重要前提
安装AI Skills的关键前提是:必须科学上网,且开启TUN模式,这一点至关重要,直接决定安装能否顺利完成,在此郑重提醒三遍:科学上网,科学上网,科学上网。查看完整安装教程 →
gtm-pricing by scientiacapital/skills
npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill gtm-pricing<quick_start> ICP 评分: 80+ = 理想 | 60-79 = 良好 | 40-59 = 一般 | <40 = 通过
定位陈述:
对于 [目标客户] 而言,他们 [需求],[产品名称] 是一个 [市场类别],能够 [带来利益]。
与 [替代方案] 不同,我们的产品 [差异化优势]。
基于价值的定价: 价格定为所交付量化价值的 10-20%
机会评分: 市场契合度、技术契合度、GTM 契合度、个人契合度、经济性 综合评分 /100 </quick_start>
<success_criteria> GTM 策略成功的标准:
<core_content> B2B 市场进入策略、定价和机会评估的综合指南。
| 框架 | 目的 | 使用时机 |
|---|---|---|
| ICP 开发 | 定义理想客户 | 任何对外接触之前 |
| 定位 | 在市场中进行差异化 | 产品发布、战略调整 |
| 信息层级 |
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
| 保持沟通一致性 |
| 销售赋能 |
| 竞争情报 | 了解市场格局 | 交易策略、定位 |
| 基于价值的定价 | 根据交付价值定价 | 设定初始价格 |
| 层级结构 | 打包产品/服务 | 功能限制决策 |
| 机会评分 | 评估契合度 | 新客户/项目决策 |
从三个维度构建你的 ICP,然后为每个潜在客户评分:
维度 1 -- 企业特征(他们是谁):
维度 2 -- 技术特征(他们使用什么):
维度 3 -- 心理特征(他们如何购买):
ICP 评分标准:
| 评分 | 标签 | 行动 |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | 理想 | 优先处理 -- 全面跟进节奏,寻求高管支持 |
| 60-79 | 良好 | 积极争取 -- 标准跟进节奏,彻底评估资格 |
| 40-59 | 一般 | 有条件处理 -- 仅在特定信号变化时(预算、时机) |
| <40 | 通过 | 拒绝 -- 机会成本过高 |
需要关注的行为信号:
ICP 验证清单:
完整的 YAML ICP 工作表模板和 ICP 示例(MEP 承包商)请参见 reference/gtm.md。
定位的 5 个组成部分:
定位陈述模板:
对于 [目标客户细分] 而言,他们 [关键需求/痛点],
[产品名称] 是一个 [市场类别],
能够 [主要价值主张]。
与 [竞争替代方案] 不同,
我们的产品 [与独特属性相关的关键差异化优势]。
信息层级(3 个层级,每个层级最多 3 个差异化点):
| 层级 | 受众 | 信息类型 |
|---|---|---|
| 战略层 | 高管层、董事会 | 业务成果、投资回报率、风险降低 |
| 解决方案层 | 总监、副总裁 | 能力、集成、工作流程改进 |
| 用户画像层 | 最终用户、管理员 | 功能、用户体验、日常工作流程收益 |
竞争对比卡要点: 为每个前 3 名竞争对手记录:
竞争对比卡模板、定位示例和竞争定位框架请参见 reference/gtm.md。
GTM 运作模式选择:
| 模式 | 年均合同价值 | 销售周期 | 所需团队 | 客户获取成本 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产品驱动增长 | <$5K | 数天 | 增长/产品团队 | 低 |
| 销售辅助 | $5-50K | 数周 | SDR + AE | 中等 |
| 企业级 | $50K+ | 数月 | AE + SE + CSM | 高 |
| 合作伙伴/渠道 | 可变 | 可变 | 合作伙伴经理 | 可变 |
渠道组合: 60-70% 主要模式,20-30% 次要模式,10% 实验性模式。
发布清单里程碑:
完整的发布清单、渠道策略详情和复杂度与资源匹配请参见 reference/gtm.md。
步骤 1 -- 量化客户价值:
总价值 = 时间节省 + 收入影响 + 成本避免
时间节省: 每月节省的小时数 x 每小时费率 x 12
收入影响: 每年带来的额外收入
成本避免: 每年消除或减少的成本
步骤 2 -- 将价格设定为量化价值的 10-20%:
步骤 3 -- 根据支付意愿进行验证:
| 模型 | 最适合 | 优点 | 缺点 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 统一费率 | 简单产品 | 易于理解 | 不随价值扩展 |
| 按席位 | 团队工具 | 可预测,随组织规模扩展 | 阻碍采用 |
| 按使用量 | API、基础设施 | 成本与价值一致 | 收入不可预测 |
| 分层(好/更好/最好) | 功能差异化 | 锚定效应,清晰的升级路径 | 设计复杂 |
| 混合(席位 + 使用量) | 企业级 SaaS | 可预测的基础 + 上升空间 | 计费复杂 |
层级结构原则:
功能限制规则:
| 限制依据 | 示例 | 使用时机 |
|---|---|---|
| 规模 | 用户数、API 调用次数、存储空间、项目数 | 使用量自然随价值增长 |
| 复杂度 | 高级分析、AI 功能、工作流程 | 功能需要一定的成熟度才能使用 |
| 控制 | 单点登录、SAML、审计日志、自定义角色 | 企业合规需求 |
| 支持 | SLA、专属客户成功经理、电话支持 | 愿意为服务付费 |
切勿限制: 安全功能、数据导出、基本集成。限制这些会引发不满和流失。
| 类型 | 触发条件 | 范围 | 使用时机 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 批量 | 承诺扩大规模 | 10-30% | 大量席位、多年合同 |
| 期限 | 年度承诺 | 15-25% | 月度转年度合同 |
| 竞争性 | 从竞争对手转换 | 20-40% | 匹配剩余合同价值 |
| 战略性 | 参考客户、品牌价值 | 最高 50% | 品牌知名度 + 案例研究承诺 |
保护你的定价 -- 在以下情况下切勿打折:
折扣的替代方案: 延长付款期限、额外的培训/上线支持、延长试用期、按成功里程碑解锁功能、按当前费率锁定多年。
| 指标 | 目标 | 公式 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户生命周期价值 | >3x CAC | ARPU / 月流失率 |
| 客户获取成本回收期 | <12 个月 | CAC / ARPU |
| 净收入留存率 | >100% | (期初 MRR + 扩展收入 - 收缩收入 - 流失收入)/ 期初 MRR |
| 毛利率 | >70% | (收入 - 销售成本)/ 收入 |
每种模型的深入分析、层级设计、价格上涨策略、服务定价、产品化服务模型和收入模型模板请参见 reference/pricing.md。
| 维度 | 分值 | 评估内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 市场契合度 | 25 | 问题清晰度 (10)、市场规模 (8)、时机 (7) |
| 技术契合度 | 20 | 我能否构建它 (10)、基础设施契合度 (5)、维护负担 (5) |
| GTM 契合度 | 20 | 销售复杂度 (8)、渠道可及性 (7)、竞争 (5) |
| 个人契合度 | 20 | 兴趣/精力 (8)、成长潜力 (7)、生活方式契合度 (5) |
| 经济性 | 15 | 收入潜力 (8)、实现收入的时间 (4)、风险/回报 (3) |
| 评分 | 行动 | 下一步 |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | 强烈建议争取 | 立即优先处理,分配资源 |
| 60-79 | 探索 | 值得进行有时间限制的深入分析(1-2 周) |
| 40-59 | 有条件考虑 | 搁置 -- 仅在特定因素发生变化时重新审视 |
| 0-39 | 放弃 | 拒绝 -- 机会成本过高 |
任何以下情况都应从你的评分中扣除 10-20 分:
| 级别 | 购买者 | 年均合同价值 | 周期 | 决策风格 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产品驱动增长 | 个人用户 | <$2K | 数天 | 用户即购买者,自助服务 |
| 低接触 | 经理 | $2-15K | 1-4 周 | 轻度演示,快速批准 |
| 中型市场 | 总监/副总裁 | $15-100K | 1-3 个月 | 委员会,多个利益相关者 |
| 企业级 | 高管层 | $100K-1M | 6-18 个月 | RFP、安全审查、法务 |
| 复杂 | 董事会层面 | $1M+ | 12-36 个月 | 转型项目 |
将复杂度与你的资源相匹配:
在深入分析任何机会之前,回答四个问题:
快速计算:
| 信号 | 自建 | 合作 | 购买 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 核心差异化点 | 是 | ||
| 商品化能力 | 是 | ||
| 互补优势 | 是 | ||
| 时间紧迫 | 是 | ||
| 学习价值高 | 是 | ||
| 维护负担高 | 是 | 是 | |
| 没有好的替代方案存在 | 是 |
每个维度的详细评分标准、完整的评分卡 YAML 模板、单位经济工作表、成本结构分析、盈亏平衡计算以及自建/合作决策树请参见 reference/opportunity.md。
reference/gtm.md - ICP YAML 模板、行为信号、验证清单、渠道策略、发布策略、竞争对比卡模板、定位示例reference/pricing.md - 模型深入分析、层级设计、价格上涨策略、服务定价、折扣框架、SaaS 指标仪表板reference/opportunity.md - 完整评分标准(5 个部分)、评分卡 YAML、单位经济、成本分析、盈亏平衡公式、自建/合作/购买决策树 </core_content>作为最后一步,写入 ~/.claude/skill-analytics/last-outcome-gtm-pricing.json:
{"ts":"[UTC ISO8601]","skill":"gtm-pricing","version":"1.0.0","variant":"default",
"status":"[success|partial|error]","runtime_ms":[estimated ms from start],
"metrics":{"pricing_models_evaluated":[n],"tiers_designed":[n],"gtm_channels_mapped":[n]},
"error":null,"session_id":"[YYYY-MM-DD]"}
如果某些阶段失败但产生了结果,请使用状态 "partial"。仅当没有生成任何输出时才使用 "error"。
每周安装次数
64
仓库
GitHub 星标数
6
首次出现
2026年1月23日
安全审计
安装于
opencode59
gemini-cli56
codex56
claude-code56
cursor50
github-copilot49
<quick_start> ICP scoring: 80+ = Ideal | 60-79 = Good | 40-59 = Marginal | <40 = Pass
Positioning statement:
For [target] who [need], [product] is a [category] that [benefit].
Unlike [alternative], our product [differentiator].
Value-based pricing: Price at 10-20% of quantified value delivered
Opportunity score: /100 across Market Fit, Technical Fit, GTM Fit, Personal Fit, Economics </quick_start>
<success_criteria> GTM strategy is successful when:
<core_content> Comprehensive guide for B2B go-to-market strategy, pricing, and opportunity evaluation.
| Framework | Purpose | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| ICP Development | Define ideal customer | Before any outreach |
| Positioning | Differentiate in market | Product launch, pivot |
| Messaging Hierarchy | Consistent communication | Sales enablement |
| Competitive Intel | Understand landscape | Deal strategy, positioning |
| Value-Based Pricing | Price by value delivered | Setting initial prices |
| Tier Structure | Package offering | Feature gating decisions |
| Opportunity Scoring | Evaluate fit | New client/project decisions |
Build your ICP across three dimensions, then score each prospect:
Dimension 1 -- Firmographics (who they are):
Dimension 2 -- Technographics (what they use):
Dimension 3 -- Psychographics (how they buy):
ICP Scoring Rubric:
| Score | Label | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | Ideal | Prioritize -- full outreach cadence, executive sponsorship |
| 60-79 | Good | Pursue -- standard cadence, qualify thoroughly |
| 40-59 | Marginal | Conditional -- only if specific signal changes (budget, timing) |
| <40 | Pass | Decline -- opportunity cost too high |
Behavioral Signals to Watch:
ICP Validation Checklist:
See reference/gtm.md for full YAML ICP worksheet templates and an example ICP (MEP contractors).
The 5 Components of Positioning:
Positioning Statement Template:
For [target customer segment] who [key need/pain],
[product name] is a [market category]
that [primary value proposition].
Unlike [competitive alternative],
our product [key differentiator tied to unique attribute].
Messaging Hierarchy (3 levels, max 3 differentiators each):
| Level | Audience | Message Type |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic | C-suite, board | Business outcomes, ROI, risk reduction |
| Solution | Directors, VPs | Capability, integration, workflow improvement |
| Persona | End users, admins | Features, UX, daily workflow benefits |
Competitive Battle Card Essentials: For each top-3 competitor, document:
See reference/gtm.md for battle card template, positioning examples, and competitive positioning framework.
GTM Motion Selection:
| Motion | ACV | Sales Cycle | Team Needed | CAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product-Led Growth (PLG) | <$5K | Days | Growth/product | Low |
| Sales-Assisted | $5-50K | Weeks | SDR + AE | Medium |
| Enterprise | $50K+ | Months | AE + SE + CSM | High |
| Partner/Channel | Variable | Variable | Partner Manager | Variable |
Channel Mix: 60-70% primary motion, 20-30% secondary, 10% experimental.
Launch Checklist Milestones:
See reference/gtm.md for full launch checklists, channel strategy details, and complexity-to-resource matching.
Step 1 -- Quantify customer value:
Total Value = Time Savings + Revenue Impact + Cost Avoidance
Time Savings: Hours saved/month x Hourly rate x 12
Revenue Impact: Additional revenue enabled per year
Cost Avoidance: Costs eliminated or reduced per year
Step 2 -- Set price at 10-20% of quantified value:
Step 3 -- Validate against willingness-to-pay:
| Model | Best For | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flat rate | Simple products | Easy to understand | Doesn't scale with value |
| Per seat | Team tools | Predictable, scales with org | Discourages adoption |
| Usage-based | APIs, infra | Aligns cost with value | Unpredictable revenue |
| Tiered (Good/Better/Best) | Feature differentiation | Anchoring, clear upgrade path | Complex to design |
| Hybrid (seat + usage) | Enterprise SaaS | Predictable base + upside | Complex billing |
Tier structure principles:
Feature Gating Rules:
| Gate By | Examples | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Scale | Users, API calls, storage, projects | Usage naturally grows with value |
| Sophistication | Advanced analytics, AI features, workflows | Features require maturity to use |
| Control | SSO, SAML, audit logs, custom roles | Enterprise compliance needs |
| Support | SLA, dedicated CSM, phone support | Willingness to pay for service |
Never gate: Security features, data export, basic integrations. Gating these breeds resentment and churn.
| Type | Trigger | Range | Use When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume | Commitment to scale | 10-30% | Large seat count, multi-year |
| Term | Annual commitment | 15-25% | Monthly-to-annual conversion |
| Competitive | Switching from competitor | 20-40% | Match remaining contract value |
| Strategic | Reference customer, logo value | Up to 50% | Brand-name + case study commitment |
Protect your pricing -- never discount when:
Alternatives to discounting: Extended payment terms, additional training/onboarding, extended trial period, success-milestone feature unlocks, multi-year lock-in at current rate.
| Metric | Target | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| LTV | >3x CAC | ARPU / monthly churn rate |
| CAC Payback | <12 months | CAC / ARPU |
| NRR | >100% | (Start MRR + expansion - contraction - churn) / Start MRR |
| Gross Margin | >70% | (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue |
See reference/pricing.md for per-model deep dives, price increase playbook, services pricing, productized service model, and revenue model templates.
| Dimension | Points | What to Assess |
|---|---|---|
| Market Fit | 25 | Problem clarity (10), market size (8), timing (7) |
| Technical Fit | 20 | Can I build it (10), infrastructure fit (5), maintenance burden (5) |
| GTM Fit | 20 | Sales complexity (8), channel access (7), competition (5) |
| Personal Fit | 20 | Interest/energy (8), growth potential (7), lifestyle fit (5) |
| Economics | 15 | Revenue potential (8), time to revenue (4), risk/reward (3) |
| Score | Action | Next Step |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | STRONG PURSUE | Prioritize immediately, allocate resources |
| 60-79 | EXPLORE | Worth a time-boxed deep dive (1-2 weeks) |
| 40-59 | CONDITIONAL | Park it -- revisit only if a specific factor changes |
| 0-39 | PASS | Decline -- opportunity cost too high |
Any of these should subtract 10-20 points from your score:
| Level | Buyer | ACV | Cycle | Decision Style |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLG | Individual user | <$2K | Days | User = buyer, self-serve |
| Low-Touch | Manager | $2-15K | 1-4 weeks | Light demo, quick approval |
| Mid-Market | Director/VP | $15-100K | 1-3 months | Committee, multiple stakeholders |
| Enterprise | C-suite | $100K-1M | 6-18 months | RFP, security review, legal |
| Complex | Board-level | $1M+ | 12-36 months | Transformation project |
Match complexity to your resources:
Before deep-diving any opportunity, answer four questions:
Quick math:
| Signal | Build | Partner | Buy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core differentiator | Yes | ||
| Commodity capability | Yes | ||
| Complementary strength | Yes | ||
| Time-critical | Yes | ||
| Learning value high | Yes | ||
| Maintenance burden high | Yes | Yes | |
| No good alternative exists | Yes |
See reference/opportunity.md for detailed scoring rubrics per dimension, full scorecard YAML templates, unit economics worksheets, cost structure analysis, break-even calculations, and build-vs-partner decision trees.
reference/gtm.md - ICP YAML templates, behavioral signals, validation checklist, channel strategy, launch playbooks, battle card template, positioning examplesreference/pricing.md - Model deep dives, tier design, price increase playbook, services pricing, discount framework, SaaS metrics dashboardreference/opportunity.md - Full scoring rubrics (5 sections), scorecard YAML, unit economics, cost analysis, break-even formulas, build/partner/buy decision trees </core_content>As the final step, write to ~/.claude/skill-analytics/last-outcome-gtm-pricing.json:
{"ts":"[UTC ISO8601]","skill":"gtm-pricing","version":"1.0.0","variant":"default",
"status":"[success|partial|error]","runtime_ms":[estimated ms from start],
"metrics":{"pricing_models_evaluated":[n],"tiers_designed":[n],"gtm_channels_mapped":[n]},
"error":null,"session_id":"[YYYY-MM-DD]"}
Use status "partial" if some stages failed but results were produced. Use "error" only if no output was generated.
Weekly Installs
64
Repository
GitHub Stars
6
First Seen
Jan 23, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
opencode59
gemini-cli56
codex56
claude-code56
cursor50
github-copilot49
任务估算指南:敏捷开发故事点、计划扑克、T恤尺码法详解
10,500 周安装
OpenClaw 指挥中心 - AI 工作团队任务控制面板,实时监控会话与系统状态
75 周安装
OpenZeppelin Stylus 合约设置指南:Rust 智能合约开发与部署教程
74 周安装
Notion自动化指南:通过Rube MCP与Composio实现页面、数据库与内容管理
72 周安装
Vercel自动化部署与监控指南 - 通过Rube MCP实现项目自动化管理
71 周安装
技术债务可视化工具 - 识别高息技术债务,优化代码重构优先级
78 周安装
Salesforce B2C Commerce 元数据开发指南:自定义属性、对象与站点偏好设置
71 周安装