sprint-retrospective by akillness/oh-my-skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill sprint-retrospective## 回顾模板:开始-停止-继续
### START (开始做)
- 缩短每日站会(在 5 分钟内)
- 使用代码审查清单
- 引入结对编程
### STOP (停止做)
- 周五下午部署(存在回滚风险)
- 过度使用紧急会议
- 添加功能时不编写文档
### CONTINUE (继续做)
- 每周技术分享会
- 自动化测试
- 透明的沟通
### 行动项
1. [ ] 将站会时间从 9:00 改为 9:30 (团队负责人)
2. [ ] 编写代码审查清单文档 (开发人员 A)
3. [ ] 宣布"周五不部署"规则 (团队负责人)
## 回顾:恼火-遗憾-高兴
### MAD (让我们恼火的事情)
- 部署后出现紧急 Bug(两次)
- 需求频繁变更
- 测试环境不稳定
### SAD (我们希望做得更好的事情)
- 代码审查时间不足
- 文档滞后
- 技术债务累积
### GLAD (让我们高兴的事情)
- 新团队成员快速上手
- CI/CD 流水线稳定
- 收到积极的客户反馈
### 行动项
- 加强部署检查清单
- 改进需求变更流程
- 每周五预留文档编写时间
## 回顾:4Ls
### LIKED (我们喜欢的事情)
- 团队协作良好
- 成功采用了新技术栈
### LEARNED (我们学到的事情)
- 使用 Docker Compose 标准化本地环境
- 使用 React Query 改进服务器状态管理
### LACKED (我们缺少的事情)
- 性能测试
- 移动端支持
### LONGED FOR (我们渴望的事情)
- 更好的开发者工具
- 外部培训机会
### 行动项
- 通过引入 Lighthouse CI 自动测量性能
- 编写响应式设计指南
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
# 冲刺 [N] 回顾
**日期**: 2025-01-15
**参与者**: 团队成员 A, B, C, D
**格式**: 开始-停止-继续
## 做得好的方面
- 完成了所有用户故事 (速度: 25 点)
- 0 个 Bug
- 团队士气高昂
## 做得不好的方面
- 技术调研花费的时间超出预期
- 由于设计变更导致返工
## 行动项
1. [ ] 将技术调研分配到专门的冲刺中 (团队负责人, ~01/20)
2. [ ] 引入设计预审流程 (设计师, ~01/18)
3. [ ] 分享速度图表 (Scrum Master, 每周)
## 关键指标
- 速度: 25 点
- 发现的 Bug 数量: 0
- 冲刺目标达成率: 100%
#retrospective #agile #scrum #team-improvement #project-management
每周安装量
1
仓库
GitHub 星标数
3
首次出现
1 天前
安全审计
安装于
mcpjam1
claude-code1
junie1
windsurf1
zencoder1
crush1
## Retrospective Template: Start-Stop-Continue
### START (Start doing)
- Make daily standups shorter (within 5 minutes)
- Use a code review checklist
- Introduce pair programming
### STOP (Stop doing)
- Deploying on Friday afternoons (rollback risk)
- Overusing emergency meetings
- Adding features without documentation
### CONTINUE (Keep doing)
- Weekly tech sharing session
- Automated tests
- Transparent communication
### Action Items
1. [ ] Change standup time from 9:00 → 9:30 (Team Lead)
2. [ ] Write a code review checklist document (Developer A)
3. [ ] Announce the "no Friday deployments" rule (Team Lead)
## Retrospective: Mad-Sad-Glad
### MAD (What made us mad)
- Urgent bugs after deployment (twice)
- Requirements changed frequently
- Unstable test environment
### SAD (What we wished went better)
- Not enough time for code reviews
- Documentation lagged behind
- Accumulating tech debt
### GLAD (What made us glad)
- New team members onboarded quickly
- CI/CD pipeline stabilized
- Positive customer feedback
### Action Items
- Strengthen the deployment checklist
- Improve the requirements change process
- Reserve documentation time every Friday
## Retrospective: 4Ls
### LIKED (What we liked)
- Great teamwork
- Successfully adopted a new tech stack
### LEARNED (What we learned)
- Standardize the local environment with Docker Compose
- Improve server state management with React Query
### LACKED (What we lacked)
- Performance testing
- Mobile support
### LONGED FOR (What we longed for)
- Better developer tools
- External training opportunities
### Action Items
- Automatically measure performance by introducing Lighthouse CI
- Write responsive design guidelines
# Sprint [N] Retrospective
**Date**: 2025-01-15
**Participants**: Team Member A, B, C, D
**Format**: Start-Stop-Continue
## What Went Well
- Completed all stories (Velocity: 25 points)
- 0 bugs
- Great team morale
## What Didn't Go Well
- Tech spike took longer than expected
- Rework due to design changes
## Action Items
1. [ ] Assign tech spikes to a dedicated sprint (Team Lead, ~01/20)
2. [ ] Introduce a pre-review process for designs (Designer, ~01/18)
3. [ ] Share the velocity chart (Scrum Master, weekly)
## Key Metrics
- Velocity: 25 points
- Bugs Found: 0
- Sprint Goal Achievement: 100%
#retrospective #agile #scrum #team-improvement #project-management
Weekly Installs
1
Repository
GitHub Stars
3
First Seen
1 day ago
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
mcpjam1
claude-code1
junie1
windsurf1
zencoder1
crush1
BMAD工作流编排与SSD结构化系统设计 - 多代理AI开发流程自动化
10,600 周安装