more growth and money but potentially threatens balance (longer commute).
Let's use a structured framework: Weighted Decision Matrix
Here's how we'll score each option (1-10) on your criteria:
CRITERION 1: Growth/Learning Opportunity (Weight: 10 - your top priority)
CRITERION 2: Work-Life Balance (Weight: 8 - second priority)
CRITERION 3: Compensation (Weight: 6 - third priority)
Give me your honest ratings for each. Then we'll run the math and validate with other frameworks."
[Continues with evaluation, 10/10/10 test, regret minimization, and final recommendation based on user's values]
Weekly Installs
–
Repository
GitHub Stars
2
First Seen
–
Security Audits
Python PDF处理教程:合并拆分、提取文本表格、创建PDF文件
58,600 周安装