ui-ux-polish by dicklesworthstone/agent_flywheel_clawdbot_skills_and_integrations
npx skills add https://github.com/dicklesworthstone/agent_flywheel_clawdbot_skills_and_integrations --skill ui-ux-polish使用时机: 适用于你的网站/应用已经可以正常工作且看起来不错,但你想进一步改进它的情况。如果它看起来很糟糕且需要彻底重做,则应采用不同的方法。
关键洞察: 向模型征求同意("你同意吗?")的方式似乎能激励它更好地打磨细节。此外,指示它分别思考桌面端和移动端的设计,能带来更好的结果。
这个提示词使用非常频繁,值得放在 Stream Deck 按钮上:
I still think there are strong opportunities to enhance the UI/UX look and feel and to make everything work better and be more intuitive, user-friendly, visually appealing, polished, slick, and world class in terms of following UI/UX best practices like those used by Stripe, don't you agree? And I want you to carefully consider desktop UI/UX and mobile UI/UX separately while doing this and hyper-optimize for both separately to play to the specifics of each modality. I'm looking for true world-class visual appeal, polish, slickness, etc. that makes people gasp at how stunning and perfect it is in every way. Use ultrathink.
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
"don't you agree?" 这个短语促使模型思考改进是否可能,而不仅仅是执行指令。
"carefully consider desktop UI/UX and mobile UI/UX separately...
hyper-optimize for both separately to play to the specifics of each modality"
这可以防止模型做出在两端都"还行"但在任何一端都不出色的折中方案。
参考点:
这些锚点推动模型达到比通用的"让它更好"指令更高的质量。
扩展思考允许模型:
| 模型 | 效果 |
|---|---|
| Claude Code + Opus 4.5 | 优秀 |
| Codex + GPT 5.2 (高/超高推理) | 优秀 |
| Gemini CLI | 良好 |
此提示词适用于:
# First pass
[Run the UI/UX polish prompt]
# Review changes
[Agent makes improvements]
# Second pass
[Run the same prompt again]
# Repeat 10+ times until changes become minimal
你可以让多个智能体同时处理 UI/UX 打磨:
对于彻底的重做,请使用不同的方法,首先专注于建立设计系统和组件库。
每次迭代后,你可能会注意到:
这些微小的变化会累积起来。经过 10 次迭代的应用看起来比经过 1 次迭代的要好得多。
对于系统性的 UI/UX 工作,创建 beads:
br create "Polish homepage UI/UX for desktop" -t enhancement -p 2
br create "Polish homepage UI/UX for mobile" -t enhancement -p 2
br create "Polish dashboard UI/UX for desktop" -t enhancement -p 2
br create "Polish dashboard UI/UX for mobile" -t enhancement -p 2
这可以让智能体作为常规 bead 工作流的一部分来处理 UI/UX 打磨。
I still think there are strong opportunities to enhance the UI/UX look and feel and to make everything work better and be more intuitive, user-friendly, visually appealing, polished, slick, and world class in terms of following UI/UX best practices like those used by Stripe, don't you agree? And I want you to carefully consider desktop UI/UX and mobile UI/UX separately while doing this and hyper-optimize for both separately to play to the specifics of each modality. I'm looking for true world-class visual appeal, polish, slickness, etc. that makes people gasp at how stunning and perfect it is in every way. Use ultrathink.
Great, now I want you to super carefully scrutinize every aspect of the application workflow and implementation and look for things that just seem sub-optimal or even wrong/mistaken to you, things that could very obviously be improved from a user-friendliness and intuitiveness standpoint, places where our UI/UX could be improved and polished to be slicker, more visually appealing, and more premium feeling and just ultra high quality, like Stripe-level apps.
每周安装次数
131
代码仓库
GitHub 星标数
61
首次出现
2026年1月20日
安全审计
安装于
claude-code109
opencode108
gemini-cli104
codex102
cursor90
github-copilot85
When to Use: This is for when your site/app already works and looks decent and you want to improve it. There's a different approach when it looks bad and needs a complete overhaul.
Key Insight: Something about asking for agreement from the model ("don't you agree?") somehow motivates it to polish things up better. Also, instructing it to separately think through desktop vs mobile leads to much better outcomes.
This prompt is used so frequently it's worth putting on a Stream Deck button:
I still think there are strong opportunities to enhance the UI/UX look and feel and to make everything work better and be more intuitive, user-friendly, visually appealing, polished, slick, and world class in terms of following UI/UX best practices like those used by Stripe, don't you agree? And I want you to carefully consider desktop UI/UX and mobile UI/UX separately while doing this and hyper-optimize for both separately to play to the specifics of each modality. I'm looking for true world-class visual appeal, polish, slickness, etc. that makes people gasp at how stunning and perfect it is in every way. Use ultrathink.
The phrase "don't you agree?" engages the model's reasoning about whether improvements are possible, rather than just executing instructions.
"carefully consider desktop UI/UX and mobile UI/UX separately...
hyper-optimize for both separately to play to the specifics of each modality"
This prevents the model from making compromises that work "okay" on both but great on neither.
References:
These anchors push the model toward higher quality than generic "make it better" instructions.
Extended thinking allows the model to:
| Model | Effectiveness |
|---|---|
| Claude Code + Opus 4.5 | Excellent |
| Codex + GPT 5.2 (High/Extra-High reasoning) | Excellent |
| Gemini CLI | Good |
This prompt works with:
# First pass
[Run the UI/UX polish prompt]
# Review changes
[Agent makes improvements]
# Second pass
[Run the same prompt again]
# Repeat 10+ times until changes become minimal
You can have more than one agent working on UI/UX polish simultaneously:
For complete overhauls, use a different approach focused on establishing a design system and component library first.
After each iteration, you might notice:
These small changes compound. An app after 10 passes looks dramatically better than after 1 pass.
For systematic UI/UX work, create beads:
br create "Polish homepage UI/UX for desktop" -t enhancement -p 2
br create "Polish homepage UI/UX for mobile" -t enhancement -p 2
br create "Polish dashboard UI/UX for desktop" -t enhancement -p 2
br create "Polish dashboard UI/UX for mobile" -t enhancement -p 2
This lets agents work on UI/UX polish as part of the normal bead workflow.
I still think there are strong opportunities to enhance the UI/UX look and feel and to make everything work better and be more intuitive, user-friendly, visually appealing, polished, slick, and world class in terms of following UI/UX best practices like those used by Stripe, don't you agree? And I want you to carefully consider desktop UI/UX and mobile UI/UX separately while doing this and hyper-optimize for both separately to play to the specifics of each modality. I'm looking for true world-class visual appeal, polish, slickness, etc. that makes people gasp at how stunning and perfect it is in every way. Use ultrathink.
Great, now I want you to super carefully scrutinize every aspect of the application workflow and implementation and look for things that just seem sub-optimal or even wrong/mistaken to you, things that could very obviously be improved from a user-friendliness and intuitiveness standpoint, places where our UI/UX could be improved and polished to be slicker, more visually appealing, and more premium feeling and just ultra high quality, like Stripe-level apps.
Weekly Installs
131
Repository
GitHub Stars
61
First Seen
Jan 20, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
claude-code109
opencode108
gemini-cli104
codex102
cursor90
github-copilot85
Flutter布局指南:构建响应式UI的约束规则与自适应设计模式
1,200 周安装