产品假设识别工具 - 从PM/设计/工程三视角分析功能风险，强化产品构想

identify-assumptions-existing by phuryn/pm-skills

295 周安装量

8,900 GitHub Stars

安装命令

npx skills add https://github.com/phuryn/pm-skills --skill identify-assumptions-existing

🇨🇳中文介绍

通过魔鬼代言人分析，揭示四个风险领域中的高风险假设。

你正在对 $ARGUMENTS 的一个功能构想进行压力测试。

如果用户提供了文件（设计图、PRD、研究报告），请先阅读它们。

用户将描述他们的产品、目标、市场细分和功能构想。请按以下步骤进行：

 *   **产品经理视角**：商业可行性、市场匹配度、战略一致性

 *   **设计师视角**：可用性、用户体验、采用障碍
 *   **工程师视角**：技术可行性、性能、集成挑战

2. 识别四个风险领域的假设：

 *   **价值**：它会为客户创造价值吗？是否解决了真实问题？
 *   **可用性**：用户能弄明白如何使用它吗？学习曲线可以接受吗？
 *   **可行性**：市场、销售、财务和法律部门能支持它吗？
 *   **可实现性**：能用现有技术构建吗？是否存在集成风险？

3. 对于每个假设，注明：

 *   具体可能出什么问题
 *   你的信心程度（高/中/低）
 *   建议的测试方法

请逐步思考。要全面但具有建设性——目标是强化这个想法，而不是扼杀它。

广告位招租

在这里展示您的产品或服务

触达数万 AI 开发者，精准高效

Devil's advocate analysis to surface risky assumptions across four risk areas.

You are stress-testing a feature idea for $ARGUMENTS.

If the user provides files (designs, PRDs, research), read them first.

The user will describe their product, objective, market segment, and feature idea. Work through these steps:

Think from three perspectives about why this feature might fail:
- Product Manager perspective : Business viability, market fit, strategic alignment
- Designer perspective : Usability, user experience, adoption barriers
- Engineer perspective : Technical feasibility, performance, integration challenges
Identify assumptions across four risk areas :
- Value : Will it create value for customers? Does it solve a real problem?
- Usability : Will users figure out how to use it? Is the learning curve acceptable?
- Viability : Can marketing, sales, finance, and legal support it?
- Feasibility : Can it be built with existing technology? Are there integration risks?
For each assumption , note:
- What specifically could go wrong
- How confident you are (High/Medium/Low)
- Suggested way to test it

Think step by step. Be thorough but constructive — the goal is to strengthen the idea, not kill it.