ln-210-epic-coordinator by levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-210-epic-coordinatorPaths: File paths (
shared/,references/,../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. Ifshared/is missing, fetch files via WebFetch fromhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.
通用的 Epic 管理协调器,通过范围分解处理创建和重新规划。
协调从范围分解创建 Epic(CREATE 模式)和重新规划 Epic(REPLAN 模式),生成 3-7 个 Linear 项目,并提供批量预览、从文档/HTML 自动提取信息以及“分解优先”模式。
此技能应在以下情况使用:
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
输出: 3-7 个 Linear 项目(逻辑领域/模块)
关键原则: 始终先分析范围并构建理想的 Epic 计划,然后再检查现有 Epic 以确定模式:
原理: 确保基于当前范围需求进行一致的 Epic 分解,不受现有 Epic 结构(可能已过时或非最优)的影响。
必读: 加载 shared/references/numbering_conventions.md 以了解 Epic 0 规则、何时使用它以及 Linear 编号规范。
| 输入 | 必需 | 来源 | 描述 |
|---|---|---|---|
scopeDoc | 是 | 参数、项目文档、用户 | 用于 Epic 分解的范围文档 |
解析: Epic 解析链(已适配:范围文档发现)。后备方案: 如果未找到范围文档 → 询问用户问题:“应将什么分解为 Epic?”
必读: 加载 shared/references/tools_config_guide.md、shared/references/storage_mode_detection.md、shared/references/input_resolution_pattern.md
提取:task_provider = 任务管理 → 提供商
目标: 在 Epic 分解之前收集所有必要的上下文。
步骤 0:解析 scopeDoc(根据 input_resolution_pattern.md,已适配用于范围):
docs/project/requirements.md → 用作范围来源docs/requirements.md → 用作范围来源步骤 1:加载配置
从 docs/tasks/kanban_board.md 自动发现团队 ID 和下一个 Epic 编号:
必读: 加载 CLAUDE.md — 章节“配置自动发现”和“Linear 集成”。
步骤 2:项目研究
目标: 在研究项目文档和前端代码以了解上下文,然后再询问用户问题。
流程:
文档扫描:
Glob 查找:docs/requirements.md、docs/architecture.md、docs/tech_stack.mdRead 加载找到的文档前端代码扫描(如适用):
Glob 查找:**/*.html、src/**/*.html、public/**/*.html、templates/**/*.htmlRead 加载 HTML 文件<nav>、<a href> 链接揭示功能区域<h1>、<title> 标签揭示功能名称HTML 提取示例:
<nav>
<a href="/products">Products</a>
<a href="/cart">Shopping Cart</a>
<a href="/checkout">Checkout</a>
</nav>
<!-- 揭示领域:产品目录、购物车、支付 -->
3. 从文档 + HTML 中提取关键信息:
* **业务目标:** 项目试图实现什么?(来自 requirements.md)
* **用户角色:** 谁将使用该系统?(来自 requirements.md)
* **主要功能领域:** 主要模块/区域是什么?(来自 requirements.md、architecture.md、HTML 导航)
* **技术栈:** 提到了哪些技术?(来自 tech_stack.md、architecture.md、HTML meta/script 标签)
* **基础设施需求:** 是否提及日志记录、监控、部署、CI/CD、安全、性能优化?
4. 合并发现结果:
* 合并来自文档 + HTML 的领域(去重、整合相似的)
* 示例:“用户认证”(来自文档)+ “登录”(来自 HTML)→ “用户管理”
后备方案: 如果文档和 HTML 都缺失 → 跳转到阶段 2,将询问用户基本问题
步骤 3:基础设施 Epic 决策
目标: 确定是否应提议基础设施 Epic(Epic 0)。
基础设施 Epic 的条件:
✅ 提议基础设施 Epic(Epic 0) 如果满足以下任一条件:
docs/infrastructure.md,kanban_board.md 的 Epic 故事计数器中无标题为“基础设施”的 Epic)❌ 不提议 如果:
docs/infrastructure.md)决策: 存储是/否决策以供阶段 2 使用
阶段 1 的输出:
目标: 识别逻辑领域并内联构建 Epic 结构。
流程:
步骤 1:自动识别领域
使用阶段 1 步骤 2 的研究上下文:
后备方案: 如果无文档/HTML → 询问用户基本问题(范围、目标、功能区域)
步骤 2:构建 Epic 列表(内联)
如果需要基础设施(来自阶段 1 步骤 3):
numbering_conventions.md §Epic 0 内容模板否则:
步骤 3:确定 Epic 数量
步骤 4:显示提议的 Epic 结构(用户控制点 1)
显示已识别的 Epic 及其在计划内的索引:
📋 提议的 Epic 结构:
Epic 0:基础设施与运维
Epic 1:用户管理
Epic 2:产品目录
Epic 3:购物车
Epic 4:支付处理
Epic 5:订单管理
总计:6 个 Epic
输入 "confirm" 继续,或修改列表
步骤 5:用户确认
输出: 批准的 Epic 列表(Epic 0-N 或 Epic 1-N)准备进入下一阶段
上下文: 在创建 Epic 之前进行结构化质量检查,确保范围清晰,防止在用户故事分解期间返工。
对于每个提议的 Epic,验证 5 个标准:
---|---|---|---
1 | 范围清晰度 | 清晰的内部/外部边界 | 模糊或与其他 Epic 重叠
2 | 成功标准 | 可衡量("<200ms"、">98%") | 模糊("快速"、"可靠")
3 | 风险记录 | 已识别依赖项/阻碍 | 风险部分为空或通用
4 | 平衡性 | 各 Epic 范围大小相似(±30%) | 一个 Epic 占 80% 的工作量
5 | 独立性 | 无循环 Epic 依赖 | Epic 相互阻碍
质量分数 = 通过标准的数量(0-5)
目标: 确定 CREATE 与 REPLAN 模式。
查询 kanban_board.md 和任务提供商以获取现有 Epic:
list_projects(team=teamId) 进行交叉检查 否则: Glob("docs/tasks/epics/*/epic.md") 列出基于文件的 Epic决策点:
触发条件: 阶段 3 确定数量 = 0(CREATE 模式)
目标: 在批量预览之前准备所有 Epic 文档。
步骤 1:为所有领域自动提取信息
对于每个领域(来自阶段 2),从项目文档中提取 5 个关键问题的答案:
Q1:业务目标 - 为什么此 Epic/领域重要
Q2:范围内的关键功能 - 3-5 个能力要点
Q3:范围外 - 防止范围蔓延
Q4:成功标准 - 可衡量的结果
Q5:已知风险(可选) - 阻碍、依赖项
如果提取不完整:
步骤 2:生成所有 Epic 文档
对于每个领域,使用 epic_template_universal.md 生成完整的 Epic 文档:
Epic 索引:
Linear 标题(将在阶段 5a 中创建):
部分: 目标、范围(内/外)、成功标准、依赖项、风险与缓解措施、架构影响、阶段
使用步骤 1 中提取的信息 填充所有部分
输出: 所有 Epic 文档准备就绪(Epic 0-N),在计划内建立索引
触发条件: 阶段 4 完成准备
目标: 显示预览,获取确认,在 Linear 中创建所有 Epic。
步骤 1:显示批量预览(用户控制点 2)
显示所有生成的 Epic 及其在计划内的索引:
📋 Epic 批量预览(将创建 6 个 Epic)
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
Epic 0:基础设施与运维
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
目标:建立基础架构、部署流水线和运维能力,以支持所有业务 Epic
范围内:
- 日志记录和错误处理框架
- 监控和告警系统
- CI/CD 流水线(GitHub Actions)
- 安全基线(密钥管理、加密)
- 性能优化(缓存、速率限制)
范围外:
- 应用特定的业务逻辑
- 面向用户的功能
- 领域特定的集成
成功标准:
- 所有部署通过 CI/CD 自动化(<10 分钟部署时间)
- 系统可用性 ≥99.9%
- API 响应时间 <200ms(p95)
- 通过安全审计
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
Epic 1:用户管理
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
目标:使用户能够安全地注册、认证和管理其账户
范围内:
- 带邮箱验证的用户注册
- 使用 JWT 认证的登录/登出
- 密码重置流程
- 个人资料管理
范围外:
- 社交登录(OAuth)- 计划用于 Epic 5
- 多因素认证 - 未来版本
- 用户角色和权限 - 属于 Epic 3 的一部分
成功标准:
- 用户注册 <2 秒
- 登录成功率 >98%
- 密码重置完成率 >90%
[... 所有其他 Epic ...]
───────────────────────────────────────────────
总计:6 个 Epic(Epic 0:基础设施,Epic 1-5:业务领域)
输入 "confirm" 在 Linear 中创建所有 Epic
步骤 2:用户确认
| 条件 | 操作 |
|---|---|
| 用户确认(输入 "confirm" 或批准) | 停止 — 继续创建 |
| 用户反馈循环 >= 3 | 停止 — 询问:“3 次修订循环。使用当前版本继续,还是放弃?” |
| 经过 2 次返工尝试后 Epic 质量门控分数 < 3/5 | 停止 — 升级:“无法达到质量阈值。请审查范围。” |
步骤 3:创建所有 Epic
对于每个 Epic(按顺序以确保编号一致性):
获取下一个 Epic 编号:
创建 Epic(取决于提供商):
如果 task_provider == "linear":
* `save_project({name: "Epic {N}: {Title}", description: epic_markdown, team: teamId, state: "planned"})`
* 收集返回的 URL
否则(文件模式):
* `mkdir -p docs/tasks/epics/epic-{N}-{slug}/stories/`
* `Write("docs/tasks/epics/epic-{N}-{slug}/epic.md")` 包含 Epic markdown + 文件头(`**状态:** 待办事项`、`**创建时间:** {日期}`)
3. 更新 kanban_board.md:
* 在 Linear 配置表中将下一个 Epic 编号增加 1
* 向 Epic 故事计数器添加新行:`Epic {N} | - | US001 | - | EPN_01`
* 添加到“Epic 概览” → 活跃:`- [Epic {N}: 标题](链接) - 待办事项`
4. 收集 URL(Linear 模式)或文件路径(文件模式)
步骤 4:显示摘要
✅ 为计划创建了 6 个 Epic
已创建的 Epic:
- Epic 11:基础设施与运维(Epic 0 索引)[链接]
- Epic 12:用户管理(Epic 1 索引)[链接]
- Epic 13:产品目录(Epic 2 索引)[链接]
- Epic 14:购物车(Epic 3 索引)[链接]
- Epic 15:支付处理(Epic 4 索引)[链接]
- Epic 16:订单管理(Epic 5 索引)[链接]
下一个 Epic 编号更新为:17
后续步骤:
1. 使用 ln-220-story-coordinator 为每个 Epic 创建用户故事(运行 6 次)
2. 或使用 ln-200-scope-decomposer 自动创建 Epic + 用户故事
输出: 创建的 Epic URL + 摘要
TodoWrite 格式: 添加阶段 1-5a 的待办事项 + 每个 Epic 一个待办事项 + kanban 更新。标记为进行中/已完成。
触发条件: 阶段 3 确定数量 ≥ 1(REPLAN 模式)
完整工作流程: 必读: 加载 references/replan_workflow.md 以获取完整的 REPLAN 流程。
摘要:
docs/tasks/epics/*/epic.md)约束: 绝不自动更新/归档有“进行中”用户故事的 Epic。绝不删除(使用归档)。始终需要确认。
在完成工作之前,验证所有检查点:
✅ 发现完成(阶段 1):
✅ 范围分析完成(阶段 2):
✅ 已检查现有 Epic(阶段 3):
✅ Epic 准备完成(阶段 4 - 仅 CREATE):
✅ Epic 创建完成(阶段 5a - 仅 CREATE):
✅ Epic 重新规划完成(阶段 5b - 仅 REPLAN):
references/replan_workflow.md 以获取完整检查清单输出: Linear 项目 URL 列表(Epic {N}: {标题})+ 下一个 Epic 编号值
请求: “为电子商务平台创建 epic”
流程: 阶段 1(发现 Team ID=Product,Next=11,扫描文档+HTML)→ 阶段 2(识别 6 个领域:基础设施、用户、产品、购物车、支付、订单)→ 阶段 3(数量=0 → CREATE)→ 阶段 4(自动提取 Q1-Q5,生成文档)→ 阶段 5a(预览、确认、在 Linear 中创建:Epic 11-16)
结果: 创建了 6 个 Epic(Epic 0-5 内部索引,Epic 11-16 Linear 标题)
必读: 加载 shared/references/meta_analysis_protocol.md
技能类型:planning-coordinator。在所有阶段完成后运行。使用 planning-coordinator 格式输出到聊天。
shared/references/tools_config_guide.mdshared/references/storage_mode_detection.mdshared/references/problem_solving.mdshared/references/orchestrator_pattern.mdshared/references/auto_discovery_pattern.mdshared/references/decompose_first_pattern.mdshared/references/numbering_conventions.md(Epic 0 保留,Linear 编号)shared/references/linear_creation_workflow.mdshared/templates/linear_integration.md)版本: 7.0.0 最后更新: 2025-11-20
每周安装数
153
仓库
GitHub 星标
245
首次出现
2026年1月24日
安全审计
安装于
claude-code139
opencode137
gemini-cli136
codex136
cursor134
github-copilot131
Paths: File paths (
shared/,references/,../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. Ifshared/is missing, fetch files via WebFetch fromhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.
Universal Epic management coordinator that handles both creation and replanning through scope decomposition.
Coordinates Epic creation (CREATE) and replanning (REPLAN) from scope decomposition, producing 3-7 Linear Projects with batch preview, auto-extraction from docs/HTML, and Decompose-First Pattern.
This skill should be used when:
Output: 3-7 Linear Projects (logical domains/modules)
Key principle: ALWAYS analyze scope and build IDEAL Epic plan FIRST, THEN check existing Epics to determine mode:
Rationale: Ensures consistent Epic decomposition based on current scope requirements, independent of existing Epic structure (which may be outdated or suboptimal).
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/numbering_conventions.md for Epic 0 rules, when to use it, and Linear numbering.
| Input | Required | Source | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
scopeDoc | Yes | args, project docs, user | Scope document for Epic decomposition |
Resolution: Epic Resolution Chain (adapted: scope doc discovery). Fallback: IF no scope doc found → AskUserQuestion: "What should be decomposed into Epics?"
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/tools_config_guide.md, shared/references/storage_mode_detection.md, shared/references/input_resolution_pattern.md
Extract: task_provider = Task Management → Provider
Objective: Gather all necessary context before Epic decomposition.
Step 0: Resolve scopeDoc (per input_resolution_pattern.md, adapted for scope):
docs/project/requirements.md exists → use as scope sourcedocs/requirements.md exists → use as scope sourceStep 1: Load Configuration
Auto-discovers Team ID and Next Epic Number from docs/tasks/kanban_board.md:
MANDATORY READ: Load CLAUDE.md — sections "Configuration Auto-Discovery" and "Linear Integration".
Step 2: Project Research
Objective: Research project documentation AND frontend code to understand context BEFORE asking user questions.
Process:
Document Scan:
Glob to find: docs/requirements.md, docs/architecture.md, docs/tech_stack.mdRead to load found documentsFrontend Code Scan (if applicable):
Glob to find: **/*.html, src/**/*.html, public/**/*.html, Example HTML extraction:
<nav>
<a href="/products">Products</a>
<a href="/cart">Shopping Cart</a>
<a href="/checkout">Checkout</a>
</nav>
<!-- Reveals domains: Product Catalog, Shopping Cart, Payment -->
3. Extract key information from docs + HTML:
* **Business objectives:** What is the project trying to achieve? (from requirements.md)
* **User personas:** Who will use the system? (from requirements.md)
* **Major functional domains:** What are the main modules/areas? (from requirements.md, architecture.md, HTML navigation)
* **Technical stack:** What technologies mentioned? (from tech_stack.md, architecture.md, HTML meta/script tags)
* **Infrastructure requirements:** Any mention of logging, monitoring, deployment, CI/CD, security, performance optimization?
4. Combine findings:
* Merge domains from docs + HTML (deduplicate, consolidate similar)
* Example: "User Auth" (from docs) + "Login" (from HTML) → "User Management"
Fallback: If docs AND HTML missing → Skip to Phase 2, will ask user basic questions
Step 3: Infrastructure Epic Decision
Objective: Determine if Infrastructure Epic (Epic 0) should be proposed.
Criteria for Infrastructure Epic:
✅ PROPOSE Infrastructure Epic (Epic 0) if ANY of:
docs/infrastructure.md found, no Epic "Infrastructure" in kanban_board.md Epic Story Counters)❌ DO NOT propose if:
docs/infrastructure.md)Decision: Store YES/NO decision for use in Phase 2
Output from Phase 1:
Objective: Identify logical domains and build Epic structure inline.
Process:
Step 1: Auto-identify Domains
Use research context from Phase 1 Step 2:
Fallback: If no docs/HTML → Ask user basic questions (scope, objectives, functional areas)
Step 2: Build Epic List (inline)
IF Infrastructure needed (from Phase 1 Step 3):
numbering_conventions.md §Epic 0 Content TemplateELSE:
Step 3: Determine Epic Count
Step 4: Show Proposed Epic Structure (USER CONTROL POINT 1)
Display identified Epics with initiative-internal indexes:
📋 Proposed Epic Structure:
Epic 0: Infrastructure & Operations
Epic 1: User Management
Epic 2: Product Catalog
Epic 3: Shopping Cart
Epic 4: Payment Processing
Epic 5: Order Management
Total: 6 Epics
Type "confirm" to proceed, or modify the list
Step 5: User Confirmation
Output: Approved Epic list (Epic 0-N or Epic 1-N) ready for next phase
Context: Structured quality check before creating Epics ensures scope clarity and prevents rework during Story decomposition.
For each proposed Epic, validate 5 criteria:
---|---|---|---
1 | Scope clarity | Clear In/Out boundaries | Vague or overlapping with other Epics
2 | Success criteria | Measurable ("<200ms", ">98%") | Vague ("fast", "reliable")
3 | Risk documentation | Dependencies/blockers identified | Risks section empty or generic
4 | Balance | Similar scope size across Epics (±30%) | One Epic has 80% of work
5 | Independence | No circular Epic dependencies | Epics block each other
Quality Score = count of PASS criteria (0-5)
Objective: Determine CREATE vs REPLAN mode.
Query kanban_board.md and task provider for existing Epics:
list_projects(team=teamId) to cross-check ELSE: Glob("docs/tasks/epics/*/epic.md") to list file-based EpicsDecision Point:
Trigger: Phase 3 determined Count = 0 (CREATE MODE)
Objective: Prepare all Epic documents before batch preview.
Step 1: Auto-extract Information for ALL Domains
For EACH domain (from Phase 2), extract answers to 5 key questions from project documentation:
Q1: Business goal - Why this Epic/domain matters
Q2: Key features in scope - 3-5 bullet points of capabilities
Q3: Out of scope - Prevent scope creep
Q4: Success criteria - Measurable outcomes
If extraction incomplete:
Step 2: Generate ALL Epic Documents
For EACH domain, generate complete Epic document using epic_template_universal.md:
Epic indexing:
Linear Title (will be created in Phase 5a):
Sections: Goal, Scope In/Out, Success Criteria, Dependencies, Risks & Mitigations, Architecture Impact, Phases
Use extracted information from Step 1 for all sections
Output: All Epic documents ready (Epic 0-N), indexed within initiative
Trigger: Phase 4 completed preparation
Objective: Show preview, get confirmation, create all Epics in Linear.
Step 1: Show Batch Preview (USER CONTROL POINT 2)
Display ALL generated Epics with initiative-internal indexes:
📋 Epic Batch Preview (6 Epics to create)
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
Epic 0: Infrastructure & Operations
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
Goal: Establish foundational infrastructure, deployment pipeline, and operational capabilities to support all business Epics
Scope In:
- Logging and error handling framework
- Monitoring and alerting system
- CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions)
- Security baseline (secrets management, encryption)
- Performance optimization (caching, rate limiting)
Scope Out:
- Application-specific business logic
- User-facing features
- Domain-specific integrations
Success Criteria:
- All deployments automated via CI/CD (<10 min deployment time)
- System uptime ≥99.9%
- API response time <200ms (p95)
- Security audit passed
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
Epic 1: User Management
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
Goal: Enable users to register, authenticate, and manage their accounts securely
Scope In:
- User registration with email verification
- Login/logout with JWT authentication
- Password reset flow
- Profile management
Scope Out:
- Social login (OAuth) - planned for Epic 5
- Multi-factor authentication - future version
- User roles and permissions - part of Epic 3
Success Criteria:
- User registration <2 seconds
- Login success rate >98%
- Password reset completion rate >90%
[... all other Epics ...]
───────────────────────────────────────────────
Total: 6 Epics (Epic 0: Infrastructure, Epic 1-5: Business domains)
Type "confirm" to create all Epics in Linear
Step 2: User Confirmation
| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
| User confirms (types "confirm" or approves) | STOP — proceed to creation |
| User feedback cycle >= 3 | STOP — ASK: "3 revision cycles. Proceed with current, or abandon?" |
| Epic Quality Gate score < 3/5 after 2 rework attempts | STOP — ESCALATE: "Cannot achieve quality threshold. Review scope." |
Step 3: Create All Epics
For EACH Epic (in sequential order for numbering consistency):
Get Next Epic Number:
Create Epic (provider-dependent):
IF task_provider == "linear":
* `save_project({name: "Epic {N}: {Title}", description: epic_markdown, team: teamId, state: "planned"})`
* Collect returned URL
ELSE (file mode):
* `mkdir -p docs/tasks/epics/epic-{N}-{slug}/stories/`
* `Write("docs/tasks/epics/epic-{N}-{slug}/epic.md")` with Epic markdown + file headers (`**Status:** Backlog`, `**Created:** {date}`)
3. Update kanban_board.md:
* Increment Next Epic Number by 1 in Linear Configuration table
* Add new row to Epic Story Counters: `Epic {N} | - | US001 | - | EPN_01`
* Add to "Epics Overview" → Active: `- [Epic {N}: Title](link) - Backlog`
4. Collect URL (Linear mode) or file path (file mode)
Step 4: Display Summary
✅ Created 6 Epics for initiative
Epics created:
- Epic 11: Infrastructure & Operations (Epic 0 index) [link]
- Epic 12: User Management (Epic 1 index) [link]
- Epic 13: Product Catalog (Epic 2 index) [link]
- Epic 14: Shopping Cart (Epic 3 index) [link]
- Epic 15: Payment Processing (Epic 4 index) [link]
- Epic 16: Order Management (Epic 5 index) [link]
Next Epic Number updated to: 17
Next Steps:
1. Use ln-220-story-coordinator to create Stories for each Epic (run 6 times)
2. OR use ln-200-scope-decomposer to automate Epic + Story creation
Output: Created Epic URLs + summary
TodoWrite format: Add Phase 1-5a todos + one todo per Epic + kanban update. Mark in_progress/completed.
Trigger: Phase 3 determined Count ≥ 1 (REPLAN MODE)
Full workflow: MANDATORY READ: Load references/replan_workflow.md for complete REPLAN process.
Summary:
docs/tasks/epics/*/epic.md)Constraints: Never auto-update/archive Epics with Stories In Progress. Never delete (use archived). Always require confirmation.
Before completing work, verify ALL checkpoints:
✅ Discovery Complete (Phase 1):
✅ Scope Analysis Complete (Phase 2):
✅ Existing Epics Checked (Phase 3):
✅ Epic Preparation Complete (Phase 4 - CREATE only):
✅ Epic Creation Complete (Phase 5a - CREATE only):
✅ Epic Replan Complete (Phase 5b - REPLAN only):
references/replan_workflow.md for full checklistOutput: List of Linear Project URLs (Epic {N}: {Title}) + Next Epic Number value
Request: "Create epics for e-commerce platform"
Flow: Phase 1 (discover Team ID=Product, Next=11, scan docs+HTML) → Phase 2 (identify 6 domains: Infrastructure, User, Products, Cart, Payment, Orders) → Phase 3 (count=0 → CREATE) → Phase 4 (auto-extract Q1-Q5, generate docs) → Phase 5a (preview, confirm, create in Linear: Epic 11-16)
Result: 6 Epics created (Epic 0-5 internal indexes, Epic 11-16 Linear titles)
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/meta_analysis_protocol.md
Skill type: planning-coordinator. Run after all phases complete. Output to chat using the planning-coordinator format.
shared/references/tools_config_guide.mdshared/references/storage_mode_detection.mdshared/references/problem_solving.mdshared/references/orchestrator_pattern.mdshared/references/auto_discovery_pattern.mdshared/references/decompose_first_pattern.mdshared/references/numbering_conventions.md (Epic 0 reserved, Linear numbering)Version: 7.0.0 Last Updated: 2025-11-20
Weekly Installs
153
Repository
GitHub Stars
245
First Seen
Jan 24, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykWarn
Installed on
claude-code139
opencode137
gemini-cli136
codex136
cursor134
github-copilot131
通过 LiteLLM 代理让 Claude Code 对接 GitHub Copilot 运行 | 高级变通方案指南
36,300 周安装
资深C#开发者技能:精通.NET 8+、ASP.NET Core API、Entity Framework与高性能优化
1,400 周安装
远程浏览器自动化工具 - browser-use 沙盒化代理控制云浏览器
1,500 周安装
Claude技能创建指南:skill-creator教你构建高效AI技能与模块化工具包
1,400 周安装
React Native 升级指南:完整工作流程、依赖更新与 Expo SDK 步骤
1,400 周安装
Brave Search API 网络搜索功能详解:快速获取结构化网页、新闻、视频搜索结果
1,400 周安装
Android Kotlin 项目架构与Gradle配置指南 - 现代Android开发最佳实践
1,400 周安装
templates/**/*.htmlRead to load HTML files<nav>, <a href> links reveal feature areas<h1>, <title> tags reveal feature namesQ5: Known risks (Optional) - Blockers, dependencies
shared/references/linear_creation_workflow.mdshared/templates/linear_integration.md)