using-superpowers by sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill using-superpowers如果某项技能适用于你的任务,你别无选择。必须使用它。
这没有商量余地。这不是可选的。你不能通过合理化来规避这一点。
在 Claude Code 中: 使用 Skill 工具。当你调用一个技能时,其内容会被加载并呈现给你——请直接遵循它。切勿对技能文件使用 Read 工具。
在其他环境中: 请查阅你所在平台的文档,了解如何加载技能。
在任何回应或行动之前,先调用相关或被请求的技能。 即使某项技能只有 1% 的适用可能,你也应该调用该技能来检查。如果调用的技能最终不适用于当前情况,你无需使用它。
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
产生以下想法意味着你需要停下来——你正在合理化你的行为:
| 想法 | 现实 |
|---|---|
| "这只是个简单的问题" | 问题就是任务。检查是否有适用的技能。 |
| "我需要先了解更多背景信息" | 技能检查应优先于澄清问题。 |
| "让我先探索一下代码库" | 技能会告诉你如何探索。先检查技能。 |
| "我可以快速检查 git/文件" | 文件缺乏对话上下文。先检查技能。 |
| "让我先收集信息" | 技能会告诉你如何收集信息。 |
| "这不需要一个正式的技能" | 如果存在相关技能,就使用它。 |
| "我记得这个技能" | 技能会更新。阅读当前版本。 |
| "这不算一个任务" | 行动 = 任务。检查是否有适用的技能。 |
| "这个技能太小题大做了" | 简单的事情可能变得复杂。使用它。 |
| "我先做这一件事" | 在做任何事情之前先检查技能。 |
| "这感觉很有效率" | 未经规划的行动会浪费时间。技能可以防止这种情况。 |
| "我知道那是什么意思" | 知道概念 ≠ 使用技能。调用它。 |
当多个技能可能适用时,请按以下顺序使用:
例如:"让我们构建 X" → 先使用头脑风暴技能,然后使用实现类技能。"修复这个 bug" → 先使用调试技能,然后使用特定领域的技能。
严格型(TDD、调试):严格遵守。不要偏离其规定的步骤。
灵活型(模式):根据上下文调整原则。
技能本身会告诉你它属于哪种类型。
指令说明的是做什么,而不是怎么做。"添加 X" 或 "修复 Y" 并不意味着可以跳过工作流程。
本技能适用于执行概述中描述的工作流程或操作。
每周安装量
276
代码仓库
GitHub 星标数
27.1K
首次出现
2026年1月19日
安全审计
安装于
opencode226
gemini-cli223
claude-code216
antigravity200
codex195
cursor190
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
In other environments: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills. "Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
Rigid (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
Flexible (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
The skill itself tells you which.
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
Weekly Installs
276
Repository
GitHub Stars
27.1K
First Seen
Jan 19, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykWarn
Installed on
opencode226
gemini-cli223
claude-code216
antigravity200
codex195
cursor190
agent-browser 浏览器自动化工具 - Vercel Labs 命令行网页操作与测试
140,500 周安装
React useEffect 使用指南:何时需要与何时避免 Effect 的最佳实践
272 周安装
Seedance 2.0 分镜提示词生成器 - AI视频创作助手,多模态输入生成专业分镜
272 周安装
App Store Connect ASO 审核工具:自动化元数据检查和关键词差距分析
272 周安装
SQLAlchemy Alembic 专家最佳实践与代码审查指南 - 生产级数据库迁移优化
272 周安装
Django部署Google Cloud SQL PostgreSQL教程:10分钟快速配置与生产环境设置
272 周安装
代码复杂度分析工具:Python/Go代码质量检测与重构指南
273 周安装