重要前提
安装AI Skills的关键前提是:必须科学上网,且开启TUN模式,这一点至关重要,直接决定安装能否顺利完成,在此郑重提醒三遍:科学上网,科学上网,科学上网。查看完整安装教程 →
spin-selling by guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill spin-selling掌握全球企业销售团队信赖的顾问式销售方法论。运用尼尔·雷克汉姆基于研究的提问序列,发掘需求并完成复杂交易。
| 方面 | 详情 |
|---|---|
| 来源 | 尼尔·雷克汉姆 - SPIN 销售法 (1988) |
| 核心原则 | "销售拜访中提问的目的不是为了获取信息,而是为了获得承诺。" |
| 研究基础 | Huthwaite International 在 12 年间分析了超过 35,000 次销售拜访 |
| 为何重要 | 在复杂销售中,传统的成交技巧会失效。成功来自于按正确顺序提出正确的问题,帮助买家自己发现他们对你的解决方案的需求。 |
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
| Claude 负责 | 您决定 |
|---|
| 构建制作流程 | 最终创意方向 |
| 建议技术方法 | 设备和工具选择 |
| 创建模板和清单 | 质量标准 |
| 识别最佳实践 | 品牌/声音决策 |
| 生成脚本大纲 | 最终脚本批准 |
I'm preparing for a sales call with [company/role].
Help me develop SPIN questions for the discovery phase.
Context: [what you sell, what you know about them]
Here's a sales conversation I'm struggling with:
[Describe the situation]
Apply SPIN methodology to help me advance this deal.
I want to practice SPIN questioning for [product/service].
Guide me through the sequence with examples.
## SPIN 提问序列
### 为何此序列有效
传统销售:谈论产品 → 处理异议 → 成交
SPIN 销售:提问 → 买家发现需求 → 买家自我说服
**来自雷克汉姆研究的关键洞察:**
在复杂销售中,成交技巧与成功之间的关系实际上是**负相关**。使用的成交技巧越多,成功率越低。
真正预测成功的是:提问的数量和质量。
### 四种问题类型
S - 情境性问题
收集事实和背景信息
"你们有多少个办公地点?"
"你们目前使用什么系统?"
P - 问题性问题
探究困难和不满之处
"你们在...方面面临什么挑战?"
"当前系统在哪些方面存在不足?"
I - 暗示性问题
深化问题的严重性
"这对...有什么影响?"
"这如何影响你们团队的生产力?"
N - 需求-回报性问题
聚焦于解决问题的价值
"如果你们能够...,会有什么帮助?"
"如果...,对你们的团队意味着什么?"
## 情境性问题
### 目的
收集关于买家现有情况的事实。
### 特点
- 基于事实,而非观点
- 为更深层次的问题设定背景
- 必要但需谨慎使用
- 过多 = 无聊的访谈
### 示例
- "有多少员工使用当前系统?"
- "你们目前处理 [X] 的流程是什么?"
- "还有谁参与这个决策?"
- "你们做出改变的时间表是怎样的?"
- "你们为此分配了多少预算?"
### 警告
高绩效者比普通绩效者问**更少**的情境性问题。
他们事先进行研究,只询问无法从其他地方找到的信息。
### 最佳实践
- 通话前进行研究
- 只询问真正需要的信息
- 与其他问题类型混合使用
- 不要像审问一样
## 问题性问题
### 目的
探究问题、困难和不满。
### 特点
- 发现痛点
- 开始培养需求
- 比情境性问题更有力
- 通过理解建立融洽关系
### 示例
- "你们在...方面遇到什么挑战?"
- "你们对 [当前解决方案] 的满意度如何?"
- "是什么让 [流程] 变得困难?"
- "你们在哪里看到效率低下?"
- "关于...,最让团队感到沮丧的是什么?"
- "这导致了什么问题?"
### 进阶
从一般 → 具体:
1. "[某个方面] 对你们来说效果如何?"
2. "你们面临什么挑战?"
3. "其中哪个最紧迫?"
4. "能详细说说吗?"
### 关键洞察
大多数销售人员没有问足够多的问题性问题。
他们假设自己知道问题所在,或者急于推介。
## 暗示性问题
### 目的
深化问题的严重性和紧迫性。
### 特点
- **最**有力的问题类型
- 让问题感觉更严重、更紧迫
- 将问题与更广泛的业务影响联系起来
- 为变革建立理由
### 魔力
暗示性问题并不增加新信息。
它们帮助买家**认识到**其问题的全部影响。
### 示例
- "这对生产力有什么影响?"
- "这如何影响你们团队的士气?"
- "如果不解决这个问题会怎样?"
- "这如何影响你们实现 [目标] 的能力?"
- "一年下来这要花费多少成本?"
- "这个问题如何影响你们的客户?"
- "这还影响哪些其他方面?"
### 序列模式
问题:"手动数据录入很慢。"
暗示:"这如何影响你们的响应时间?"
暗示:"响应变慢对客户满意度有什么影响?"
暗示:"客户满意度如何影响续约率?"
暗示:"续约率下降 5% 每年会带来多少成本?"
### 构建痛点堆栈
每个暗示性问题应该:
- 关联到他们关心的事情
- 让问题感觉更严重
- 为变革创造紧迫感
- 朝着你的解决方案的优势方向构建
### 警告
过多的暗示性问题可能会让人感到沮丧。
与需求-回报性问题保持平衡。
## 需求-回报性问题
### 目的
让买家阐明解决问题的价值。
### 特点
- 积极且以解决方案为中心
- 买家自我说服
- 减少异议
- 建立承诺
### 心理学原理
当**买家**说出某物为何有价值时,
他们比你**说**出来时更相信它。
### 示例
- "如果你们能够 [某种能力],会有什么帮助?"
- "如果 [改进],对你们的团队意味着什么?"
- "如果你们可以 [解决问题],那将允许你们做什么?"
- "拥有 [功能] 会有多大用处?"
- "从 [改进] 中你们会看到什么好处?"
- "[能力] 如何帮助你们实现 [他们的目标]?"
### 转换模式
暗示:"那些手动错误的成本是多少?"
需求-回报:"如果你们能消除这些错误,那将如何影响你们的盈利能力?"
需求-回报:"你们的团队还能专注于其他什么事情?"
### 测试
如果买家正在自己阐明价值,
说明你问了很好的需求-回报性问题。
如果你在解释价值,说明你推介得太早了。
## SPIN 对话框架
### 通话前
1. **研究情境事实** (最小化情境性问题)
2. **假设问题** (基于角色/行业)
3. **映射暗示** (针对每个问题)
4. **准备需求-回报** (与你的解决方案相关联)
### 通话中
**开场 (5%)**
- 明确陈述目的
- 获得提问许可
- 确定时间框架
**调查 - SPIN 序列 (60%)**
- 情境:确认/收集必要的背景信息
- 问题:探究挑战
- 暗示:培养紧迫感
- 需求-回报:让他们阐明价值
**展示能力 (25%)**
- 展示你如何解决**他们**陈述的问题
- 将功能与他们阐明的需求联系起来
- 使用他们回答需求-回报性问题时的语言
**获得承诺 (10%)**
- 提出合理的下一步
- 推进销售 (不仅仅是继续)
- 获得具体的承诺
### 调查比例
**普通绩效者:**
60% 情境,30% 问题,10% 其他
**顶级绩效者:**
20% 情境,30% 问题,30% 暗示,20% 需求-回报
## 按销售阶段的 SPIN
### 发现通话
**目标:** 了解是否存在匹配
**重点:**
- 情境:30% (你正在了解)
- 问题:40%
- 暗示:20%
- 需求-回报:10%
**推进:** 演示或与利益相关者进行更深入的发现
### 演示/展示
**目标:** 针对陈述的需求展示能力
**重点:**
- 回顾发现阶段的问题和暗示
- 需求-回报:40% ("这将如何帮助?")
- 演示:与他们的需求相关联
- 问题/暗示:20% (加深理解)
**推进:** 技术评估、提案或决策者会议
### 提案/谈判
**目标:** 成交
**重点:**
- 需求-回报:50% (强化价值)
- 暗示:30% (不采取行动的成本)
- 使用 SPIN 处理异议
**推进:** 签署合同、采购订单、安排启动会议
输入:
"我向营销机构销售项目管理软件。我有一场与一家 50 人机构的发现通话。帮我准备 SPIN 问题。"
输出:
通话前,查找:
背景问题:
决策问题:
效率问题:
可见性问题:
扩展问题:
来自效率问题:
来自可见性问题:
来自扩展问题:
效率价值:
可见性价值:
扩展价值:
开场:
"感谢您抽出时间。今天的目标是了解你们如何管理项目,看看我们是否有可能提供帮助。
我有一些问题——然后很乐意分享我们在类似机构看到的有效方法。
听起来可以吗?"
→ 确认当前工具 (情境)
→ "最大的挑战是什么..." (问题)
→ "这如何影响..." (暗示)
→ "如果你们能...,那将如何帮助?" (需求-回报)
→ 用他们的话总结他们的需求
→ "看看我们如何解决这个问题会有用吗?"
输入:
"我进行了一次很好的发现通话,但交易停滞了。潜在客户说'我们仍在评估中。' 我如何使用 SPIN 重新接洽?"
输出:
"仍在评估" 通常意味着:
不要: 发送案例研究或催促会议 要: 重启 SPIN 对话
邮件模板:
主题:关于 [来自发现的特定问题] 的快速问题
您好 [姓名],
我一直在思考您提到的关于 [特定问题] 的事情。
我很好奇——自从我们上次交谈以来,[该问题的暗示]
对事情产生了什么影响?
只是想确保在我们下次交谈前,我理解您的情况。
[姓名]
1. 用问题性问题回顾 "上次我们交谈时,您提到了 [问题]。这仍然是首要任务吗?"
如果是 → 深化。如果不是 → 发现变化。
2. 用暗示性问题深化 这些可能在第一次时比较弱。
3. 用需求-回报性问题重置
4. 发现隐藏障碍
| 停滞原因 | SPIN 方法 |
|---|---|
| 不紧迫 | 更多暗示性问题 |
| 预算顾虑 | 暗示:不采取行动的成本 |
| 利益相关者阻碍 | 问题:"他们的顾虑是什么?" |
| 竞争对手评估 | 需求-回报:让他们阐明你为何不同 |
| 价值不清晰 | 需求-回报:"X 将如何帮助你们实现 Y?" |
输入:
"我向小企业销售每月 99 美元的 HR 工具。SPIN 对于较小的交易来说是否大材小用?"
输出:
SPIN 序列适用于任何规模的交易。但深度会改变。
企业级 ($50K+): 跨多次通话的深度 SPIN 中型市场 ($5K-50K): 在 1-2 次通话中完成完整 SPIN 中小型企业 (<$5K): 在一次通话中压缩的 SPIN
时间: 15-20 分钟发现 + 演示
情境 (2 分钟):
问题 (5 分钟):
暗示 (3 分钟):
需求-回报 (5 分钟):
演示 (5-10 分钟):
"在我展示任何东西之前,快速问一下——
你们目前处理 [某个方面] 的方式中,最大的痛点是什么?"
[让他们说 - 问题]
"有意思。当这种情况发生时,它如何影响 [时间/金钱/压力]?"
[关联到影响 - 暗示]
"明白了。所以如果你们能 [解决那个问题],你们会用那些额外的 [时间/金钱/安心] 做什么?"
[让他们阐明价值 - 需求-回报]
"很好。让我向您展示我们具体如何处理这个问题..."
[演示聚焦于他们的问题]
## 通话前
### 研究
□ 公司规模、行业、发展阶段
□ 他们可能使用的当前解决方案
□ 近期新闻、融资、变化
□ 关键人物和角色
□ 基于角色/行业的可能问题
### 准备问题
□ 2-3 个情境性问题 (只问无法研究到的)
□ 4-5 个问题性问题 (基于研究的假设)
□ 5-7 个暗示性问题 (针对每个可能的问题)
□ 3-4 个需求-回报性问题 (与你的解决方案相关联)
### 定义成功
□ 你会要求什么承诺?
□ 合理的下一步是什么?
□ 还需要谁参与?
## [产品/服务] SPIN 问题
### 情境性问题
1. [背景问题]
2. [流程问题]
3. [决策问题]
### 问题性问题
1. [效率问题]
2. [成本问题]
3. [质量问题]
4. [扩展问题]
5. [风险问题]
### 暗示性问题
1. 针对问题 1: [对 X 的影响]
2. 针对问题 1: [对 Y 的影响]
3. 针对问题 2: [对 X 的影响]
4. 针对问题 2: [对 Y 的影响]
5. [一般业务影响]
6. [个人/职业影响]
7. [团队影响]
### 需求-回报性问题
1. [解决问题 1 的价值]
2. [解决问题 2 的价值]
3. [一般改进价值]
4. [未来状态价值]
name: spin-selling
category: sales
subcategory: methodology
version: 1.0
author: MKTG Skills
source_expert: Neil Rackham
source_work: SPIN Selling
difficulty: intermediate
estimated_value: $3,000+ sales training program
tags: [sales, B2B, enterprise, discovery, questions, consultative, complex sales]
created: 2026-01-25
updated: 2026-01-25
每周安装次数
50
代码仓库
GitHub 星标数
57
首次出现
2026年2月13日
安全审计
安装于
opencode49
gemini-cli49
codex48
github-copilot47
cursor47
amp46
Master the consultative sales methodology trusted by enterprise sales teams worldwide. Use Neil Rackham's research-backed question sequence to uncover needs and close complex deals.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Source | Neil Rackham - SPIN Selling (1988) |
| Core Principle | "The purpose of questions in a sales call is not to get information. It's to get commitment." |
| Research Base | 35,000+ sales calls analyzed over 12 years by Huthwaite International |
| Why This Matters | In complex sales, traditional closing techniques fail. Success comes from asking the right questions in the right sequence to help buyers discover their own need for your solution. |
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Structures production workflow | Final creative direction |
| Suggests technical approaches | Equipment and tool choices |
| Creates templates and checklists | Quality standards |
| Identifies best practices | Brand/voice decisions |
| Generates script outlines | Final script approval |
I'm preparing for a sales call with [company/role].
Help me develop SPIN questions for the discovery phase.
Context: [what you sell, what you know about them]
Here's a sales conversation I'm struggling with:
[Describe the situation]
Apply SPIN methodology to help me advance this deal.
I want to practice SPIN questioning for [product/service].
Guide me through the sequence with examples.
## The SPIN Question Sequence
### Why This Sequence Works
Traditional sales: Talk about your product → Handle objections → Close
SPIN sales: Ask questions → Buyer discovers need → Buyer sells themselves
**Key insight from Rackham's research:**
In complex sales, the relationship between closing techniques
and success is actually NEGATIVE. The more closing techniques
used, the lower the success rate.
What DOES predict success: The number and quality of questions asked.
### The Four Question Types
S - Situation Questions
Gather facts and background
"How many locations do you have?"
"What system do you use currently?"
P - Problem Questions
Explore difficulties and dissatisfactions
"What challenges are you facing with...?"
"Where does the current system fall short?"
I - Implication Questions
Develop the seriousness of the problem
"What impact does that have on...?"
"How does that affect your team's productivity?"
N - Need-Payoff Questions
Focus on the value of solving the problem
"How would it help if you could...?"
"What would it mean to your team if...?"
## Situation Questions
### Purpose
Gather facts about the buyer's existing situation.
### Characteristics
- Factual, not opinion-based
- Sets context for deeper questions
- Essential but use sparingly
- Too many = boring interview
### Examples
- "How many employees use the current system?"
- "What's your current process for [X]?"
- "Who else is involved in this decision?"
- "What's your timeline for making a change?"
- "What budget have you allocated?"
### Warning
High performers ask FEWER situation questions than average performers.
They research beforehand and only ask what they can't find elsewhere.
### Best Practice
- Research before the call
- Ask only what you genuinely need
- Mix with other question types
- Don't interrogate
## Problem Questions
### Purpose
Explore problems, difficulties, and dissatisfactions.
### Characteristics
- Uncover pain points
- Start to develop needs
- More powerful than situation questions
- Build rapport through understanding
### Examples
- "What challenges are you experiencing with...?"
- "How satisfied are you with [current solution]?"
- "What makes [process] difficult?"
- "Where do you see inefficiencies?"
- "What frustrates your team most about...?"
- "What problems has that caused?"
### Progression
Move from general → specific:
1. "How's [area] working for you?"
2. "What challenges do you face?"
3. "Which of those is most pressing?"
4. "Can you tell me more about that?"
### Key Insight
Most salespeople don't ask enough problem questions.
They assume they know the problems or rush to pitch.
## Implication Questions
### Purpose
Develop the seriousness and urgency of problems.
### Characteristics
- THE most powerful question type
- Makes problems feel larger and more urgent
- Connects problems to broader business impact
- Builds the case for change
### The Magic
Implication questions don't add new information.
They help the buyer REALIZE the full impact of their problem.
### Examples
- "What effect does that have on productivity?"
- "How does that impact your team's morale?"
- "What happens if this isn't addressed?"
- "How does this affect your ability to [goal]?"
- "What's the cost of that over a year?"
- "How does that problem impact your customers?"
- "What other areas does this affect?"
### Sequence Pattern
Problem: "Manual data entry is slow."
Implication: "How does that affect your response time?"
Implication: "What impact does slower response have on customer satisfaction?"
Implication: "How does customer satisfaction affect renewals?"
Implication: "What does a 5% drop in renewals cost annually?"
### Building the Pain Stack
Each implication question should:
- Connect to something they care about
- Make the problem feel bigger
- Create urgency for change
- Build toward your solution's strengths
### Warning
Too many implication questions can feel depressing.
Balance with Need-Payoff questions.
## Need-Payoff Questions
### Purpose
Get the buyer to articulate the value of solving their problem.
### Characteristics
- Positive and solution-focused
- Buyer sells themselves
- Reduces objections
- Builds commitment
### The Psychology
When BUYERS say why something is valuable,
they believe it more than when YOU say it.
### Examples
- "How would it help if you could [capability]?"
- "What would it mean for your team if [improvement]?"
- "If you could [solve problem], what would that allow you to do?"
- "How useful would it be to have [feature]?"
- "What benefits would you see from [improvement]?"
- "How would [capability] help with [their goal]?"
### Transition Pattern
Implication: "What's the cost of those manual errors?"
Need-Payoff: "If you could eliminate those errors, how would that affect your profitability?"
Need-Payoff: "What else would your team be able to focus on?"
### The Test
If the buyer is articulating the value themselves,
you've asked good Need-Payoff questions.
If you're explaining the value, you're pitching too early.
## SPIN Conversation Framework
### Before the Call
1. **Research situation facts** (minimize situation questions)
2. **Hypothesize problems** (based on role/industry)
3. **Map implications** (for each problem)
4. **Prepare need-payoff** (tied to your solution)
### During the Call
**Opening (5%)**
- State purpose clearly
- Get permission to ask questions
- Establish time frame
**Investigation - SPIN Sequence (60%)**
- Situation: Confirm/gather essential context
- Problem: Explore challenges
- Implication: Develop urgency
- Need-Payoff: Have them articulate value
**Demonstrating Capability (25%)**
- Show how you solve THEIR stated problems
- Connect features to their articulated needs
- Use their language from Need-Payoff answers
**Obtaining Commitment (10%)**
- Propose logical next step
- Advance the sale (not just continue)
- Get specific commitment
### The Investigation Math
**Average performers:**
60% Situation, 30% Problem, 10% other
**Top performers:**
20% Situation, 30% Problem, 30% Implication, 20% Need-Payoff
## SPIN by Sales Stage
### Discovery Call
**Goal:** Understand if there's a fit
**Focus:**
- Situation: 30% (you're learning)
- Problem: 40%
- Implication: 20%
- Need-Payoff: 10%
**Advance:** Demo or deeper discovery with stakeholders
### Demo/Presentation
**Goal:** Show capability against stated needs
**Focus:**
- Recap problems and implications from discovery
- Need-Payoff: 40% ("How would this help?")
- Demonstration: Tied to their needs
- Problem/Implication: 20% (deepen understanding)
**Advance:** Technical evaluation, proposal, or decision-maker meeting
### Proposal/Negotiation
**Goal:** Close the deal
**Focus:**
- Need-Payoff: 50% (reinforce value)
- Implication: 30% (cost of not acting)
- Handle objections with SPIN
**Advance:** Signed contract, PO, kickoff scheduled
Input:
"I sell project management software to marketing agencies. I have a discovery call with a 50-person agency. Help me prepare SPIN questions."
Output:
Before the call, find:
Context questions:
Decision questions:
Efficiency problems:
Visibility problems:
Scaling problems:
From efficiency problems:
From visibility problems:
From scaling problems:
Efficiency value:
Visibility value:
Scale value:
Opening:
"Thanks for making time. The goal today is to understand how you're
managing projects and see if there might be ways we could help.
I have some questions—then happy to share what we've seen work
at similar agencies. Sound good?"
→ Confirm current tools (Situation)
→ "What's the biggest challenge..." (Problem)
→ "How does that affect..." (Implication)
→ "If you could..., how would that help?" (Need-Payoff)
→ Summarize their needs in their words
→ "Would it be useful to see how we've solved this?"
Input:
"I had a great discovery call but the deal is stalled. The prospect says 'we're still evaluating.' How do I use SPIN to re-engage?"
Output:
"Still evaluating" usually means:
Don't: Send case studies or push for meeting Do: Restart the SPIN conversation
Email template:
Subject: Quick question about [specific problem from discovery]
Hi [Name],
I've been thinking about what you shared regarding [specific problem].
I'm curious—since we spoke, how has [implication of that problem]
been affecting things?
Just want to make sure I understand your situation before our next
conversation.
[Name]
1. Recap with Problem Question "Last time we talked, you mentioned [problem]. Is that still a top priority?"
If yes → deepen. If no → discover what changed.
2. Deepen with Implication Questions These were likely weak the first time.
3. Reset with Need-Payoff
4. Surface Hidden Obstacles
| Stall Reason | SPIN Approach |
|---|---|
| Not urgent | More Implication questions |
| Budget concerns | Implication: cost of inaction |
| Stakeholder blocker | Problem: "What's their concern?" |
| Competitor eval | Need-Payoff: have them articulate why you're different |
| Unclear value | Need-Payoff: "How would X help you achieve Y?" |
Input:
"I sell a $99/month HR tool to small businesses. Is SPIN overkill for smaller deals?"
Output:
The SPIN sequence works at any deal size. But the depth changes.
Enterprise ($50K+): Deep SPIN across multiple calls Mid-market ($5K-50K): Full SPIN in 1-2 calls SMB ( <$5K): Compressed SPIN in one call
Time: 15-20 minute discovery + demo
Situation (2 min):
Problem (5 min):
Implication (3 min):
Need-Payoff (5 min):
Demo (5-10 min):
"Before I show you anything, quick question—
what's the biggest headache with how you're handling [area] today?"
[Let them talk - Problem]
"Interesting. When that happens, how does it affect [time/money/stress]?"
[Connect to impact - Implication]
"Got it. So if you could [solve that], what would you do with that
extra [time/money/peace of mind]?"
[Have them articulate value - Need-Payoff]
"Perfect. Let me show you exactly how we handle that..."
[Demo focused on their problem]
## Before the Call
### Research
□ Company size, industry, growth stage
□ Current solutions they might use
□ Recent news, funding, changes
□ Key people and roles involved
□ Likely problems based on role/industry
### Prepare Questions
□ 2-3 Situation questions (only what you can't research)
□ 4-5 Problem questions (hypotheses based on research)
□ 5-7 Implication questions (for each likely problem)
□ 3-4 Need-Payoff questions (tied to your solution)
### Define Success
□ What commitment will you ask for?
□ What's the logical next step?
□ Who else needs to be involved?
## [Product/Service] SPIN Questions
### Situation Questions
1. [Context question]
2. [Process question]
3. [Decision question]
### Problem Questions
1. [Efficiency problem]
2. [Cost problem]
3. [Quality problem]
4. [Scale problem]
5. [Risk problem]
### Implication Questions
1. For problem 1: [Impact on X]
2. For problem 1: [Impact on Y]
3. For problem 2: [Impact on X]
4. For problem 2: [Impact on Y]
5. [General business impact]
6. [Personal/career impact]
7. [Team impact]
### Need-Payoff Questions
1. [Value of solving problem 1]
2. [Value of solving problem 2]
3. [General improvement value]
4. [Future state value]
Mode : cyborg
name: spin-selling category: sales subcategory: methodology version: 1.0 author: MKTG Skills source_expert: Neil Rackham source_work: SPIN Selling difficulty: intermediate estimated_value: $3,000+ sales training program tags: [sales, B2B, enterprise, discovery, questions, consultative, complex sales] created: 2026-01-25 updated: 2026-01-25
Weekly Installs
50
Repository
GitHub Stars
57
First Seen
Feb 13, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
opencode49
gemini-cli49
codex48
github-copilot47
cursor47
amp46
AI代理协作核心原则:提升开发效率的6大Agentic开发原则指南
7,600 周安装