npx skills add https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill brief制作一份完整、可供编辑的内容简报,涵盖意图分析、竞争性搜索结果页面审查、内容大纲、E-E-A-T 要求以及 SEO 目标。
收集以下背景信息(如果未提供,请询问):
分析当前针对目标关键词排名靠前的内容:
记录:
| 排名 | 标题 | URL | 格式 | 大约长度 | 独特角度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ... | ... | guide / listicle / tutorial |
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
| ... |
| ... |
确定确切的用户意图并将其映射到内容结构:
内容结构必须符合搜索者期望找到的内容。
构建详细大纲,包含:
选择符合内容类型的公式:
| 内容类型 | 公式 | 示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 操作指南 / 教程 | "如何在 [时间段] 内 [达成目标]" | "如何在 30 分钟内修复抓取错误" |
| 操作指南(反驳) | "如何在不 [反对点] 的情况下 [达成目标]" | "如何在不进行冷外联的情况下建立链接" |
| 列表文章 | "[数量] 个 [形容词] [主题] [限定词]" | "适用于 SaaS 的 9 个经过验证的链接建设策略" |
| 对比 | "[A] vs [B]:哪个更适合 [目标]?" | "Ahrefs vs SEMrush:哪个更适合关键词研究?" |
| 定义 | "什么是 [主题]?[简短说明]" | "什么是主题权威?它如何影响排名" |
| 终极指南 | "[完整/权威] [主题] 指南" | "技术性 SEO 完整指南" |
| 常见错误 | "[数量] 个 [主题] 错误 [后果]" | "7 个扼杀排名的内部链接错误" |
点击率提升元素 — 测试添加以下元素:
| 元素 | 预期点击率影响 |
|---|---|
| 添加数字 | +15-25% |
| 添加当前年份 | +10-15% |
| 添加方括号或圆括号 | +10-38% |
| 添加强力词(已验证、必备、终极) | +5-12% |
规则:
选择一个模板并进行调整:
| 内容类型 | 模板 |
|---|---|
| 博客 / 指南 | "通过我们的 [限定词] 指南学习 [主题]。涵盖 [要点 1]、[要点 2] 和 [要点 3]。[行动号召]" |
| 问答 | "[问题]?这份 [年份] 指南解释了 [是什么]、[为什么] 和 [如何做]。立即获取可操作的建议。" |
| 列表文章 | "发现 [数量] 个 [形容词] [主题] 策略,以实现 [结果]。基于 [证明元素]。阅读指南。" |
| 对比 | "[A] vs [B]:哪个更适合 [使用场景]?我们比较了 [标准]。查看获胜者 + 详细分析。" |
| 产品/服务 | "[产品] 帮助您 [获益]。[功能 1]、[功能 2]、[功能 3]。[价格/优惠]。[行动号召]" |
规则:
规划每个 H2 和 H3,并为每个部分提供简要指导:
H1: [标题]
H2: [第 1 部分] — 涵盖内容,目标长度
H3: [子部分] — 具体要点
H2: [第 2 部分] — 涵盖内容
...
H2: 常见问题解答 — 来自"用户还问了以下问题"的 3-5 个问题
为每个 H2 部分指定:
首先,确定关键词是否属于"您的金钱或您的生活"领域(健康、金融、法律、安全)。YMYL 主题会触发谷歌更高的 E-E-A-T 要求:
指定作者针对此主题所需的资质:
| 主题类型 | 作者要求 |
|---|---|
| YMYL(健康、金融、法律) | 持牌专业人士或具有公开资质的可验证专家 |
| 技术(代码、工程) | 经过验证的从业经验(作品集、GitHub、出版物) |
| 商业/营销 | 行业经验或署名的案例研究 |
| 一般信息性 | 带有简介的署名即可 |
为此文章设定最低证据标准:
| 内容类型 | 最低引用数 | 来源层级要求 |
|---|---|---|
| 研究/数据驱动 | 5+ 次引用 | 至少 2 个主要来源(官方文档、研究、.gov/.edu) |
| 操作指南 / 教程 | 2-3 次引用 | 所引用工具/方法的官方文档 |
| 观点 / 思想领导力 | 3+ 次引用 | 支持每个主要主张的数据 |
| 对比 / "最佳 X" | 每个被评测项目 1 个 | 每个项目的第一手测试证据 |
指定内容需要什么:
不同的内容类型对 E-E-A-T 信号的重视程度不同。将精力集中在最重要的地方:
| 内容类型 | 经验 | 专业知识 | 权威性 | 可信度 | 最高优先级 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产品评测 | 关键 | 高 | 中 | 高 | 经验 — 实际测试证据 |
| 操作指南 | 高 | 关键 | 中 | 高 | 专业知识 — 展示深厚知识 |
| 研究/数据 | 中 | 关键 | 关键 | 关键 | 权威性 + 可信度 — 有来源的数据、方法论 |
| 观点文章 | 关键 | 高 | 高 | 中 | 经验 — 个人资质和观点 |
| 对比 | 高 | 高 | 中 | 关键 | 可信度 — 无偏见的评判标准、透明的方法论 |
| 新闻/报道 | 中 | 中 | 关键 | 关键 | 权威性 — 公认的来源、编辑标准 |
对于每篇文章,至少验证以下内容:
| 元素 | 目标 |
|---|---|
| 主要关键词 | [关键词] |
| 次要关键词 | [2-3 个相关术语] |
| 字数范围 | [基于搜索结果页面分析的最小-最大值] |
| 需包含的内部链接 | [列出要链接到的具体页面] |
| 需包含的外部链接 | [要引用的来源类型] |
| 图片/媒体 | [数量和类型:截图、图表、表格] |
| 精选摘要目标 | [是/否 — 如果是,哪种格式:段落、列表、表格] |
简报必须明确指出是什么让这篇文章优于当前排名靠前的内容:
选择 1-2 个角度。试图在所有维度上都胜出会产生泛泛的内容。
概述
搜索结果页面竞争格局 [来自步骤 1 的表格]
标题选项
元描述 [150-160 字符的描述]
内容大纲 [完整的标题结构及各部分指导]
SEO 目标 [来自步骤 5 的表格]
E-E-A-T 检查清单
差异化 [是什么让这篇文章优于当前靠前的结果]
专业提示: 使用免费的 关键词密度分析器 和 TF-IDF 工具 来对标竞争对手针对您目标关键词的内容深度。SEOKJuice MCP 用户可以运行
/seojuice:keyword-analysis来获取搜索量和难度,并运行/seojuice:content-strategy来检查该主题是否适合现有集群或填补内容空白。
每周安装量
3.9K
代码仓库
GitHub Stars
3
首次出现
2026年2月27日
安全审计
安装于
codex455
claude-code432
antigravity423
github-copilot176
opencode166
cursor163
Produce a complete, editor-ready content brief covering intent analysis, competitive SERP review, content outline, E-E-A-T requirements, and SEO targets.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
Analyze what currently ranks for the target keyword:
Record:
| Rank | Title | URL | Format | Approx. Length | Unique Angle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ... | ... | guide / listicle / tutorial | ... | ... |
Determine the exact user intent and map it to content structure:
The content structure must match what the searcher expects to find.
Build a detailed outline with:
Select the formula that matches the content type:
| Content Type | Formula | Example |
|---|---|---|
| How-to / Tutorial | "How to [Goal] in [Timeframe]" | "How to Fix Crawl Errors in 30 Minutes" |
| How-to (objection) | "How to [Goal] Without [Objection]" | "How to Build Links Without Cold Outreach" |
| Listicle | "[N] [Adjective] [Topic] [Qualifier]" | "9 Proven Link Building Strategies for SaaS" |
| Comparison | "[A] vs [B]: Which Is Better for [Goal]?" | "Ahrefs vs SEMrush: Which Is Better for Keyword Research?" |
| Definition | "What Is [Topic]? [Short Clarifier]" | "What Is Topical Authority? How It Affects Rankings" |
| Ultimate guide | "The [Complete/Definitive] Guide to [Topic]" | "The Complete Guide to Technical SEO" |
| Mistakes | "[N] [Topic] Mistakes [Consequence]" | "7 Internal Linking Mistakes That Kill Rankings" |
CTR boosters — test adding these elements:
| Element | Expected CTR Impact |
|---|---|
| Add a number | +15-25% |
| Add current year | +10-15% |
| Add brackets or parentheses | +10-38% |
| Add a power word (Proven, Essential, Ultimate) | +5-12% |
Rules:
Select a template and adapt:
| Content Type | Template |
|---|---|
| Blog / Guide | "Learn [topic] with our [qualifier] guide. Covers [point 1], [point 2], and [point 3]. [CTA]." |
| Question-answer | "[Question]? This [year] guide explains [what], [why], and [how]. Get actionable tips now." |
| Listicle | "Discover [N] [adjective] [topic] strategies that [result]. Backed by [proof element]. Read the guide." |
| Comparison | "[A] vs [B]: which is better for [use case]? We compared [criteria]. See the winner + detailed breakdown." |
| Product/Service | "[Product] helps you [benefit]. [Feature 1], [Feature 2], [Feature 3]. [Price/offer]. [CTA]." |
Rules:
Map out every H2 and H3 with brief guidance for each section:
H1: [Title]
H2: [Section 1] — what to cover, target length
H3: [Subsection] — specific points
H2: [Section 2] — what to cover
...
H2: FAQ — 3-5 questions from People Also Ask
For each H2 section, specify:
First, determine if the keyword falls into "Your Money or Your Life" territory (health, finance, legal, safety). YMYL topics trigger elevated E-E-A-T requirements from Google:
Specify what credentials the author needs for this topic:
| Topic Type | Author Requirement |
|---|---|
| YMYL (health, finance, legal) | Licensed professional or verifiable expert with public credentials |
| Technical (code, engineering) | Demonstrated practitioner experience (portfolio, GitHub, publications) |
| Business/marketing | Industry experience or named case studies |
| General informational | Byline with bio is sufficient |
Set the minimum evidence bar for this piece:
| Content Type | Minimum Sources | Source Tier Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Research/data-driven | 5+ citations | At least 2 primary sources (official docs, studies, .gov/.edu) |
| How-to / tutorial | 2-3 citations | Official documentation for tools/methods referenced |
| Opinion / thought leadership | 3+ citations | Data to support each major claim |
| Comparison / "best X" | 1 per item reviewed | First-hand testing evidence for each |
Specify what the content needs:
Different content types weight E-E-A-T signals differently. Focus effort where it matters most:
| Content Type | Experience | Expertise | Authority | Trust | Top Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product review | Critical | High | Medium | High | Experience — hands-on testing evidence |
| How-to guide | High | Critical | Medium | High | Expertise — demonstrate deep knowledge |
| Research/data | Medium | Critical | Critical | Critical | Authority + Trust — sourced data, methodology |
| Opinion piece | Critical | High | High | Medium | Experience — personal credentials and POV |
| Comparison | High |
For every piece, verify at minimum:
| Element | Target |
|---|---|
| Primary keyword | [keyword] |
| Secondary keywords | [2-3 related terms] |
| Word count range | [min-max based on SERP analysis] |
| Internal links to include | [list specific pages to link to] |
| External links to include | [types of sources to cite] |
| Images/media | [count and types: screenshots, diagrams, tables] |
| Featured snippet target | [yes/no — if yes, which format: paragraph, list, table] |
The brief must specify what makes this piece better than what already ranks:
Pick 1-2 angles. Trying to win on all dimensions produces generic content.
Overview
SERP Competitive Landscape [Table from Step 1]
Title Options
Meta Description [150-160 char description]
Content Outline [Full heading structure with guidance per section]
SEO Targets [Table from Step 5]
E-E-A-T Checklist
Differentiation [What makes this piece better than current top results]
Pro Tip: Use the free Keyword Density Analyzer and TF-IDF Tool to benchmark competitor content depth for your target keyword. SEOJuice MCP users can run
/seojuice:keyword-analysisfor search volume and difficulty, and/seojuice:content-strategyto check if the topic fits an existing cluster or fills a content gap.
Weekly Installs
3.9K
Repository
GitHub Stars
3
First Seen
Feb 27, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykWarn
Installed on
codex455
claude-code432
antigravity423
github-copilot176
opencode166
cursor163
专业SEO审计工具:全面网站诊断、技术SEO优化与页面分析指南
56,300 周安装
| High |
| Medium |
| Critical |
| Trust — unbiased criteria, transparent methodology |
| News/reporting | Medium | Medium | Critical | Critical | Authority — recognized source, editorial standards |