domain-authority-auditor by aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills
npx skills add https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills --skill domain-authority-auditor基于 CITE 域名评级。完整基准参考:references/cite-domain-rating.md
SEO & GEO 技能库 · 20 个 SEO + GEO 技能 · 一键安装所有:
npx skills add aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
此技能依据 4 个维度下的 40 项标准化标准评估域名权威度。它生成一份全面的审计报告,包含逐项评分、按域名类型划分的维度和加权分数、否决项检查以及优先级行动方案。
姊妹技能:内容质量审计 在页面级别评估内容(80 项)。此技能评估内容背后的域名(40 项)。两者共同提供完整的 120 项评估。
命名空间说明:CITE 使用 C01-C10 表示引文项目;CORE-EEAT 使用 C01-C10 表示上下文清晰度项目。在组合的 120 项评估中,为避免混淆,请加上框架名称前缀(例如,CITE-C01 与 CORE-C01)。
Audit domain authority for [domain]
Run a CITE domain audit on [domain] as a [domain type]
CITE audit for example.com as an e-commerce site
Score this SaaS domain against the 40-item benchmark: [domain]
Compare domain authority: [your domain] vs [competitor 1] vs [competitor 2]
Run full 120-item assessment on [domain]: CITE domain audit + CORE-EEAT content audit on [sample pages]
工具类别占位符请参见 CONNECTORS.md。
当连接了 ~~链接数据库 + ~~SEO 工具 + ~~AI 监控 + ~~知识图谱 + ~~品牌监控时: 自动从 ~~链接数据库 获取外链概况和链接质量指标,从 ~~SEO 工具 获取域名权威度分数和关键词排名,从 ~~AI 监控 获取 AI 引文数据,从 ~~知识图谱 获取实体存在数据,从 ~~品牌监控 获取品牌提及数据。
仅使用手动数据时: 要求用户提供:
使用提供的数据进行完整的 40 项审计。在输出中注明哪些项目因缺少访问权限而无法完全评估(例如,AI 引文数据、知识图谱查询、WHOIS 历史记录)。
当用户请求域名权威度审计时:
### 审计设置
**域名**: [domain]
**域名类型**: [自动检测或用户指定]
**维度权重**: [来自下方的域名类型权重表]
#### 域名类型权重表
> 规范来源:`references/cite-domain-rating.md`。此内联副本为方便起见提供。
| 维度 | 默认 | 内容发布商 | 产品与服务 | 电子商务 | 社区与 UGC | 工具与实用程序 | 权威与机构 |
|-----|:-------:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|
| C | 35% | **40%** | 25% | 20% | 35% | 25% | **45%** |
| I | 20% | 15% | **30%** | 20% | 10% | **30%** | 20% |
| T | 25% | 20% | 25% | **35%** | 25% | 25% | 20% |
| E | 20% | 25% | 20% | 25% | **30%** | 20% | 15% |
#### 否决项检查(紧急制动)
| 否决项 | 状态 | 措施 |
|-----------|--------|--------|
| T03: 链接-流量一致性 | ✅ 通过 / ⚠️ 否决 | [如果否决:"审计外链概况;拒绝有毒链接"] |
| T05: 外链概况独特性 | ✅ 通过 / ⚠️ 否决 | [如果否决:"标记为操纵网络;调查链接来源"] |
| T09: 处罚与取消索引历史 | ✅ 通过 / ⚠️ 否决 | [如果否决:"首先处理处罚;其他所有优化都无效"] |
如果任何否决项触发,请在报告顶部显著标记。无论其他分数如何,CITE 分数上限为 39 分(差)。
根据 references/cite-domain-rating.md 中的标准评估每个项目。
为每个项目评分:
通过 = 10 分(完全符合标准)
部分通过 = 5 分(部分符合标准)
未通过 = 0 分(不符合标准)
| ID | 检查项 | 分数 | 备注 |
|---|---|---|---|
| C01 | 引用域名数量 | 通过/部分通过/未通过 | [具体观察] |
| C02 | 引用域名质量 | 通过/部分通过/未通过 | [具体观察] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| C10 | 链接来源多样性 | 通过/部分通过/未通过 | [具体观察] |
C 分数: [X]/100
| ID | 检查项 | 分数 | 备注 |
|---|---|---|---|
| I01 | 知识图谱存在 | 通过/部分通过/未通过 | [具体观察] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
I 分数: [X]/100
信任和声望维度采用相同格式。
### T — 信任
| ID | 检查项 | 分数 | 备注 |
|----|-----------|-------|-------|
| T01 | 链接概况自然度 | 通过/部分通过/未通过 | [具体观察] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
**T 分数**: [X]/100
### E — 声望
| ID | 检查项 | 分数 | 备注 |
|----|-----------|-------|-------|
| E01 | 自然搜索可见性 | 通过/部分通过/未通过 | [具体观察] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
**E 分数**: [X]/100
注意:某些项目需要专门数据(C05-C08 AI 引文数据、I01 知识图谱查询、T04-T05 IP/概况分析)。对可观察到的项目进行评分;将无法验证的项目标记为“N/A — 需要 [数据来源]”并从维度平均分中排除。
计算分数并生成最终报告:
## CITE 域名权威度报告
### 概述
- **域名**: [domain]
- **域名类型**: [type]
- **审计日期**: [date]
- **CITE 分数**: [score]/100 ([rating])
- **否决状态**: ✅ 无触发 / ⚠️ [item] 触发 — 分数上限为 39
### 维度分数
| 维度 | 分数 | 评级 | 权重 | 加权分 |
|-----------|-------|--------|--------|----------|
| C — 引文 | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |
| I — 身份 | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |
| T — 信任 | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |
| E — 声望 | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |
| **CITE 分数** | | | | **[X]/100** |
**分数计算**: CITE 分数 = C × [w_C] + I × [w_I] + T × [w_T] + E × [w_E]
**评级标准**: 90-100 优秀 | 75-89 良好 | 60-74 中等 | 40-59 低 | 0-39 差
### 逐项分数
| ID | 检查项 | 分数 | 备注 |
|----|-----------|-------|-------|
| C01 | 引用域名数量 | [通过/部分通过/未通过] | [观察] |
| C02 | 引用域名质量 | [通过/部分通过/未通过] | [观察] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| E10 | 行业声量份额 | [通过/部分通过/未通过] | [观察] |
### 前 5 项优先级改进
排序依据:权重 × 失分(影响最大者优先)
1. **[ID] [名称]** — [具体修改建议]
- 当前: [未通过/部分通过] | 潜在增益: [X] 加权分
- 措施: [具体步骤]
2. **[ID] [名称]** — [具体修改建议]
- 当前: [未通过/部分通过] | 潜在增益: [X] 加权分
- 措施: [具体步骤]
3–5. [相同格式]
### 行动方案
#### 快速见效 (< 1 周)
- [ ] [措施 1]
- [ ] [措施 2]
#### 中等投入 (1-4 周)
- [ ] [措施 3]
- [ ] [措施 4]
#### 战略投入 (1-3 个月)
- [ ] [措施 5]
- [ ] [措施 6]
### 与 CORE-EEAT 交叉参考
要进行完整评估,请将此 CITE 审计与 CORE-EEAT 内容审计配对:
| 评估 | 分数 | 评级 |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| CITE (域名) | [X]/100 | [rating] |
| CORE-EEAT (内容) | [在示例页面上运行内容质量审计] | — |
**诊断矩阵**:
- 高 CITE + 高 CORE-EEAT → 保持并扩展
- 高 CITE + 低 CORE-EEAT → 优先提升内容质量
- 低 CITE + 高 CORE-EEAT → 构建域名权威度
- 低 CITE + 低 CORE-EEAT → 从内容开始,然后是域名
### 建议后续步骤
- 对于域名权威度构建:专注于上述前 5 项优先级
- 对于内容改进:在关键页面上使用 [内容质量审计](../content-quality-auditor/)
- 对于外链策略:使用 [外链分析器](../../monitor/backlink-analyzer/) 进行详细链接分析
- 对于竞争对手基准对比:使用 [竞争对手分析](../../research/competitor-analysis/) 结合 CITE 分数
- 对于跟踪进度:使用 `/seo:report` 运行并查看 CITE 分数趋势
请参阅 references/example-report.md,查看 cloudhosting.com 的完整 CITE 审计,展示否决项检查、维度分数、前 5 项改进、行动方案以及与 CORE-EEAT 的交叉参考。
每周安装量
700
代码仓库
GitHub 星标
361
首次出现
2026 年 2 月 10 日
安全审计
安装于
opencode617
gemini-cli606
codex602
github-copilot586
amp566
kimi-cli565
Based on CITE Domain Rating. Full benchmark reference: references/cite-domain-rating.md
SEO& GEO Skills Library · 20 skills for SEO + GEO · Install all:
npx skills add aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills
Research · keyword-research · competitor-analysis · serp-analysis · content-gap-analysis
Build · seo-content-writer · geo-content-optimizer · meta-tags-optimizer · schema-markup-generator
Optimize · on-page-seo-auditor · technical-seo-checker · internal-linking-optimizer · content-refresher
Monitor · rank-tracker · backlink-analyzer · performance-reporter · alert-manager
Cross-cutting · content-quality-auditor · domain-authority-auditor · entity-optimizer · memory-management
This skill evaluates domain authority across 40 standardized criteria organized in 4 dimensions. It produces a comprehensive audit report with per-item scoring, dimension and weighted scores by domain type, veto item checks, and a prioritized action plan.
Sister skill : content-quality-auditor evaluates content at the page level (80 items). This skill evaluates the domain behind the content (40 items). Together they provide a complete 120-item assessment.
Namespace note : CITE uses C01-C10 for Citation items; CORE-EEAT uses C01-C10 for Contextual Clarity items. In combined 120-item assessments, prefix with the framework name (e.g., CITE-C01 vs CORE-C01) to avoid confusion.
Audit domain authority for [domain]
Run a CITE domain audit on [domain] as a [domain type]
CITE audit for example.com as an e-commerce site
Score this SaaS domain against the 40-item benchmark: [domain]
Compare domain authority: [your domain] vs [competitor 1] vs [competitor 2]
Run full 120-item assessment on [domain]: CITE domain audit + CORE-EEAT content audit on [sample pages]
See CONNECTORS.md for tool category placeholders.
With ~~link database + ~~SEO tool + ~~AI monitor + ~~knowledge graph + ~~brand monitor connected: Automatically pull backlink profiles and link quality metrics from ~~link database, domain authority scores and keyword rankings from ~~SEO tool, AI citation data from ~~AI monitor, entity presence from ~~knowledge graph, and brand mention data from ~~brand monitor.
With manual data only: Ask the user to provide:
Proceed with the full 40-item audit using provided data. Note in the output which items could not be fully evaluated due to missing access (e.g., AI citation data, knowledge graph queries, WHOIS history).
When a user requests a domain authority audit:
### Audit Setup
**Domain**: [domain]
**Domain Type**: [auto-detected or user-specified]
**Dimension Weights**: [from domain-type weight table below]
#### Domain-Type Weight Table
> Canonical source: `references/cite-domain-rating.md`. This inline copy is for convenience.
| Dim | Default | Content Publisher | Product & Service | E-commerce | Community & UGC | Tool & Utility | Authority & Institutional |
|-----|:-------:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|
| C | 35% | **40%** | 25% | 20% | 35% | 25% | **45%** |
| I | 20% | 15% | **30%** | 20% | 10% | **30%** | 20% |
| T | 25% | 20% | 25% | **35%** | 25% | 25% | 20% |
| E | 20% | 25% | 20% | 25% | **30%** | 20% | 15% |
#### Veto Check (Emergency Brake)
| Veto Item | Status | Action |
|-----------|--------|--------|
| T03: Link-Traffic Coherence | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: "Audit backlink profile; disavow toxic links"] |
| T05: Backlink Profile Uniqueness | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: "Flag as manipulation network; investigate link sources"] |
| T09: Penalty & Deindex History | ✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO | [If VETO: "Address penalty first; all other optimization is futile"] |
If any veto item triggers, flag it prominently at the top of the report. CITE Score is capped at 39 (Poor) regardless of other scores.
Evaluate each item against the criteria in references/cite-domain-rating.md.
Score each item:
Pass = 10 points (fully meets criteria)
Partial = 5 points (partially meets criteria)
Fail = 0 points (does not meet criteria)
| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| C01 | Referring Domains Volume | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |
| C02 | Referring Domains Quality | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| C10 | Link Source Diversity | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |
C Score: [X]/100
Same format for Trust and Eminence dimensions.
### T — Trust
| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |
|----|-----------|-------|-------|
| T01 | Link Profile Naturalness | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
**T Score**: [X]/100
### E — Eminence
| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |
|----|-----------|-------|-------|
| E01 | Organic Search Visibility | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
**E Score**: [X]/100
Note : Some items require specialized data (C05-C08 AI citation data, I01 knowledge graph queries, T04-T05 IP/profile analysis). Score what is observable; mark unverifiable items as "N/A — requires [data source]" and exclude from dimension average.
Calculate scores and generate the final report:
## CITE Domain Authority Report
### Overview
- **Domain**: [domain]
- **Domain Type**: [type]
- **Audit Date**: [date]
- **CITE Score**: [score]/100 ([rating])
- **Veto Status**: ✅ No triggers / ⚠️ [item] triggered — Score capped at 39
### Dimension Scores
| Dimension | Score | Rating | Weight | Weighted |
|-----------|-------|--------|--------|----------|
| C — Citation | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |
| I — Identity | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |
| T — Trust | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |
| E — Eminence | [X]/100 | [rating] | [X]% | [X] |
| **CITE Score** | | | | **[X]/100** |
**Score Calculation**: CITE Score = C × [w_C] + I × [w_I] + T × [w_T] + E × [w_E]
**Rating Scale**: 90-100 Excellent | 75-89 Good | 60-74 Medium | 40-59 Low | 0-39 Poor
### Per-Item Scores
| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |
|----|-----------|-------|-------|
| C01 | Referring Domains Volume | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |
| C02 | Referring Domains Quality | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| E10 | Industry Share of Voice | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [observation] |
### Top 5 Priority Improvements
Sorted by: weight × points lost (highest impact first)
1. **[ID] [Name]** — [specific modification suggestion]
- Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points
- Action: [concrete step]
2. **[ID] [Name]** — [specific modification suggestion]
- Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points
- Action: [concrete step]
3–5. [Same format]
### Action Plan
#### Quick Wins (< 1 week)
- [ ] [Action 1]
- [ ] [Action 2]
#### Medium Effort (1-4 weeks)
- [ ] [Action 3]
- [ ] [Action 4]
#### Strategic (1-3 months)
- [ ] [Action 5]
- [ ] [Action 6]
### Cross-Reference with CORE-EEAT
For a complete assessment, pair this CITE audit with a CORE-EEAT content audit:
| Assessment | Score | Rating |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| CITE (Domain) | [X]/100 | [rating] |
| CORE-EEAT (Content) | [Run content-quality-auditor on sample pages] | — |
**Diagnosis Matrix**:
- High CITE + High CORE-EEAT → Maintain and expand
- High CITE + Low CORE-EEAT → Prioritize content quality
- Low CITE + High CORE-EEAT → Build domain authority
- Low CITE + Low CORE-EEAT → Start with content, then domain
### Recommended Next Steps
- For domain authority building: focus on top 5 priorities above
- For content improvement: use [content-quality-auditor](../content-quality-auditor/) on key pages
- For backlink strategy: use [backlink-analyzer](../../monitor/backlink-analyzer/) for detailed link analysis
- For competitor benchmarking: use [competitor-analysis](../../research/competitor-analysis/) with CITE scores
- For tracking progress: run `/seo:report` with CITE score trends
See references/example-report.md for a complete CITE audit of cloudhosting.com showing veto check, dimension scores, top 5 improvements, action plan, and cross-reference with CORE-EEAT.
Weekly Installs
700
Repository
GitHub Stars
361
First Seen
Feb 10, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykWarn
Installed on
opencode617
gemini-cli606
codex602
github-copilot586
amp566
kimi-cli565
35,800 周安装
| ID | Check Item | Score | Notes |
|---|
| I01 | Knowledge Graph Presence | Pass/Partial/Fail | [specific observation] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
I Score: [X]/100