yield-opportunities by kukapay/crypto-skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kukapay/crypto-skills --skill yield-opportunities本技能提供全面的工作流程,用于发现和分析跨多个协议、区块链和收益生成策略的 DeFi 收益机会。
在研究收益机会时,并行启动多个后台智能体:
websearch_web_search_exa - 用于查询当前年化收益率、平台比较
* grep_app_searchGitHub - 用于搜索开源收益追踪器
* webfetch - 用于获取特定文档页面需要查找的信息:
各链关键平台:
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
需要查找的信息:
顶级平台:
需要查找的信息:
池类型:
需要查找的信息:
顶级聚合器:
需要查找的信息:
决策框架:
| 平台 | 覆盖范围 | 每日更新 |
|---|---|---|
| DefiLlama | 14,149 个池,495 个协议,110 条链 | 是 |
| Vaults.fyi | 500+ 个保险库 | 是 |
| DexLender | 稳定币借贷利率 | 是 |
| CoinMarketCap Yield | 多资产,DeFi 与 CeFi | 是 |
始终参考官方文档:
Step 1: 并行启动 5-6 个资料员智能体:
- BNB 质押选项(委托、流动性质押)
- BSC 借贷协议(Venus, Alpaca)
- BNB 流动性挖矿(PancakeSwap, Biswap 池)
- BSC 收益聚合器(Beefy, Autofarm 保险库)
- BNB 桥接选项(如果值得探索)
Step 2: 运行并行网络搜索查询:
- BNB 质押当前年化收益率
- Venus 协议 BNB 供应利率
- PancakeSwap BNB 池年化百分比率
- Beefy BNB 保险库表现
Step 3: 收集并综合发现:
- 按风险承受能力组织(低/中/高)
- 包含当前利率、要求、风险
- 提供决策框架
Step 4: 输出结构化建议:
- 最安全选项(质押、单代币保险库)
- 中等风险(借贷、稳定币流动性提供)
- 高风险(波动性代币流动性提供、挖矿)
- 每个选项的风险评估
| 等级 | 示例 | 典型年化收益率范围 | 关键风险 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 低 | 原生质押、流动性质押、CeFi 保险库 | 3-8% | 链风险、价格波动 |
| 中 | 借贷、稳定币流动性提供、单代币保险库 | 5-28% | 智能合约风险、清算 |
| 高 | 代币流动性提供挖矿、收益聚合器 | 20-100%+ | 无常损失、协议风险 |
| 极高 | 新协议、高无常损失头寸 | 100%+ | 黑客攻击风险、跑路骗局 |
呈现收益机会时,请使用此格式:
1. 任务:[原子任务描述]
2. 预期成果:[包含成功标准的具体交付物]
3. 所需工具:[明确的工具白名单]
4. 必须做:
- [详尽的要求,不要隐含任何内容]
- [获取 2025 年的最新信息]
- [包含官方来源的 URL]
5. 禁止做:
- [不要提供具体的年化收益率数字 - 变化太快]
- [不要建议存在已知问题的协议]
- [不要忽略风险]
6. 上下文:[用户的情况和限制]
1. 任务:研究 [ASSET] 在 [CHAIN] 上的质押选项
2. 预期成果:完整的质押选项列表,包含验证节点信息、年化收益率范围、如何质押以及要求
3. 所需工具:websearch_web_search_exa, webfetch
4. 必须做:
- 研究原生链质押验证节点(官方文档)
- 查找当前验证节点年化收益率和委托流程
- 研究流动性质押协议
- 记录最低金额、锁定期、解绑时间
- 包含官方质押界面的 URL
5. 禁止做:
- 除非是顶级验证节点,否则不要推荐特定验证节点
- 不要忽略质押风险(削减惩罚、解绑)
- 不要猜测未来年化收益率变化
6. 上下文:用户拥有 [ASSET] 并希望获得安全的质押收益
使用特定模式,而非宽泛查询:
良好:
避免:
详见 references/ 下的详细指南:
每周安装次数
86
代码仓库
GitHub 星标数
15
首次出现
2026年2月3日
安全审计
安装于
opencode73
gemini-cli72
codex68
github-copilot66
cursor64
kimi-cli63
This skill provides comprehensive workflows for discovering and analyzing DeFi yield opportunities across multiple protocols, blockchains, and yield-generating strategies.
When researching yield opportunities, launch multiple background agents IN PARALLEL:
Librarian Agents (3-6 concurrent) - Best for external research:
Direct Tools - Use in parallel with librarian agents:
websearch_web_search_exa - For current APYs, platform comparisonsgrep_app_searchGitHub - For open-source yield trackerswebfetch - To fetch specific documentation pagesWhat to find:
Key Platforms by Chain:
What to find:
Top Platforms:
What to find:
Pool Types:
What to find:
Top Aggregators:
What to find:
Decision Framework:
| Platform | Coverage | Daily Updates |
|---|---|---|
| DefiLlama | 14,149 pools, 495 protocols, 110 chains | Yes |
| Vaults.fyi | 500+ vaults | Yes |
| DexLender | Stablecoin lending rates | Yes |
| CoinMarketCap Yield | Multi-asset, DeFi & CeFi | Yes |
Always reference official docs:
Step 1: Launch 5-6 librarian agents in parallel:
- BNB staking options (delegation, liquid staking)
- BSC lending protocols (Venus, Alpaca)
- BNB liquidity farming (PancakeSwap, Biswap pools)
- BSC yield aggregators (Beefy, Autofarm vaults)
- BNB bridging options (if worth exploring)
Step 2: Run parallel websearch queries:
- Current APYs for BNB staking
- Venus Protocol BNB supply rates
- PancakeSwap BNB pool APRs
- Beefy BNB vault performance
Step 3: Collect and synthesize findings:
- Organize by risk tolerance (Low/Medium/High)
- Include current rates, requirements, risks
- Provide decision framework
Step 4: Output structured recommendations:
- Safest options (staking, single-token vaults)
- Medium risk (lending, stablecoin LP)
- High risk (volatile LP, farming)
- Risk assessment for each option
| Level | Examples | Typical APY Range | Key Risks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Native staking, liquid staking, CeFi vaults | 3-8% | Chain risks, price volatility |
| Medium | Lending, stablecoin LP, single-token vaults | 5-28% | Smart contract risk, liquidation |
| High | Token LP farming, yield aggregators | 20-100%+ | Impermanent loss, protocol risk |
| Extreme | New protocols, high-IL positions | 100%+ | Hack risks, rug scams |
Impermanent Loss (IL)
Smart Contract Risk
Price Risk
Liquidation Risk
Bridge Risk (if bridging recommended)
When presenting yield opportunities, use this format:
1. TASK: [Atomic task description]
2. EXPECTED OUTCOME: [Concrete deliverables with success criteria]
3. REQUIRED TOOLS: [Explicit tool whitelist]
4. MUST DO:
- [Exhaustive requirements, leave nothing implicit]
- [Get current 2025 information]
- [Include URLs to official sources]
5. MUST NOT DO:
- [Don't provide specific APY numbers - change too fast]
- [Don't suggest protocols with known issues]
- [Don't ignore risks]
6. CONTEXT: [User's situation and constraints]
1. TASK: Research [ASSET] staking options on [CHAIN]
2. EXPECTED OUTCOME: Complete list of staking options with validator info, APY ranges, how to stake, and requirements
3. REQUIRED TOOLS: websearch_web_search_exa, webfetch
4. MUST DO:
- Research native chain staking validators (official docs)
- Find current validator APYs and delegation process
- Research liquid staking protocols
- Document minimum amounts, lock periods, unbonding times
- Include URLs to official staking interfaces
5. MUST NOT DO:
- Don't recommend specific validators unless top-tier
- Don't ignore staking risks (slashing, unbonding)
- Don't speculate on future APY changes
6. CONTEXT: User has [ASSET] and wants safe staking yield
Instead of broad queries, use specific patterns:
Good:
Avoid:
See references/ for detailed guides:
Weekly Installs
86
Repository
GitHub Stars
15
First Seen
Feb 3, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubFailSocketPassSnykWarn
Installed on
opencode73
gemini-cli72
codex68
github-copilot66
cursor64
kimi-cli63
CoinGecko API 集成 - 实时加密货币价格、市场数据与区块链分析工具
4,000 周安装