🇺🇸English

Testing Patterns

A pragmatic approach to testing that emphasises:

• Live testing over mocks
• Agent execution to preserve context
• YAML specs as documentation and tests
• Persistent results committed to git

Philosophy

This is not traditional TDD. Instead:

1. Test in production/staging with good logging
2. Use agents to run tests (keeps main context clean)
3. Define tests declaratively in YAML (human-readable, version-controlled)
4. Focus on integration (real servers, real data)

Why Agent-Based Testing?

Running 50 tests in the main conversation would consume your entire context window. By delegating to a sub-agent:

• Main context stays clean for development
• Agent can run many tests without context pressure
• Results come back as a summary
• Failed tests get detailed investigation

Commands

Quick workflow:

/create-tests        → Generates tests/specs/*.yaml + .claude/agents/test-runner.md
/run-tests           → Spawns agent, runs all tests, saves results
/run-tests api       → Run only specs matching "api"
/run-tests --failed  → Re-run only failed tests
/coverage            → Run tests with coverage, analyse gaps
/coverage --threshold 80  → Fail if below 80%

Getting Started in a New Project

This skill provides the pattern and format. Claude designs the actual tests based on your project context.

What happens when you ask "Create tests for this project":

1. Discovery - Claude examines the project:

   • What MCP servers are configured?
   • What APIs or tools exist?
   • What does the code do?

2. Test Design - Claude creates project-specific tests:

   • Test cases for the actual tools/endpoints
   • Expected values based on real behavior
   • Edge cases relevant to this domain

3. Structure - Using patterns from this skill:

   • YAML specs in tests/ directory
   • Optional testing agent in .claude/agents/
   • Results saved to tests/results/

Example:

You: "Create tests for this MCP server"

Claude: [Discovers this is a Google Calendar MCP]
        [Sees tools: calendar_events, calendar_create, calendar_delete]
        [Designs test cases:]

        tests/calendar-events.yaml:
        - list_upcoming_events (expect: array, count_gte 0)
        - search_by_keyword (expect: contains search term)
        - invalid_date_range (expect: error status)

        tests/calendar-mutations.yaml:
        - create_event (expect: success, returns event_id)
        - delete_nonexistent (expect: error, contains "not found")

The skill teaches Claude:

• How to structure YAML test specs
• What validation rules are available
• How to create testing agents
• When to use parallel execution

Your project provides:

• What to actually test
• Expected values and behaviors
• Domain-specific edge cases

YAML Test Spec Format

name: Feature Tests
description: What these tests validate

# Optional: defaults applied to all tests
defaults:
  tool: my_tool_name
  timeout: 5000

tests:
  - name: test_case_name
    description: Human-readable purpose
    tool: tool_name  # Override default if needed
    params:
      action: search
      query: "test input"
    expect:
      contains: "expected substring"
      not_contains: "should not appear"
      status: success

Validation Rules

See references/validation-rules.md for complete documentation.

Creating a Testing Agent

Testing agents inherit MCP tools from the session. Create an agent that:

1. Reads YAML test specs
2. Executes tool calls with params
3. Validates responses against expectations
4. Reports results

Agent Template

CRITICAL : Do NOT specify a tools field if you need MCP access. When you specify ANY tools, it becomes an allowlist and "*" is interpreted literally (not as a wildcard). Omit tools entirely to inherit ALL tools from the parent session.

---
name: my-tester
description: |
  Tests [domain] functionality. Reads YAML test specs and validates responses.
  Use when: testing after changes, running regression tests.
# tools field OMITTED - inherits ALL tools from parent (including MCP)
model: sonnet
---

# [Domain] Tester

## How It Works

1. Find test specs: `tests/*.yaml`
2. Parse and execute each test
3. Validate responses
4. Report pass/fail summary

## Test Spec Location

tests/
├── feature-a.yaml
├── feature-b.yaml
└── results/
    └── YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS.md

## Execution

For each test:
1. Call tool with params
2. Capture response
3. Apply validation rules
4. Record PASS/FAIL

## Reporting

Save results to `tests/results/YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS.md`

See templates/test-agent.md for complete template.

Results Format

Test results are saved as markdown for git history:

# Test Results: feature-name
**Date**: 2026-02-02 14:30
**Commit**: abc1234
**Summary**: 8/9 passed (89%)

## Results

- test_basic_search - PASSED (0.3s)
- test_with_filter - PASSED (0.4s)
- test_edge_case - FAILED

## Failed Test Details

### test_edge_case
- **Expected**: Contains "expected value"
- **Actual**: Response was empty
- **Params**: `{ action: search, query: "" }`

Save to: tests/results/YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS.md

Workflow

1. Create Test Specs

# tests/search.yaml
name: Search Tests
defaults:
  tool: my_search_tool

tests:
  - name: basic_search
    params: { query: "hello" }
    expect: { status: success, count_gte: 0 }

  - name: filtered_search
    params: { query: "hello", filter: "recent" }
    expect: { contains: "results" }

2. Create Testing Agent

Copy templates/test-agent.md and customise for your domain.

3. Run Tests

"Run the search tests"
"Test the API after my changes"
"Run regression tests for gmail-mcp"

4. Review Results

Results saved to tests/results/. Commit them for history:

git add tests/results/
git commit -m "Test results: 8/9 passed"

Parallel Test Execution

Run multiple test agents simultaneously to speed up large test suites:

"Run these test suites in parallel:
- Agent 1: tests/auth/*.yaml
- Agent 2: tests/search/*.yaml
- Agent 3: tests/api/*.yaml"

Each agent:

• Has its own context (won't bloat main conversation)
• Can run 10-50 tests independently
• Returns a summary when done
• Inherits MCP tools from parent session

Why parallel agents?

• 50 tests in main context = context exhaustion
• 50 tests across 5 agents = clean context + faster execution
• Each agent reports pass/fail summary, not every test detail

Batching strategy:

• Group tests by feature area or MCP server
• 10-20 tests per agent is ideal
• Too few = overhead of spawning not worth it
• Too many = agent context fills up

MCP Testing

For MCP servers, the testing agent inherits configured MCPs:

# Configure MCP first
claude mcp add --transport http gmail https://gmail.mcp.example.com/mcp

# Then test
"Run tests for gmail MCP"

Example MCP test spec:

name: Gmail Search Tests
defaults:
  tool: gmail_messages

tests:
  - name: search_from_person
    params: { action: search, searchQuery: "from John" }
    expect: { contains: "from:john" }

  - name: search_with_date
    params: { action: search, searchQuery: "emails from January 2026" }
    expect: { matches: "after:2026" }

API Testing

For REST APIs, use Bash tool:

name: API Tests
defaults:
  timeout: 5000

tests:
  - name: health_check
    command: curl -s https://api.example.com/health
    expect: { contains: "ok" }

  - name: get_user
    command: curl -s https://api.example.com/users/1
    expect:
      json_path: "$.name"
      type: string

Browser Testing

For browser automation, use Playwright tools:

name: UI Tests

tests:
  - name: login_page_loads
    steps:
      - navigate: https://app.example.com/login
      - snapshot: true
    expect: { contains: "Sign In" }

  - name: form_submission
    steps:
      - navigate: https://app.example.com/form
      - type: { ref: "#email", text: "test@example.com" }
      - click: { ref: "button[type=submit]" }
    expect: { contains: "Success" }

Tips

1. Start with smoke tests : Basic connectivity and auth
2. Test edge cases : Empty results, errors, special characters
3. Use descriptive names : search_with_date_filter not test1
4. Group related tests : One file per feature area
5. Add after bugs : Every fixed bug gets a regression test
6. Commit results : Create history of test runs

What This Is NOT

• Not a Jest/Vitest replacement (use those for unit tests)
• Not enforcing TDD (use what works for you)
• Not a test runner library (the agent IS the runner)
• Not about mocking (we test real systems)

When to Use

Related Resources

• templates/test-spec.yaml - Generic test spec template
• templates/test-agent.md - Testing agent template
• references/validation-rules.md - Complete validation rule reference

Weekly Installs

158

Repository

jezweb/claude-skills

GitHub Stars

650

First Seen

Feb 2, 2026

Security Audits

Gen Agent Trust HubFailSocketWarnSnykWarn

Installed on

claude-code128

opencode108

gemini-cli100

replit97

codex94

cursor87