npx skills add https://github.com/wondelai/skills --skill blue-ocean-strategy基于同时追求差异化和低成本,创造无竞争市场空间的战略框架。
不要在血腥的红海中竞争。创造无竞争市场空间的蓝海。
大多数公司在现有行业(红海)中争夺市场份额。赢家通过为买家和自身提供价值飞跃,创造竞争无关紧要的新市场空间(蓝海)。
基础: 基于竞争的战略是零和博弈。价值创新创造新需求并打破价值-成本权衡。
目标:10/10。 在评估商业战略或价值主张时,根据蓝海原则进行 0-10 分评分。10/10 分意味着明确的价值创新、消除不必要的因素并创造新需求;较低的分数表明在红海中竞争。始终提供当前分数以及达到 10/10 的改进建议。
| 红海战略 | 蓝海战略 |
|---|---|
| 在现有市场空间中竞争 | 创造无竞争的市场空间 |
| 击败竞争对手 | 使竞争无关紧要 |
| 利用现有需求 | 创造并捕获新需求 |
| 进行价值-成本权衡 | 打破价值-成本权衡 |
| 整个系统与差异化 或 低成本的战略选择保持一致 | 整个系统在追求差异化 和 低成本方面保持一致 |
示例:
红海:
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
蓝海:
参见:references/blue-ocean-examples.md 获取详细案例研究。
价值创新 = 蓝海战略的基石。
定义: 同时追求差异化和低成本,为买家和公司创造价值飞跃。
Value Innovation = Utility × Price × Cost
价值创新逻辑:
| 传统观点 | 价值创新观点 |
|---|---|
| 高价值 = 高成本 | 高价值 可以 = 低成本 |
| 差异化 或 降低成本 | 差异化 和 降低成本 |
| 在既定因素上表现更好 | 新因素,淘汰旧因素 |
运作方式:
结果: 更低的成本结构 和 更优越的价值主张。
示例:太阳马戏团
参见:references/value-innovation.md 获取价值创新框架。
用于理解当前战略定位和发现蓝海的诊断工具。
如何创建战略布局图:
列出行业竞争的所有因素。
示例:葡萄酒行业
绘制你和竞争对手在每个因素上的得分(从低到高)。
典型结果: 每个人的曲线看起来相似(红海)。
问题:
示例:黄尾葡萄酒
| 因素 | 行业平均水平 | 黄尾葡萄酒 |
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | 中高 | 低 |
| 声望 | 高 | 低 |
| 陈年品质 | 高 | 低 |
| 葡萄园传承 | 高 | 低 |
| 复杂性 | 高 | 低 |
| 产品线 | 高 | 低 |
| 易于饮用 | 低 | 高 |
| 趣味/冒险 | 低 | 高 |
| 可及性 | 低 | 高 |
结果: 不同的曲线 = 蓝海。
参见:references/strategy-canvas.md 获取模板和示例。
创造价值创新的工具。
框架:
ELIMINATE RAISE
- Which factors the - Which factors should be
industry takes for raised well above the
granted should be industry standard?
eliminated?
REDUCE CREATE
- Which factors should - Which factors should be
be reduced well below created that the
the industry standard? industry has never
offered?
使用方法:
问题: 我们可以消除哪些行业竞争但为客户增加不了价值的因素?
示例:
好处:
警告: 不要消除买家真正重视的因素。测试假设。
问题: 我们可以提供哪些远低于行业标准的东西?
示例:
好处:
问题: 我们应该将哪些因素提升到远高于行业标准?
示例:
好处:
问题: 我们应该创造哪些行业从未提供过的新因素?
示例:
好处:
综合起来:
| 行动 | 对成本的影响 | 对价值的影响 |
|---|---|---|
| 消除 | ⬇ 降低 | — (如果做得对,没有损失) |
| 减少 | ⬇ 降低 | — (过度服务的领域) |
| 提升 | ⬆ 可能增加 | ⬆ 显著增加 |
| 创造 | ⬆ 可能增加 | ⬆ 显著增加 |
净结果: 价值增长超过成本增长(价值创新)。
参见:references/errc-grid.md 获取 ERRC 模板和练习。
通过超越现有边界来识别蓝海机会的六种方法。
原则: 客户在不同形式之间进行选择。
问题: 你所在行业的替代性行业是什么?
示例:
如何应用: 映射替代品 → 识别它们之间未满足的需求 → 创建解决方案
原则: 行业中有追求相似战略的公司集群。
问题: 有哪些战略集团,你能创建一个新的吗?
示例:
如何应用: 映射战略集团 → 识别过度/服务不足的需求 → 定位在集团之间
原则: 影响购买的人可能不是最终用户。
问题: 我们可以瞄准买方链中的不同买家吗?
链条: 采购者 → 使用者 → 影响者
示例:
如何应用: 识别链条中的所有买家 → 探索被忽视群体的未满足需求
原则: 价值通常受到互补性产品的影响。
问题: 使用你的产品之前、期间和之后会发生什么?
示例:
如何应用: 映射客户的总体验 → 识别痛点 → 捆绑解决方案
原则: 行业通常在功能性或情感性诉求上竞争,很少两者兼顾。
问题: 我们能否为功能性行业增加情感诉求(反之亦然)?
示例:
如何应用: 识别当前诉求 → 探索相反的维度 → 创造混合体
原则: 趋势随着时间塑造行业。
问题: 哪些趋势正在塑造你的行业,你现在如何行动?
示例:
如何应用: 识别不可逆转的趋势 → 预测未来状态 → 今天就为此构建
参见:references/six-paths.md 获取详细的路径练习。
蓝海是通过转化非顾客创造的,而不是窃取竞争对手的顾客。
机会: 小的改变就能赢得他们
示例: Pret A Manger 赢得了快餐的"即将成为"非顾客的忙碌专业人士(想要健康、快速)
机会: 理解他们拒绝的原因,消除障碍
示例: JCDecaux 公交候车亭广告——城市拒绝户外广告,直到 JCDecaux 提供免费的公交候车亭作为交换
机会: 重新定义产品以满足遥远的需求
示例: Callaway Big Bertha 高尔夫球杆——将市场扩展到初学者和偶尔打高尔夫的人(未探索)
流程:
参见:references/non-customers.md 获取非顾客分析框架。
正确的战略顺序:
1. 买方效用 → 2. 战略定价 → 3. 目标成本 → 4. 采用
问题: 是否有卓越的效用?
测试: 你的产品是否为六种效用中的每一种都解锁了买方效用的飞跃?
六种效用杠杆:
买方体验周期: 购买 → 交付 → 使用 → 补充 → 维护 → 处置
目标: 识别效用最大的障碍在哪里,并解决它们。
问题: 定价是否对大众买家可及?
方法: 针对替代品定价(而非针对同一行业的成本或竞争对手)
步骤:
示例: 太阳马戏团定价高于马戏团,低于剧院
问题: 我们能否在保持效用的同时实现目标成本?
公式: 战略定价 - 目标利润率 = 目标成本
方法:
反模式: "我们稍后会实现成本目标"(通常不会发生)
问题: 有哪些采用障碍?
常见障碍:
解决方案:
目标: 清晰的规模化采用路径。
参见:references/sequence.md 获取详细的顺序模板。
| 错误 | 失败原因 | 修正方法 |
|---|---|---|
| 在相同因素上竞争 | 陷入红海 | 使用 ERRC 消除/创造因素 |
| 差异化而不关注成本 | 不是价值创新 | 在提升/创造的同时消除/减少 |
| 渐进主义 | 没有价值飞跃 | 在关键因素上瞄准 10 倍改进 |
| 模仿竞争对手 | 红海思维 | 跨越六条路径寻找替代品 |
| 忽视采用 | 好想法,无执行 | 提前规划采用障碍 |
审计任何战略:
| 问题 | 如果否 | 行动 |
|---|---|---|
| 战略布局图是否显示不同的曲线? | 仍在红海 | 应用 ERRC 框架 |
| 我们是否在消除 和 创造? | 不是价值创新 | 使用所有四个行动 |
| 我们是否打破了价值-成本权衡? | 传统竞争 | 识别过度服务的因素以削减 |
| 我们是否在转化非顾客? | 争夺份额 | 映射非顾客的三个层次 |
| 是否存在买方效用的飞跃? | 渐进式改进 | 在关键效用因素上瞄准 10 倍 |
此技能基于 W. Chan Kim 和 Renée Mauborgne 开发的蓝海战略。完整方法论请参阅:
W. Chan Kim 和 Renée Mauborgne 是欧洲工商管理学院(INSEAD)的战略学教授,也是 INSEAD 蓝海战略研究所的联合主任。他们关于价值创新和蓝海战略的研究已发表在顶级学术期刊上。《蓝海战略》已售出超过 400 万册,被翻译成 46 种语言,是有史以来最畅销的商业书籍之一。他们与全球的公司和政府合作,进行战略更新和增长。
每周安装量
254
代码库
GitHub 星标
255
首次出现
Feb 10, 2026
安全审计
安装于
opencode234
codex231
gemini-cli231
github-copilot228
cursor227
amp226
Strategic framework for creating uncontested market space that makes the competition irrelevant, based on simultaneous pursuit of differentiation and low cost.
Don't compete in bloody red oceans. Create blue oceans of uncontested market space.
Most companies fight for market share in existing industries (red oceans). Winners create new market space where competition is irrelevant (blue oceans) by delivering a leap in value for both buyers and themselves.
The foundation: Competition-based strategy is zero-sum. Value innovation creates new demand and breaks the value-cost trade-off.
Goal: 10/10. When evaluating business strategy or value proposition, rate 0-10 based on blue ocean principles. A 10/10 means clear value innovation, elimination of unnecessary factors, and creation of new demand; lower scores indicate competing in red oceans. Always provide current score and improvements to reach 10/10.
| Red Ocean Strategy | Blue Ocean Strategy |
|---|---|
| Compete in existing market space | Create uncontested market space |
| Beat the competition | Make competition irrelevant |
| Exploit existing demand | Create and capture new demand |
| Make value-cost trade-off | Break value-cost trade-off |
| Align whole system with strategic choice of differentiation OR low cost | Align whole system in pursuit of differentiation AND low cost |
Examples:
Red Ocean:
Blue Ocean:
See: references/blue-ocean-examples.md for detailed case studies.
Value innovation = the cornerstone of blue ocean strategy.
Definition: Simultaneous pursuit of differentiation and low cost, creating a leap in value for both buyers and company.
Value Innovation = Utility × Price × Cost
The value innovation logic:
| Traditional View | Value Innovation View |
|---|---|
| High value = High cost | High value CAN = Low cost |
| Differentiate OR cut costs | Differentiate AND cut costs |
| Better performance on established factors | New factors, eliminate old factors |
How it works:
Result: Lower cost structure AND superior value proposition.
Example: Cirque du Soleil
See: references/value-innovation.md for value innovation frameworks.
The diagnostic tool for understanding current strategic position and discovering blue oceans.
How to create a Strategy Canvas:
List all the factors the industry competes on.
Example: Wine industry
Plot how you and competitors score on each factor (low to high).
Typical result: Everyone's curves look similar (red ocean).
Questions:
Example: Yellow Tail Wine
| Factor | Industry Average | Yellow Tail |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Medium-High | LOW |
| Prestige | High | LOW |
| Aging quality | High | LOW |
| Vineyard legacy | High | LOW |
| Complexity | High | LOW |
| Range | High | LOW |
| Easy drinking | Low | HIGH |
| Fun/adventure | Low | HIGH |
| Accessibility | Low | HIGH |
Result: Different curve = blue ocean.
See: references/strategy-canvas.md for templates and examples.
The tool for creating value innovation.
The framework:
ELIMINATE RAISE
- Which factors the - Which factors should be
industry takes for raised well above the
granted should be industry standard?
eliminated?
REDUCE CREATE
- Which factors should - Which factors should be
be reduced well below created that the
the industry standard? industry has never
offered?
How to use:
Question: What can we eliminate that the industry competes on but adds no value for customers?
Examples:
Benefits:
Warning: Don't eliminate factors buyers truly value. Test assumptions.
Question: What can we offer well below industry standard?
Examples:
Benefits:
Question: What should we raise well above industry standard?
Examples:
Benefits:
Question: What new factors should we create that the industry has never offered?
Examples:
Benefits:
Putting it together:
| Action | Effect on Cost | Effect on Value |
|---|---|---|
| Eliminate | ⬇ Reduces | — (no loss if done right) |
| Reduce | ⬇ Reduces | — (over-served area) |
| Raise | ⬆ May increase | ⬆ Increases significantly |
| Create | ⬆ May increase | ⬆ Increases significantly |
Net result: Value increases more than cost (value innovation).
See: references/errc-grid.md for ERRC templates and exercises.
Six ways to identify blue ocean opportunities by looking beyond existing boundaries.
Principle: Customers choose between alternatives in different forms.
Question: What are the alternative industries to yours?
Example:
How to apply: Map alternatives → identify unmet needs across them → create solution
Principle: Industries have clusters of companies pursuing similar strategies.
Question: What are the strategic groups, and can you create a new one?
Example:
How to apply: Map strategic groups → identify over/under-served needs → position between groups
Principle: Who influences the purchase may not be the end user.
Question: Can we target a different buyer in the chain?
Chain: Purchasers → Users → Influencers
Example:
How to apply: Identify all buyers in chain → explore unmet needs of overlooked groups
Principle: Value is often affected by complementary products.
Question: What happens before, during, and after using your product?
Example:
How to apply: Map customer's total experience → identify pain points → bundle solutions
Principle: Industries compete on either functional or emotional appeal, rarely both.
Question: Can we add emotional appeal to functional industries (or vice versa)?
Examples:
How to apply: Identify current appeal → explore opposite dimension → create hybrid
Principle: Trends shape industries over time.
Question: What trends are shaping your industry, and how can you act on them now?
Example:
How to apply: Identify irreversible trends → project future state → build for it today
See: references/six-paths.md for detailed path exercises.
Blue oceans are created by converting non-customers, not stealing competitors' customers.
Opportunity: Small shifts could win them over
Example: Pret A Manger won busy professionals who were "soon-to-be" non-customers of fast food (wanted healthy, fast)
Opportunity: Understand why they refuse, eliminate barriers
Example: JCDecaux bus-shelter advertising—cities refused outdoor ads until JCDecaux offered free bus shelters in exchange
Opportunity: Reframe offering to serve distant needs
Example: Callaway Big Bertha golf clubs—expanded market to beginners and occasional golfers (unexplored)
Process:
See: references/non-customers.md for non-customer analysis frameworks.
The right strategic sequence:
1. Buyer Utility → 2. Strategic Price → 3. Target Cost → 4. Adoption
Question: Is there exceptional utility?
Test: Does your offering unlock a leap in buyer utility for each of the six utilities?
Six utility levers:
Buyer Experience Cycle: Purchase → Delivery → Use → Supplements → Maintenance → Disposal
Goal: Identify where the biggest blocks to utility are, and solve them.
Question: Is pricing accessible to mass of buyers?
Approach: Price against alternatives (not costs or competitors in same industry)
Steps:
Example: Cirque du Soleil priced higher than circus, lower than theater
Question: Can we achieve target cost while preserving utility?
Formula: Strategic Price - Target Profit Margin = Target Cost
Approach:
Anti-pattern: "We'll achieve cost target later" (usually doesn't happen)
Question: What are the adoption hurdles?
Common hurdles:
Solutions:
Goal: Clear path to scalable adoption.
See: references/sequence.md for detailed sequence templates.
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Competing on same factors | Stuck in red ocean | Use ERRC to eliminate/create factors |
| Differentiation without cost focus | Not value innovation | Eliminate/reduce while raising/creating |
| Incrementalism | No leap in value | Aim for 10x improvement on key factors |
| Imitating competitors | Red ocean thinking | Look across six paths for alternatives |
| Ignoring adoption | Great idea, no execution | Plan for adoption hurdles upfront |
Audit any strategy:
| Question | If No | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Does Strategy Canvas show different curve? | Still in red ocean | Apply ERRC framework |
| Are we eliminating AND creating? | Not value innovation | Use all four actions |
| Are we breaking value-cost trade-off? | Traditional competition | Identify over-served factors to cut |
| Are we converting non-customers? | Fighting for share | Map three tiers of non-customers |
| Is there a leap in buyer utility? | Incremental improvement | Aim for 10x on key utility factors |
This skill is based on Blue Ocean Strategy developed by W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne. For complete methodology:
W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne are professors of strategy at INSEAD and co-directors of the INSEAD Blue Ocean Strategy Institute. Their research on value innovation and blue ocean strategy has been published in top academic journals. Blue Ocean Strategy has sold over 4 million copies, been translated into 46 languages, and is one of the best-selling business books of all time. They work with companies and governments worldwide on strategic renewal and growth.
Weekly Installs
254
Repository
GitHub Stars
255
First Seen
Feb 10, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
opencode234
codex231
gemini-cli231
github-copilot228
cursor227
amp226
AI代理协作核心原则:提升开发效率的6大Agentic开发原则指南
7,600 周安装