npx skills add https://github.com/4444j99/a-i--skills --skill evaluation-to-growth一个系统化框架,通过严格评估将内容转化为更强大、更具韧性的最终成果。
开始前,确定执行模式和输出格式。
交互模式 :逐步执行每个阶段,在阶段间暂停以等待用户输入和指导。最适合协作优化或学习该框架。
自主模式 :执行所有阶段并提供全面结果。最适合高效批量评估或用户希望预先获得完整分析的情况。
Markdown 报告 :结构化文档,包含每个阶段、发现和建议的章节。最适合文档记录或分享。
结构化清单 :带有状态指示器和行动项的分项发现。最适合跟踪和实施。
内联修订 :建议嵌入在原始内容内部或旁边。最适合直接编辑工作流。
[评估] → [强化] → [风险分析] → [成长]
从五个维度进行全面评估。
整体识别优缺点。
提示 :"全面评估此内容。识别其主要优势和弱点。突出哪些部分有效,哪些需要改进,并提供具体原因。"
输出结构 :
确保内部一致性和推理的合理性。
提示 :"检查内容的逻辑一致性。识别矛盾、推理漏洞或无依据的主张,并建议如何加强连贯性。"
输出结构 :
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
评估理性和事实吸引力。
提示 :"评估此内容的理性和事实吸引力。论点是否清晰、有充分支持且具有说服力?建议增强逻辑影响力的方法。"
输出结构 :
评估情感共鸣。
提示 :"分析此内容的情感基调和共鸣。它是否与目标受众建立了情感联系?建议调整方案以提高参与度。"
输出结构 :
检查可信度和权威性。
提示 :"评估此内容的可信度和权威性。它是否体现了专业知识和可信度?建议加强其可靠性和专业语气的方法。"
输出结构 :
基于评估发现进行整合和加强。
整合逻辑检查结果以消除矛盾并加强连贯性。
行动 :
在漏洞演变为失败之前识别它们。
揭示被忽视的领域或隐藏的假设。
提示 :"识别此内容中可能被忽视、存在偏见或基于隐藏假设的任何领域。提供解决这些差距或风险的建议。"
输出结构 :
精确定位关键漏洞。
提示 :"分析内容中可能导致失败或严重批评的潜在漏洞或弱点。建议预防措施或加固方案。"
输出结构 :
将评估转化为演进。
从分析中产生新的方向。
提示 :"根据已审查的内容,生成可以增强或扩展其影响力的创新想法、新方向或见解。"
输出结构 :
生成强化后的最终版本。
提示 :"整合所有反馈和改进,创建一份经过打磨、更强大、更具韧性的内容最终版本。"
输出结构 :
步骤 1:"我将使用评估到成长框架评估您的内容。
首先,我们来评估优势和弱点。[批判性分析结果]
在进入逻辑检查之前,您想讨论这些发现吗?"
步骤 2:[等待响应,然后进行逻辑检查]
步骤 3:[继续执行每个阶段,并设置暂停点]
步骤 4:"我们已经完成了评估阶段。准备好进入风险分析了吗?"
[继续执行所有阶段,并设置用户检查点]
"我将提供您内容的完整评估到成长分析。
## 评估阶段
[所有五个维度的发现]
## 强化
[综合与连贯性改进]
## 风险分析
[盲点和断裂点]
## 成长
[涌现的见解和演进版本]
## 总结
[关键发现和建议的后续步骤]"
参见 references/report-template.md
参见 references/checklist-template.md
参见 references/inline-template.md
| 阶段 | 目的 | 关键问题 |
|---|---|---|
| 批判性分析 | 整体评估 | 哪些有效?哪些无效? |
| 逻辑检查 | 内部一致性 | 是否自相矛盾? |
| 理性 | 理性吸引力 | 论点是否合理? |
| 情感 | 情感吸引力 | 是否产生连接? |
| 信誉 | 可信度 | 是否值得信赖? |
| 盲点 | 隐藏风险 | 我忽略了什么? |
| 断裂点 | 关键漏洞 | 哪里可能失败? |
| 绽放 | 涌现式成长 | 出现了哪些新的可能性? |
| 演进 | 最终优化 | 最强的版本是什么? |
references/report-template.md - 完整的 Markdown 报告格式references/checklist-template.md - 结构化清单格式references/inline-template.md - 内联修订格式每周安装次数
1
代码仓库
GitHub 星标数
2
首次出现
1 天前
安全审计
已安装于
zencoder1
amp1
cline1
openclaw1
opencode1
cursor1
A systematic framework for transforming content through rigorous evaluation into stronger, more resilient final products.
Before beginning, determine execution mode and output format.
Interactive Mode : Walk through each phase step-by-step, pausing for user input and direction between stages. Best for collaborative refinement or learning the framework.
Autonomous Mode : Execute all phases and deliver comprehensive results. Best for efficient batch evaluation or when user wants complete analysis upfront.
Markdown Report : Structured document with sections for each phase, findings, and recommendations. Best for documentation or sharing.
Structured Checklist : Itemized findings with status indicators and action items. Best for tracking and implementation.
Inline Revisions : Suggestions embedded within or alongside the original content. Best for direct editing workflow.
[Evaluation] → [Reinforcement] → [Risk Analysis] → [Growth]
Comprehensive assessment across five dimensions.
Identify strengths and weaknesses holistically.
Prompt : "Evaluate this content thoroughly. Identify its key strengths and weaknesses. Highlight which parts are effective and which need improvement, providing specific reasons."
Output structure :
Ensure internal consistency and sound reasoning.
Prompt : "Examine the content for logical consistency. Identify contradictions, gaps in reasoning, or unsupported claims, and suggest how to strengthen coherence."
Output structure :
Assess rational and factual appeal.
Prompt : "Assess the rational and factual appeal of this content. Are the arguments clear, well-supported, and persuasive? Suggest ways to enhance the logical impact."
Output structure :
Evaluate emotional resonance.
Prompt : "Analyze the emotional tone and resonance of this content. Does it create an emotional connection with its intended audience? Recommend adjustments to increase engagement."
Output structure :
Examine credibility and authority.
Prompt : "Evaluate the credibility and authority of this content. Does it reflect expertise and trustworthiness? Suggest ways to reinforce its reliability and professional tone."
Output structure :
Consolidate and strengthen based on evaluation findings.
Integrate logic check findings to eliminate contradictions and reinforce coherence.
Actions :
Identify vulnerabilities before they become failures.
Reveal overlooked areas or hidden assumptions.
Prompt : "Identify any areas in this content that may be overlooked, biased, or based on hidden assumptions. Provide suggestions to address these gaps or risks."
Output structure :
Pinpoint critical vulnerabilities.
Prompt : "Analyze the content for potential vulnerabilities or weak points that could cause failure or serious criticism. Recommend preventive measures or reinforcements."
Output structure :
Transform evaluation into evolution.
Generate new directions from the analysis.
Prompt : "From the reviewed content, generate innovative ideas, new directions, or insights that could enhance or expand its impact."
Output structure :
Produce the strengthened final version.
Prompt : "Incorporate all feedback and refinements to create a polished, stronger, and more resilient final version of the content."
Output structure :
Step 1: "I'll evaluate your content using the Evaluation-to-Growth framework.
First, let's assess strengths and weaknesses. [Critique results]
Would you like to discuss these findings before moving to logic check?"
Step 2: [Wait for response, then proceed to Logic Check]
Step 3: [Continue through each phase with pause points]
Step 4: "We've completed the evaluation phases. Ready to move into Risk Analysis?"
[Continue through all phases with user checkpoints]
"I'll provide a complete Evaluation-to-Growth analysis of your content.
## Evaluation Phase
[All five dimensions with findings]
## Reinforcement
[Synthesis and coherence improvements]
## Risk Analysis
[Blind spots and shatter points]
## Growth
[Emergent insights and evolved version]
## Summary
[Key findings and recommended next steps]"
See references/report-template.md
See references/checklist-template.md
See references/inline-template.md
| Phase | Purpose | Key Question |
|---|---|---|
| Critique | Holistic assessment | What works? What doesn't? |
| Logic Check | Internal consistency | Does it contradict itself? |
| Logos | Rational appeal | Is the argument sound? |
| Pathos | Emotional appeal | Does it connect? |
| Ethos | Credibility | Is it trustworthy? |
| Blind Spots | Hidden risks | What am I not seeing? |
| Shatter Points | Critical vulnerabilities | Where could this fail? |
| Bloom | Emergent growth | What new possibilities emerge? |
| Evolve | Final refinement | What's the strongest version? |
references/report-template.md - Full markdown report formatreferences/checklist-template.md - Structured checklist formatreferences/inline-template.md - Inline revision formatWeekly Installs
1
Repository
GitHub Stars
2
First Seen
1 day ago
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
zencoder1
amp1
cline1
openclaw1
opencode1
cursor1
冲刺回顾模板:敏捷团队回顾会议指南与模板(开始-停止-继续/愤怒-悲伤-高兴/4Ls)
10,400 周安装