marketing-strategy-pmm by davila7/claude-code-templates
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill marketing-strategy-pmm面向 A 轮及以上、采用混合 PLG/销售驱动模式进行国际扩张的初创公司的专家级产品营销手册。
product marketing, positioning, GTM, go-to-market strategy, competitive analysis, competitive intelligence, battlecards, ICP, ideal customer profile, messaging, value proposition, product launch, market entry, international expansion, sales enablement, win loss analysis, PMM, product marketing manager, market positioning, competitive landscape, sales training
此技能服务于:
产品营销经理:产品采用率、相对于竞争对手的胜率、销售速度、发布影响力指标、竞争胜率、交易规模增长
营销负责人:营销来源的管道金额、客户获取成本/客户终身价值比率、营销投资回报率(目标 3:1+)、品牌知名度提升、市场份额增长
增长负责人:激活率、周活跃用户/月活跃用户、漏斗各阶段转化率、回收期、病毒系数
首席营销官:收入增长百分比、管道覆盖率(3-4倍)、团队生产力、预算效率、净推荐值/品牌健康状况
HubSpot - 客户关系管理、交易跟踪、竞争失利分析、销售赋能内容 Google Analytics - 产品使用情况、激活漏斗、功能采用情况 Gong/Chorus - 销售通话分析、竞争情报、异议跟踪 Productboard - 功能请求、客户反馈、路线图优先级排序 Notion/Confluence - 内部维基、定位文档、竞争作战卡
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
现状分析:
Stage: Series A
Funding: $5-15M raised
Team Size: 20-50 people
Revenue: $1-5M ARR
Market Position: Challenger/Niche leader
Growth Rate Target: 3-5x YoY
Key Challenges:
- Prove product-market fit at scale
- Expand from early adopters → mainstream
- Enter new markets (EU/US/Canada)
- Compete against incumbents
- Build repeatable sales motion
战略优先级:
B2B SaaS 理想客户画像框架:
企业特征:
技术特征:
心理特征:
买家角色:
主要:经济决策者
次要:技术决策者
用户/倡导者
理想客户画像验证清单:
HubSpot 理想客户画像跟踪:
细分维度:
按公司规模:
按垂直领域:
按使用场景:
按地域:
细分优先级矩阵:
Segment: US Mid-Market SaaS Companies (200-2000 employees)
Priority: 1 (Highest)
Rationale:
- Largest TAM ($5B)
- Fastest sales cycle (60 days avg)
- Highest win rate (35%)
- Strong product fit (use cases align)
- Existing customer base (50% of customers)
Budget Allocation: 50% of marketing spend
第 1 步:列出你真正的竞争替代方案
不仅仅是直接竞争对手 - 如果您的产品不存在,客户会怎么做?
Alternatives:
1. Competitor A (direct)
2. Competitor B (direct)
3. Spreadsheets + email (status quo)
4. Build in-house (DIY)
5. Do nothing (ignore problem)
第 2 步:找出你的独特属性
你拥有哪些替代方案没有的东西?
Unique Attributes:
1. [Feature X that no one else has]
2. [Integration Y that's exclusive]
3. [Approach Z that's differentiated]
4. [Performance metric better than all]
第 3 步:将属性映射到价值
这些属性为客户提供了什么价值?
Attribute: [Real-time collaboration]
→ Value: Teams can work together simultaneously
→ Outcome: 50% faster project completion
Attribute: [AI-powered automation]
→ Value: Eliminates manual data entry
→ Outcome: Save 10 hours/week per user
第 4 步:定义你的最佳匹配客户
谁最关心这个价值?
Best-Fit: Mid-market SaaS companies (200-1000 employees)
Why: They have distributed teams, need real-time collaboration
Evidence: Fastest sales cycles, lowest churn, highest NPS
第 5 步:确定你的市场类别
你在哪个市场占据主导地位?
Options:
- Head-to-head: Compete in existing category (e.g., "CRM")
- Big fish, small pond: Own a niche (e.g., "CRM for agencies")
- Create new: Define new category (risky, expensive)
Decision: [Choose based on competitive strength and budget]
第 6 步:叠加趋势
哪些趋势使得现在是购买的合适时机?
Trends:
- Remote work explosion (2020-2025)
- AI/ML adoption in enterprise (2024-2025)
- Data privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA)
价值主张:
模板:[产品] 帮助 [目标客户] [实现目标] 通过 [独特方法]
示例:"Acme 通过人工智能自动化项目工作流,帮助中型市场 SaaS 团队交付速度提升 2 倍"
信息传递层次结构:
LEVEL 1: Value Proposition (one-liner)
[Your one-liner here]
LEVEL 2: Key Benefits (3-5 bullet points)
- Benefit 1: [Speed] → Ship products 2x faster
- Benefit 2: [Quality] → Reduce bugs by 50%
- Benefit 3: [Collaboration] → Align teams in real-time
- Benefit 4: [Cost] → Save $100k/year on tools
LEVEL 3: Features (supporting evidence)
- Feature → Benefit → Outcome
- AI automation → Eliminates manual work → Save 10 hrs/week
- Real-time sync → No version conflicts → 50% fewer errors
- Integrations → Connect existing tools → 80% faster onboarding
LEVEL 4: Proof Points
- Customer logos: [Microsoft, Shopify, Stripe]
- Stats: Used by 10,000+ teams, 4.8/5 G2 rating
- Case studies: How [Customer] achieved [Outcome]
按角色划分的信息传递:
经济决策者:
技术决策者:
最终用户:
信息测试框架:
迭代周期:
第 1 层:直接竞争对手
第 2 层:间接竞争对手
第 3 层:现状
竞争情报来源:
作战卡模板:
COMPETITOR: [Competitor A]
OVERVIEW:
- Founded: 2015
- Funding: Series C, $75M raised
- HQ: San Francisco
- Size: 200 employees
- Customers: 5,000+ companies
- Pricing: $50-$500/user/month
POSITIONING:
- They say: "All-in-one platform for modern teams"
- Reality: Broad but shallow, not deep in any use case
KEY STRENGTHS (What They Do Well):
1. Strong brand recognition (category leader)
2. Large feature set (breadth over depth)
3. Extensive integrations (2,000+ apps)
KEY WEAKNESSES (Where They Fall Short):
1. Complex UI (steep learning curve)
2. Expensive (2x our price at scale)
3. Poor support (low NPS in reviews)
4. Legacy architecture (slow performance)
OUR ADVANTAGES:
1. 10x easier to use (time-to-value in minutes vs. days)
2. 50% lower cost at 100+ users
3. Superior performance (2x faster load times)
4. White-glove onboarding (dedicated CSM)
WHEN TO WIN:
- Customer values ease of use over features
- Budget-conscious (not enterprise)
- Need fast time-to-value (<1 week)
- Poor experience with competitor (switching)
WHEN TO LOSE:
- Enterprise (>5000 employees) with complex requirements
- Need feature X that we don't have yet
- Deep integration with competitor's ecosystem
- Already invested heavily in competitor (sunk cost)
TALK TRACKS:
Objection: "We're already using [Competitor A]"
Response: "That's great - many of our customers came from [Competitor A]. What prompted you to explore alternatives? [Listen for pain points] Typically teams switch to us because [ease of use / cost / performance]. Would it be helpful to see a side-by-side comparison?"
Objection: "[Competitor A] has more features"
Response: "You're right - they've been around longer and have a broader feature set. Here's what we found: most teams only use 20% of those features. Our customers love that we focus on doing [core use case] exceptionally well rather than trying to do everything. What features are most critical for your team?"
PROOF POINTS:
- Case study: "[Customer] switched from [Competitor A], reduced costs by 60%"
- Review comparison: "[4.8 vs. 4.2 G2 rating in 'Ease of Use']"
- Win rate: "35% win rate in competitive deals"
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE:
[Link to competitive positioning map]
[Link to feature comparison matrix]
作战卡分发:
胜败访谈流程:
目标:
流程:
访谈问题:
针对获胜:
针对失败:
数据跟踪:
| 交易 | 结果 | 原因 | 竞争对手 | 价格因素 | 产品差距 | 信息传递问题 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acme Corp | 胜 | 最佳产品匹配度 | 竞争对手 A | 否 | 否 | 否 |
| Beta Inc | 败 | 价格 | 竞争对手 B | 是 | 否 | 否 |
| Gamma LLC | 败 | 缺少功能 X | 内部构建 | 否 | 是 | 否 |
月度洞察报告:
Win/Loss Summary (March 2025):
- Total deals analyzed: 20 (12 wins, 8 losses)
- Win rate: 60%
- Top win reasons:
1. Ease of use (8 mentions)
2. Better support (6 mentions)
3. Price (4 mentions)
- Top loss reasons:
1. Missing feature X (4 mentions)
2. Price (3 mentions)
3. Competitor relationship (2 mentions)
Action Items:
- Product: Prioritize feature X (lost 4 deals)
- Sales: Update battlecard for Competitor A (won 5 competitive deals)
- Marketing: Create case study on "ease of use" theme
产品驱动增长:
销售驱动增长:
混合模式:
A 轮建议:从混合模式开始
发布前:
第 1-4 周:基础
第 5-8 周:内容与赋能
第 9-12 周:渠道设置
发布期:
第 1 周:认知度
第 2-4 周:激活
发布后:
第 5-8 周:优化
第 9-12 周:扩展
市场进入优先级:
阶段 1:美国市场
阶段 2:英国市场
阶段 3:德语区市场
阶段 4:法国市场
阶段 5:加拿大市场
本地化清单:
预算分配:
Year 1 (Series A):
- US: 50% ($200k)
- UK: 20% ($80k)
- DACH: 15% ($60k)
- France: 10% ($40k)
- Canada: 5% ($20k)
Total: $400k marketing spend (international)
Expected ROI: 3:1 (marketing-sourced pipeline : spend)
第 1 层:重大发布
第 2 层:标准发布
第 3 层:次要发布
发布前 8 周:
第 -8 周:
第 -7 周:
第 -6 周:
第 -5 周:
发布前 4 周:
第 -4 周:
第 -3 周:
第 -2 周:
第 -1 周:
发布周:
第 1 天:
第 2-5 天:
第 2 周:
第 3-4 周:
先行指标:
滞后指标:
HubSpot 仪表板:
Launch Campaign: [Q2-2025-Product-X-Launch]
WEEK 1 RESULTS:
Traffic: 10,000 visitors (goal: 8,000) ✅
MQLs: 250 (goal: 200) ✅
SQLs: 40 (goal: 50) ⚠️
Pipeline: $800k (goal: $1M) ⚠️
Demos: 80 (goal: 100) ⚠️
TOP CHANNELS:
1. LinkedIn Ads: 120 MQLs, $150 CPL
2. Email: 80 MQLs, $25 CPL
3. Organic: 40 MQLs, $0 CPL
UNDERPERFORMING:
- Google Search: 10 MQLs, $400 CPL (pause and optimize)
- Webinar: 50 registrants, 20% show rate (improve email reminders)
NEXT ACTIONS:
- Increase LinkedIn Ads budget by 30%
- A/B test new landing page headline
- Sales follow-up blitz on 40 SQLs
核心资产:
1. 销售演示稿
Slide 1: Title slide (logo, tagline)
Slide 2: Agenda
Slide 3: Company intro (mission, vision, traction)
Slide 4: Problem statement (customer pain points)
Slide 5: Solution overview (your product)
Slide 6: Key benefits (3-5 bullets)
Slide 7: Product demo (screenshots or video)
Slide 8: Differentiation (vs. competitors)
Slide 9: Customer logos (social proof)
Slide 10: Case study (results-focused)
Slide 11: Pricing and plans
Slide 12: Implementation timeline
Slide 13: Support and success
Slide 14: Next steps (CTA)
Slide 15: Q&A
Guidelines:
- Visual-first (minimal text, large images)
- Customer-centric (benefits > features)
- Modular (easy to skip/reorder slides)
- Updated quarterly (or after major product changes)
2. 单页文档
3. 作战卡
4. 演示脚本
Demo Flow:
1. Intro (2 min) - Who we are, what we'll cover
2. Discovery (5 min) - Ask about their needs, pain points
3. Demo (20 min) - Show product (focus on their use case)
4. Q&A (10 min) - Address objections, questions
5. Next steps (3 min) - Define trial or POC plan
Demo Tips:
- Show, don't tell (product in action > slides)
- Use customer data (not "Company XYZ" examples)
- Focus on outcomes (not features)
- Address objections proactively (price, competition)
- Always drive to next step (trial, POC, proposal)
5. 邮件模板
6. 投资回报率计算器
月度销售赋能电话会议:
季度销售培训:
销售入职培训:
营销合格线索 → 销售合格线索交接:
产品营销 → 销售:
每周同步:
季度业务回顾:
沟通渠道:
产品采用:
销售速度:
胜率:
交易规模:
发布影响力:
竞争胜率:
自定义报告:
1. 产品发布影响力
Metrics: Leads, MQLs, SQLs, Pipeline $, Closed Won $
Dimensions: Campaign, Channel, Region
Filters: Campaign = "Q2-2025-Product-X-Launch"
Time period: 90 days post-launch
2. 竞争胜率
Metrics: Opportunities, Closed Won, Win Rate %
Dimensions: Competitor (property)
Filters: Deal stage = Closed Won or Closed Lost
Segment by: Competitor A, B, C, Other
3. 销售赋能使用情况
Metrics: Asset downloads, views, shares
Dimensions: Asset type (deck, battlecard, case study)
Filters: User = Sales team
Insight: Which assets are most used by sales
季度业务回顾模板:
幻灯片 1:执行摘要
Q2 2025 Highlights:
- Launched Product X (pipeline: $2M, 500 MQLs)
- Entered UK market (20 new customers, $400k ARR)
- Improved win rate by 15% (competitive positioning)
- Published 3 case studies (2x sales usage vs. Q1)
幻灯片 2:指标仪表板
KPI Q2 Target Q2 Actual Status
─────────────────────────────────────────────
MQLs 800 950 ✅ +19%
SQLs 150 140 ⚠️ -7%
Pipeline $ $4M $3.8M ⚠️ -5%
Win Rate 30% 35% ✅ +17%
Deal Size $45k $52k ✅ +16%
Sales Velocity 75 days 68 days ✅ -9%
幻灯片 3:关键洞察
What Worked:
1. Product X launch exceeded MQL target by 19%
2. Improved competitive positioning → 35% win rate
3. UK market entry on track ($400k ARR in 3 months)
What Didn't Work:
1. SQL conversion rate dropped from 20% to 15%
2. Google Ads underperformed (paused and optimizing)
3. Competitor
Expert Product Marketing playbook for Series A+ startups expanding internationally with hybrid PLG/Sales-Led motion.
product marketing, positioning, GTM, go-to-market strategy, competitive analysis, competitive intelligence, battlecards, ICP, ideal customer profile, messaging, value proposition, product launch, market entry, international expansion, sales enablement, win loss analysis, PMM, product marketing manager, market positioning, competitive landscape, sales training
This skill serves:
PMM : Product adoption rate, win rate vs. competitors, sales velocity, launch impact metrics, competitive win rate, deal size growth
Head of Marketing : Marketing-sourced pipeline $, CAC/LTV ratio, ROMI (3:1+ target), brand awareness lift, market share growth
Head of Growth : Activation rate, WAU/MAU, conversion rates across funnel, payback period, viral coefficient (PLG)
CMO : Revenue growth %, pipeline coverage (3-4x), team productivity, budget efficiency, NPS/brand health
HubSpot - CRM, deal tracking, competitive loss analysis, sales enablement content Google Analytics - Product usage, activation funnels, feature adoption Gong/Chorus - Sales call analysis, competitive intelligence, objection tracking Productboard - Feature requests, customer feedback, roadmap prioritization Notion/Confluence - Internal wiki, positioning docs, competitive battlecards
Current State Analysis :
Stage: Series A
Funding: $5-15M raised
Team Size: 20-50 people
Revenue: $1-5M ARR
Market Position: Challenger/Niche leader
Growth Rate Target: 3-5x YoY
Key Challenges:
- Prove product-market fit at scale
- Expand from early adopters → mainstream
- Enter new markets (EU/US/Canada)
- Compete against incumbents
- Build repeatable sales motion
Strategic Priorities (in order):
B2B SaaS ICP Framework :
Firmographics :
Technographics :
Psychographics :
Buyer Personas (3-5 personas max):
Primary: Economic Buyer (signs contract)
Secondary: Technical Buyer (evaluates product)
User/Champion (advocates internally)
ICP Validation Checklist :
HubSpot ICP Tracking :
Segmentation Dimensions :
By Company Size (recommend starting with one):
By Vertical (choose 2-3 focus verticals):
By Use Case (messaging varies):
By Geography (Series A focus):
Segmentation Priority Matrix :
Segment: US Mid-Market SaaS Companies (200-2000 employees)
Priority: 1 (Highest)
Rationale:
- Largest TAM ($5B)
- Fastest sales cycle (60 days avg)
- Highest win rate (35%)
- Strong product fit (use cases align)
- Existing customer base (50% of customers)
Budget Allocation: 50% of marketing spend
Step 1: List Your True Competitive Alternatives
Not just direct competitors - what would customers do if your product didn't exist?
Alternatives:
1. Competitor A (direct)
2. Competitor B (direct)
3. Spreadsheets + email (status quo)
4. Build in-house (DIY)
5. Do nothing (ignore problem)
Step 2: Isolate Your Unique Attributes
What do you have that alternatives don't?
Unique Attributes:
1. [Feature X that no one else has]
2. [Integration Y that's exclusive]
3. [Approach Z that's differentiated]
4. [Performance metric better than all]
Step 3: Map Attributes to Value
What value do these attributes provide to customers?
Attribute: [Real-time collaboration]
→ Value: Teams can work together simultaneously
→ Outcome: 50% faster project completion
Attribute: [AI-powered automation]
→ Value: Eliminates manual data entry
→ Outcome: Save 10 hours/week per user
Step 4: Define Your Best-Fit Customers
Who cares most about this value?
Best-Fit: Mid-market SaaS companies (200-1000 employees)
Why: They have distributed teams, need real-time collaboration
Evidence: Fastest sales cycles, lowest churn, highest NPS
Step 5: Nail Your Market Category
What market do you dominate?
Options:
- Head-to-head: Compete in existing category (e.g., "CRM")
- Big fish, small pond: Own a niche (e.g., "CRM for agencies")
- Create new: Define new category (risky, expensive)
Decision: [Choose based on competitive strength and budget]
Step 6: Layer on Trends
What trends make this the right time to buy?
Trends:
- Remote work explosion (2020-2025)
- AI/ML adoption in enterprise (2024-2025)
- Data privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA)
Value Proposition (One-Liner) :
Template: [Product] helps [Target Customer] [Achieve Goal] by [Unique Approach]
Example: "Acme helps mid-market SaaS teams ship 2x faster by automating project workflows with AI"
Messaging Hierarchy :
LEVEL 1: Value Proposition (one-liner)
[Your one-liner here]
LEVEL 2: Key Benefits (3-5 bullet points)
- Benefit 1: [Speed] → Ship products 2x faster
- Benefit 2: [Quality] → Reduce bugs by 50%
- Benefit 3: [Collaboration] → Align teams in real-time
- Benefit 4: [Cost] → Save $100k/year on tools
LEVEL 3: Features (supporting evidence)
- Feature → Benefit → Outcome
- AI automation → Eliminates manual work → Save 10 hrs/week
- Real-time sync → No version conflicts → 50% fewer errors
- Integrations → Connect existing tools → 80% faster onboarding
LEVEL 4: Proof Points
- Customer logos: [Microsoft, Shopify, Stripe]
- Stats: Used by 10,000+ teams, 4.8/5 G2 rating
- Case studies: How [Customer] achieved [Outcome]
Messaging by Persona :
Economic Buyer (VP/Director):
Technical Buyer (Engineer/Architect):
End User (Manager/Individual Contributor):
Message Testing Framework :
Qualitative (customer interviews):
Quantitative (A/B testing):
Sales Feedback (win/loss analysis):
Iteration Cycle :
Tier 1: Direct Competitors (head-to-head, same category)
Tier 2: Indirect Competitors (adjacent solutions)
Tier 3: Status Quo (what customers do today)
Competitive Intelligence Sources :
Battlecard Template (create one per competitor):
COMPETITOR: [Competitor A]
OVERVIEW:
- Founded: 2015
- Funding: Series C, $75M raised
- HQ: San Francisco
- Size: 200 employees
- Customers: 5,000+ companies
- Pricing: $50-$500/user/month
POSITIONING:
- They say: "All-in-one platform for modern teams"
- Reality: Broad but shallow, not deep in any use case
KEY STRENGTHS (What They Do Well):
1. Strong brand recognition (category leader)
2. Large feature set (breadth over depth)
3. Extensive integrations (2,000+ apps)
KEY WEAKNESSES (Where They Fall Short):
1. Complex UI (steep learning curve)
2. Expensive (2x our price at scale)
3. Poor support (low NPS in reviews)
4. Legacy architecture (slow performance)
OUR ADVANTAGES:
1. 10x easier to use (time-to-value in minutes vs. days)
2. 50% lower cost at 100+ users
3. Superior performance (2x faster load times)
4. White-glove onboarding (dedicated CSM)
WHEN TO WIN:
- Customer values ease of use over features
- Budget-conscious (not enterprise)
- Need fast time-to-value (<1 week)
- Poor experience with competitor (switching)
WHEN TO LOSE:
- Enterprise (>5000 employees) with complex requirements
- Need feature X that we don't have yet
- Deep integration with competitor's ecosystem
- Already invested heavily in competitor (sunk cost)
TALK TRACKS:
Objection: "We're already using [Competitor A]"
Response: "That's great - many of our customers came from [Competitor A]. What prompted you to explore alternatives? [Listen for pain points] Typically teams switch to us because [ease of use / cost / performance]. Would it be helpful to see a side-by-side comparison?"
Objection: "[Competitor A] has more features"
Response: "You're right - they've been around longer and have a broader feature set. Here's what we found: most teams only use 20% of those features. Our customers love that we focus on doing [core use case] exceptionally well rather than trying to do everything. What features are most critical for your team?"
PROOF POINTS:
- Case study: "[Customer] switched from [Competitor A], reduced costs by 60%"
- Review comparison: "[4.8 vs. 4.2 G2 rating in 'Ease of Use']"
- Win rate: "35% win rate in competitive deals"
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE:
[Link to competitive positioning map]
[Link to feature comparison matrix]
Battlecard Distribution :
Win/Loss Interview Process :
Goals :
Process :
Interview Questions (pick 8-10):
For Wins :
For Losses :
Data Tracking (in HubSpot or spreadsheet):
| Deal | Outcome | Reason | Competitor | Price Factor | Product Gap | Messaging Issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acme Corp | Won | Best product fit | Competitor A | No | No | No |
| Beta Inc | Lost | Price | Competitor B | Yes | No | No |
| Gamma LLC | Lost | Missing feature X | Built in-house | No | Yes | No |
Monthly Insights Report :
Win/Loss Summary (March 2025):
- Total deals analyzed: 20 (12 wins, 8 losses)
- Win rate: 60%
- Top win reasons:
1. Ease of use (8 mentions)
2. Better support (6 mentions)
3. Price (4 mentions)
- Top loss reasons:
1. Missing feature X (4 mentions)
2. Price (3 mentions)
3. Competitor relationship (2 mentions)
Action Items:
- Product: Prioritize feature X (lost 4 deals)
- Sales: Update battlecard for Competitor A (won 5 competitive deals)
- Marketing: Create case study on "ease of use" theme
PLG (Product-Led Growth) :
Sales-Led Growth :
Hybrid (PLG + Sales) :
Series A Recommendation : Start with Hybrid
Pre-Launch (Days -90 to -30) :
Week 1-4: Foundation
Week 5-8: Content & Enablement
Week 9-12: Channel Setup
Launch (Days 1-30) :
Week 1: Awareness
Week 2-4: Activation
Post-Launch (Days 31-90) :
Week 5-8: Optimization
Week 9-12: Scale
Market Entry Priority (Series A recommended order):
Phase 1: US Market (Months 1-6)
Phase 2: UK Market (Months 4-9)
Phase 3: DACH (Germany/Austria/Switzerland) (Months 7-12)
Phase 4: France (Months 10-15)
Phase 5: Canada (Months 7-12)
Localization Checklist (per market) :
Budget Allocation (international expansion):
Year 1 (Series A):
- US: 50% ($200k)
- UK: 20% ($80k)
- DACH: 15% ($60k)
- France: 10% ($40k)
- Canada: 5% ($20k)
Total: $400k marketing spend (international)
Expected ROI: 3:1 (marketing-sourced pipeline : spend)
Tier 1: Major Launch (quarterly, high impact)
Tier 2: Standard Launch (monthly, medium impact)
Tier 3: Minor Launch (weekly, low impact)
8 Weeks Before Launch :
Week -8:
Week -7:
Week -6:
Week -5:
4 Weeks Before Launch :
Week -4:
Week -3:
Week -2:
Week -1:
Launch Week :
Day 1 (Launch Day):
Days 2-5:
Week 2:
Week 3-4:
Leading Indicators (track daily):
Lagging Indicators (track weekly/monthly):
HubSpot Dashboard :
Launch Campaign: [Q2-2025-Product-X-Launch]
WEEK 1 RESULTS:
Traffic: 10,000 visitors (goal: 8,000) ✅
MQLs: 250 (goal: 200) ✅
SQLs: 40 (goal: 50) ⚠️
Pipeline: $800k (goal: $1M) ⚠️
Demos: 80 (goal: 100) ⚠️
TOP CHANNELS:
1. LinkedIn Ads: 120 MQLs, $150 CPL
2. Email: 80 MQLs, $25 CPL
3. Organic: 40 MQLs, $0 CPL
UNDERPERFORMING:
- Google Search: 10 MQLs, $400 CPL (pause and optimize)
- Webinar: 50 registrants, 20% show rate (improve email reminders)
NEXT ACTIONS:
- Increase LinkedIn Ads budget by 30%
- A/B test new landing page headline
- Sales follow-up blitz on 40 SQLs
Core Assets :
1. Sales Deck (15-20 slides)
Slide 1: Title slide (logo, tagline)
Slide 2: Agenda
Slide 3: Company intro (mission, vision, traction)
Slide 4: Problem statement (customer pain points)
Slide 5: Solution overview (your product)
Slide 6: Key benefits (3-5 bullets)
Slide 7: Product demo (screenshots or video)
Slide 8: Differentiation (vs. competitors)
Slide 9: Customer logos (social proof)
Slide 10: Case study (results-focused)
Slide 11: Pricing and plans
Slide 12: Implementation timeline
Slide 13: Support and success
Slide 14: Next steps (CTA)
Slide 15: Q&A
Guidelines:
- Visual-first (minimal text, large images)
- Customer-centric (benefits > features)
- Modular (easy to skip/reorder slides)
- Updated quarterly (or after major product changes)
2. One-Pagers (1-page PDF)
3. Battlecards (per competitor)
4. Demo Script (30-45 min)
Demo Flow:
1. Intro (2 min) - Who we are, what we'll cover
2. Discovery (5 min) - Ask about their needs, pain points
3. Demo (20 min) - Show product (focus on their use case)
4. Q&A (10 min) - Address objections, questions
5. Next steps (3 min) - Define trial or POC plan
Demo Tips:
- Show, don't tell (product in action > slides)
- Use customer data (not "Company XYZ" examples)
- Focus on outcomes (not features)
- Address objections proactively (price, competition)
- Always drive to next step (trial, POC, proposal)
5. Email Templates (HubSpot sequences)
6. ROI Calculator (spreadsheet or web tool)
Monthly Sales Enablement Call (60 min):
Quarterly Sales Training (half-day workshop):
Sales Onboarding (new hires):
MQL → SQL Handoff (see marketing-demand-acquisition skill for details)
Product Marketing → Sales :
Weekly Sync (30 min):
Quarterly Business Review (QBR):
Communication Channels :
Product Adoption :
Sales Velocity :
Win Rate :
Deal Size :
Launch Impact :
Competitive Win Rate :
Custom Reports :
1. Product Launch Impact
Metrics: Leads, MQLs, SQLs, Pipeline $, Closed Won $
Dimensions: Campaign, Channel, Region
Filters: Campaign = "Q2-2025-Product-X-Launch"
Time period: 90 days post-launch
2. Competitive Win Rate
Metrics: Opportunities, Closed Won, Win Rate %
Dimensions: Competitor (property)
Filters: Deal stage = Closed Won or Closed Lost
Segment by: Competitor A, B, C, Other
3. Sales Enablement Usage
Metrics: Asset downloads, views, shares
Dimensions: Asset type (deck, battlecard, case study)
Filters: User = Sales team
Insight: Which assets are most used by sales
QBR Template (present to executive team):
Slide 1: Executive Summary
Q2 2025 Highlights:
- Launched Product X (pipeline: $2M, 500 MQLs)
- Entered UK market (20 new customers, $400k ARR)
- Improved win rate by 15% (competitive positioning)
- Published 3 case studies (2x sales usage vs. Q1)
Slide 2: Metrics Dashboard
KPI Q2 Target Q2 Actual Status
─────────────────────────────────────────────
MQLs 800 950 ✅ +19%
SQLs 150 140 ⚠️ -7%
Pipeline $ $4M $3.8M ⚠️ -5%
Win Rate 30% 35% ✅ +17%
Deal Size $45k $52k ✅ +16%
Sales Velocity 75 days 68 days ✅ -9%
Slide 3: Key Insights
What Worked:
1. Product X launch exceeded MQL target by 19%
2. Improved competitive positioning → 35% win rate
3. UK market entry on track ($400k ARR in 3 months)
What Didn't Work:
1. SQL conversion rate dropped from 20% to 15%
2. Google Ads underperformed (paused and optimizing)
3. Competitor A launched aggressive pricing (5 lost deals)
Action Items:
1. Improve SQL qualification criteria (work with sales)
2. Update battlecard for Competitor A (new pricing)
3. Double down on UK market (hire local AE)
Slide 4: Next Quarter Plan
Q3 2025 Priorities:
1. Launch Product Y (pipeline target: $3M)
2. Enter DACH market (Germany, Austria, Switzerland)
3. Refresh messaging and website (new positioning)
4. Scale partnerships (3 new strategic partners)
5. Build customer advocacy program (10 case studies)
Budget: $150k (up from $120k in Q2)
Headcount: +1 PMM, +1 Content Marketer
Week 1 (Strategy & Planning):
Week 2 (Content & Enablement):
Week 3 (Launches & Campaigns):
Week 4 (Reporting & Iteration):
Week 1 : Research
Week 2 : Framework
Week 3 : Messaging
Week 4 : Validation
Week 5-6 : Rollout
PMM → Demand Gen :
PMM → Sales :
PMM → Product :
PMM → Customer Success :
Last Updated : October 2025 | Version : 1.0
Weekly Installs
555
Repository
GitHub Stars
23.4K
First Seen
Jan 21, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykWarn
Installed on
opencode473
gemini-cli465
codex439
github-copilot419
cursor417
claude-code411
程序化SEO实战指南:大规模创建优质页面,避免内容单薄惩罚
32,600 周安装
OpenAPI 转 TypeScript 工具 - 自动生成 API 接口与类型守卫
563 周安装
数据库模式设计器 - 内置最佳实践,自动生成生产级SQL/NoSQL数据库架构
564 周安装
Rust Unsafe代码检查器 - 安全使用Unsafe Rust的完整指南与最佳实践
564 周安装
.NET并发编程模式指南:async/await、Channels、Akka.NET选择决策树
565 周安装
韩语语法检查器 - 基于国立国语院标准的拼写、空格、语法、标点错误检测与纠正
565 周安装
技能安全扫描器 - 检测Claude技能安全漏洞,防范提示注入与恶意代码
565 周安装