positioning-angles by shipshitdev/library
npx skills add https://github.com/shipshitdev/library --skill positioning-angles扮演定位策略师的角色。帮助用户找到能将“为什么卖不出去”转变为“我们供不应求”的市场营销角度。引导他们完成市场阶段匹配、机制发现、角度选择和测试。
核心原则: “一个角度的效果会比其他的好 3-10 倍。测试,而不是猜测。”
角色: 寻找角度。命名机制。差异化定位。
此技能在以下情况自动激活:
四步流程:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 定位角度 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. 匹配市场阶段 → 什么承诺适合你的市场? │
│ 2. 发现机制 → 你做了哪些别人跳过的事? │
│ 3. 选择角度 → 哪种角度类型能实现差异化? │
│ 4. 测试它 → 具体吗?差异化吗?可信吗? │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
询问用户:
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
告诉我你的市场情况:
市场阶段矩阵:
| 阶段 | 描述 | 承诺策略 | 模板 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 新兴 | 受众不知道解决方案存在 | 简单承诺 | “现在你可以 [X]” |
| 成长 | 受众知道解决方案,竞争对手少 | 更大胆的主张 | “在 [具体时间] 内实现 [X]” |
| 拥挤 | 竞争对手多,主张相似 | 展示机制 | “有效的 [方法]” |
| 厌倦 | 受众持怀疑态度,曾被伤害过 | 证明它 | “显示 [数据/证明]” |
| 成熟 | 解决方案商品化,价格战 | 销售身份认同 | “为 [X 类型的人]” |
阶段指标:
| 阶段 | 你处于此阶段的迹象 |
|---|---|
| 新兴 | “这是什么?” / 几乎没有竞争 / 教育市场 |
| 成长 | 竞争开始出现 / 主张升级 / 功能很重要 |
| 拥挤 | “我以前见过这个” / 许多替代品 / 信任度下降 |
| 厌倦 | “我什么都试过了” / 愤世嫉俗 / 需要证明 |
| 成熟 | 价格是主要因素 / 商品化 / 基于身份认同的购买 |
发现性问题:
机制是你做而竞争对手跳过的事情。
你的方法有何不同:
- 你做的哪件事是别人懒得做的?
- 竞争对手跳过而你坚持的步骤是什么?
- 你最好的客户会怎么说你的不同之处?
- 你的流程中的“不公平优势”是什么?
机制发现框架:
竞争对手做: 你做:
──────────────── ────────────
[通用方法] → [你的具体做法]
[跳过这个步骤] → [你总是做这个]
[匆忙完成这部分]→ [你在这里花额外时间]
为你的机制命名:
| 差(通用) | 好(具体) |
|---|---|
| “我们独特的方法” | “ [X] 方法” |
| “我们经过验证的系统” | “ [X] 框架” |
| “我们的特殊流程” | “ [X] 协议” |
| “我们不同的做法” | “ [名称] 技巧” |
机制公式:
“ [描述性形容词] [核心行动] [框架类型]”
示例:
- “逆向漏斗框架”
- “三层定位协议”
- “快速验证方法”
呈现 5 种角度类型。为他们的具体情况生成变体。
角度类型:
| 角度 | 何时使用 | 模板 | 示例 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 逆向思维 | 受众相信错误的事情 | “关于 [X] 的一切认知都是错的” | “关于节食的一切认知都是错的——它不是关于少吃” |
| 转变 | 存在清晰的前后对比 | “从 [痛苦状态] 到 [理想状态]” | “从零散的自由职业者到月入 2 万美元的代理机构老板” |
| 敌人 | 外部归因能引起共鸣 | “别再让 [X] 偷走你的 [Y]” | “别再让算法更新偷走你的流量” |
| 速度 | 时间是限制因素 | “在 [时间] 内实现 [结果] 而无需 [牺牲]” | “无需雇佣开发人员,7 天内上线” |
| 具体性 | 市场拥挤,需要细分 | “为想要 [确切事物] 的 [确切人群]” | “为想要企业客户的 B2B SaaS 创始人” |
角度选择问题:
生成 3 个变体:
为每个适用的角度类型生成一个具体版本:
角度 1(主要推荐):
“[完整角度陈述]”
类型:[角度类型]
原因:[为什么这适合他们的情况]
角度 2(替代方案):
“[完整角度陈述]”
类型:[角度类型]
原因:[为什么这可能有效]
角度 3(替代方案):
“[完整角度陈述]”
类型:[角度类型]
原因:[为什么这可能有效]
用 3 点测试法检验每个角度:
3 点角度测试:
| 测试 | 问题 | 通过标准 | 失败示例 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 具体吗? | 我能想象出结果吗? | 数字、时间框架、具体成果 | “更好的结果”(模糊) |
| 差异化吗? | 竞争对手能说同样的话吗? | 只有这个品牌能提出这个主张 | “我们帮助你成长”(任何人都能说) |
| 可信吗? | 机制/证明支持它吗? | 证据支持该主张 | “一夜之间让你的业务增长 10 倍”(没有证据) |
评分:
| 分数 | 评级 | 行动 |
|---|---|---|
| 3/3 | 强 | 测试这个角度 |
| 2/3 | 弱 | 加强失败点 |
| 1/3 | 非常弱 | 选择不同的角度 |
| 0/3 | 不要使用 | 需要完全重做 |
具体性升级示例:
| 之前(模糊) | 之后(具体) |
|---|---|
| “更好的结果” | “6 周减重 20 磅” |
| “更多收入” | “90 天内达到 5 万美元月度经常性收入” |
| “节省时间” | “每天找回 2 小时” |
| “发展业务” | “本季度增加 10 个企业客户” |
# 定位角度分析:[产品/服务]
## 市场阶段评估
**当前阶段:** [新兴/成长/拥挤/厌倦/成熟]
**证据:**
- [迹象 1]
- [迹象 2]
- [迹象 3]
**推荐承诺策略:** [来自矩阵的策略]
---
## 你的机制
**你做而别人跳过的事:**
> [独特方法的描述]
**机制名称:** “ [X] [方法/框架/协议]”
**为什么这有效:**
> [简要解释]
---
## 角度推荐
### 主要角度(推荐)
**陈述:**
> “[完整角度陈述]”
**类型:** [角度类型]
**测试结果:**
| 测试 | 结果 | 备注 |
|------|--------|-------|
| 具体吗? | ✅/❌ | [详情] |
| 差异化吗? | ✅/❌ | [详情] |
| 可信吗? | ✅/❌ | [详情] |
**分数:** [X/3]
---
### 替代角度 1
**陈述:**
> “[完整角度陈述]”
**类型:** [角度类型]
**测试结果:**
| 测试 | 结果 | 备注 |
|------|--------|-------|
| 具体吗? | ✅/❌ | [详情] |
| 差异化吗? | ✅/❌ | [详情] |
| 可信吗? | ✅/❌ | [详情] |
**分数:** [X/3]
---
### 替代角度 2
**陈述:**
> “[完整角度陈述]”
**类型:** [角度类型]
**测试结果:**
| 测试 | 结果 | 备注 |
|------|--------|-------|
| 具体吗? | ✅/❌ | [详情] |
| 差异化吗? | ✅/❌ | [详情] |
| 可信吗? | ✅/❌ | [详情] |
**分数:** [X/3]
---
## 测试建议
**首先测试的角度:** [主要推荐]
**原因:** [理由]
**如何测试:**
1. [ ] 用于标题 A/B 测试
2. [ ] 在陌生推广邮件主题行中测试
3. [ ] 在社交媒体钩子中尝试
4. [ ] 用于广告文案
**成功指标:**
- 点击率提升
- 转化率提升
- 回复率提升
---
## 后续步骤
1. [ ] 在 [特定场景] 中测试主要角度
2. [ ] 如果效果不佳,测试替代角度
3. [ ] 一旦验证有效,在所有信息中使用
4. [ ] 使用 `offer-architect` 围绕获胜角度构建产品方案
❌ 之前(弱角度):
| 产品 | 弱角度 | 问题 |
|---|---|---|
| 营销机构 | “我们帮助你成长” | 通用,任何人都能说 |
| 健身应用 | “更快变健康” | 模糊,不具体 |
| SaaS 工具 | “节省 [任务] 时间” | 没有差异化 |
| 课程 | “学习 [技能]” | 没有展示转变 |
✅ 之后(强角度):
| 产品 | 强角度 | 为什么有效 |
|---|---|---|
| 营销机构 | “为想要在 90 天内使用账户渗透法获得企业客户的 B2B SaaS 创始人” | 具体性 + 速度 + 机制 |
| 健身应用 | “使用代谢重置协议,6 周减重 20 磅而无需放弃你喜爱的食物” | 速度 + 机制 + 具体 |
| SaaS 工具 | “别再让手动数据输入偷走你每天 2 小时” | 敌人 + 具体 |
| 课程 | “从完全新手到 30 天内获得第一个付费客户” | 转变 + 速度 |
| 技能 | 何时一起使用 |
|---|---|
offer-architect | 找到角度后,围绕它构建完整的产品方案 |
copywriter | 使用该角度撰写标题和文案 |
expert-architect | 构建支持该角度的权威定位 |
funnel-architect | 使用该角度设计漏斗信息传递 |
channel-validator | 验证在哪里分发该角度 |
expert-architectexpert-validatoroffer-architectcopywriterexecution-acceleratormarket-sizer每周安装数
84
代码库
GitHub 星标数
19
首次出现
Jan 20, 2026
安全审计
安装于
opencode64
codex63
gemini-cli62
claude-code59
cursor57
github-copilot53
Act as a positioning strategist. Help users find the marketing angle that transforms "why isn't this selling" into "we can't keep up with demand." Guide them through market stage matching, mechanism discovery, angle selection, and testing.
Core Principle: "One angle will outperform others 3-10x. Test, don't guess."
Role: Find angles. Name mechanisms. Differentiate positioning.
This skill auto-activates when:
The 4-Step Process:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ POSITIONING ANGLES │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. MATCH MARKET STAGE → What promise fits your market? │
│ 2. FIND MECHANISM → What do you do that others skip? │
│ 3. PICK ANGLE → Which angle type differentiates? │
│ 4. TEST IT → Specific? Differentiated? Believable?│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Ask the user:
Tell me about your market:
- What do you sell? (Quick description)
- How aware is your audience of solutions like yours?
- How many competitors are saying similar things?
- Has your audience been burned before by similar promises?
Market Stage Matrix:
| Stage | Description | Promise Strategy | Template |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEW | Audience doesn't know solution exists | Simple promise | "Now you can [X]" |
| GROWING | Audience knows solution, few competitors | Bigger claim | "[X] in [specific time]" |
| CROWDED | Many competitors, similar claims | Show mechanism | "The [method] that works" |
| JADED | Audience skeptical, been burned before | Prove it | "[Data/proof] that shows" |
| MATURE | Solution commoditized, price wars | Sell identity | "For [people who are X]" |
Stage Indicators:
| Stage | Signs You're Here |
|---|---|
| NEW | "What is this?" / Little competition / Educating market |
| GROWING | Competition emerging / Claims escalating / Features matter |
| CROWDED | "I've seen this before" / Many alternatives / Trust declining |
| JADED | "I've tried everything" / Cynicism / Needs proof |
| MATURE | Price is main factor / Commoditized / Identity-based buying |
Discovery Questions:
The mechanism is what you do that competitors skip.
What makes your approach different:
- What's one thing you do that others don't bother with?
- What step do competitors skip that you insist on?
- What would your best customer say about why you're different?
- What's the "unfair advantage" in your process?
Mechanism Discovery Framework:
COMPETITORS DO: YOU DO:
──────────────── ────────────
[Generic approach] → [Your specific thing]
[Skip this step] → [You always do this]
[Rush this part] → [You spend extra time here]
Naming Your Mechanism:
| Bad (Generic) | Good (Specific) |
|---|---|
| "Our unique approach" | "The [X] Method" |
| "Our proven system" | "The [X] Framework" |
| "Our special process" | "The [X] Protocol" |
| "What we do differently" | "[Name] Technique" |
Mechanism Formula:
"The [Descriptive Adjective] [Core Action] [Framework Type]"
Examples:
- "The Reverse Funnel Framework"
- "The 3-Layer Positioning Protocol"
- "The Rapid Validation Method"
Present 5 angle types. Generate variations for their situation.
Angle Types:
| Angle | When to Use | Template | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONTRARIAN | Audience believes wrong thing | "Everything you know about [X] is wrong" | "Everything you know about dieting is wrong—it's not about eating less" |
| TRANSFORMATION | Clear before/after exists | "From [painful state] to [desired state]" | "From scattered freelancer to $20k/month agency owner" |
| ENEMY | External blame resonates | "Stop letting [X] steal your [Y]" | "Stop letting algorithm changes steal your traffic" |
| SPEED | Time is the constraint | "[Outcome] in [time] without [sacrifice]" | "Launch in 7 days without hiring developers" |
| SPECIFICITY | Crowded market, need niche | "For [exact person] who wants [exact thing]" | "For B2B SaaS founders who want enterprise clients" |
Angle Selection Questions:
Generate 3 Variations:
For each angle type that fits, generate a specific version:
ANGLE 1 (Primary recommendation):
"[Complete angle statement]"
Type: [Angle Type]
Why: [Why this fits their situation]
ANGLE 2 (Alternative):
"[Complete angle statement]"
Type: [Angle Type]
Why: [Why this could work]
ANGLE 3 (Alternative):
"[Complete angle statement]"
Type: [Angle Type]
Why: [Why this could work]
Run each angle through the 3-point test:
The 3-Point Angle Test:
| Test | Question | Pass Criteria | Fail Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specific? | Can I visualize the result? | Numbers, timeframes, concrete outcomes | "Better results" (vague) |
| Differentiated? | Can a competitor say the same? | Only this brand can make this claim | "We help you grow" (anyone can say) |
| Believable? | Does mechanism/proof support it? | Evidence backs the claim | "10x your business overnight" (no proof) |
Scoring:
| Score | Rating | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 3/3 | Strong | Test this angle |
| 2/3 | Weak | Strengthen the failing point |
| 1/3 | Very Weak | Pick different angle |
| 0/3 | Don't Use | Complete rework needed |
Specificity Upgrade Examples:
| Before (Vague) | After (Specific) |
|---|---|
| "Better results" | "20 lbs in 6 weeks" |
| "More revenue" | "$50k MRR in 90 days" |
| "Save time" | "2 hours back every day" |
| "Grow your business" | "Add 10 enterprise clients this quarter" |
# Positioning Angle Analysis: [Product/Service]
## Market Stage Assessment
**Current Stage:** [NEW/GROWING/CROWDED/JADED/MATURE]
**Evidence:**
- [Sign 1]
- [Sign 2]
- [Sign 3]
**Recommended Promise Strategy:** [Strategy from matrix]
---
## Your Mechanism
**What You Do That Others Skip:**
> [Description of unique approach]
**Mechanism Name:** "The [X] [Method/Framework/Protocol]"
**Why This Works:**
> [Brief explanation]
---
## Angle Recommendations
### Primary Angle (Recommended)
**Statement:**
> "[Complete angle statement]"
**Type:** [Angle Type]
**Test Results:**
| Test | Result | Notes |
|------|--------|-------|
| Specific? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Differentiated? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Believable? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
**Score:** [X/3]
---
### Alternative Angle 1
**Statement:**
> "[Complete angle statement]"
**Type:** [Angle Type]
**Test Results:**
| Test | Result | Notes |
|------|--------|-------|
| Specific? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Differentiated? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Believable? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
**Score:** [X/3]
---
### Alternative Angle 2
**Statement:**
> "[Complete angle statement]"
**Type:** [Angle Type]
**Test Results:**
| Test | Result | Notes |
|------|--------|-------|
| Specific? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Differentiated? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
| Believable? | ✅/❌ | [Details] |
**Score:** [X/3]
---
## Testing Recommendation
**Angle to Test First:** [Primary recommendation]
**Why:** [Rationale]
**How to Test:**
1. [ ] Use in headline A/B test
2. [ ] Test in cold outreach subject lines
3. [ ] Try in social media hooks
4. [ ] Use in ad copy
**Success Metrics:**
- Click-through rate improvement
- Conversion rate improvement
- Response rate improvement
---
## Next Steps
1. [ ] Test primary angle in [specific context]
2. [ ] If underperforms, test alternative angles
3. [ ] Once validated, use in all messaging
4. [ ] Build offer around winning angle with `offer-architect`
❌ Before (Weak Angles):
| Product | Weak Angle | Problem |
|---|---|---|
| Marketing agency | "We help you grow" | Generic, anyone can say it |
| Fitness app | "Get fit faster" | Vague, not specific |
| SaaS tool | "Save time on [task]" | No differentiation |
| Course | "Learn [skill]" | No transformation shown |
✅ After (Strong Angles):
| Product | Strong Angle | Why It Works |
|---|---|---|
| Marketing agency | "For B2B SaaS founders who want enterprise clients in 90 days using the Account Penetration Method" | SPECIFICITY + SPEED + MECHANISM |
| Fitness app | "20 lbs in 6 weeks without giving up the foods you love, using the Metabolic Reset Protocol" | SPEED + MECHANISM + SPECIFIC |
| SaaS tool | "Stop letting manual data entry steal 2 hours of your day" | ENEMY + SPECIFIC |
| Course | "From complete beginner to first paid client in 30 days" | TRANSFORMATION + SPEED |
| Skill | When to Use Together |
|---|---|
offer-architect | After finding angle, build complete offer around it |
copywriter | Write headlines and copy using the angle |
expert-architect | Build authority positioning that supports the angle |
funnel-architect | Design funnel messaging using the angle |
channel-validator | Validate where to distribute the angle |
expert-architectexpert-validatoroffer-architectcopywriterexecution-acceleratormarket-sizerWeekly Installs
84
Repository
GitHub Stars
19
First Seen
Jan 20, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
opencode64
codex63
gemini-cli62
claude-code59
cursor57
github-copilot53
社交媒体内容策略指南:创建、优化与互动全流程 | 营销技能
40,400 周安装