skill-discovery by oimiragieo/agent-studio
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill skill-discovery如果某项技能适用于您的任务,您别无选择。必须使用它。
这是不可协商的。这不是可选的。您不能通过合理化来规避这一点。
在 Claude Code 中: 使用 Skill 工具或直接读取技能文件。当您调用技能时,其内容会被加载并呈现给您 - 请直接遵循。
在其他环境中: 请查阅您平台的文档以了解技能如何加载。
在任何响应或行动之前,调用相关或被请求的技能。 即使某项技能只有 1% 的可能适用,您也应该调用该技能来检查。如果调用的技能最终不适用于当前情况,您无需使用它。
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
这些想法意味着停止——您正在合理化:
| 想法 | 现实 |
|---|---|
| "这只是个简单的问题" | 问题就是任务。检查技能。 |
| "我需要先了解更多上下文" | 技能检查优先于澄清问题。 |
| "让我先探索代码库" | 技能会告诉您如何探索。先检查。 |
| "我可以快速检查 git/文件" | 文件缺乏对话上下文。检查技能。 |
| "让我先收集信息" | 技能会告诉您如何收集信息。 |
| "这不需要正式的技能" | 如果技能存在,就使用它。 |
| "我记得这个技能" | 技能会演变。阅读当前版本。 |
| "这不算任务" | 行动 = 任务。检查技能。 |
| "这个技能太小题大做了" | 简单的事情会变得复杂。使用它。 |
| "我先做这一件事" | 在做任何事情之前先检查。 |
| "这感觉很有成效" | 无纪律的行动会浪费时间。技能可以防止这一点。 |
| "我知道那是什么意思" | 知道概念不等于使用技能。调用它。 |
当多个技能可能适用时,请按此顺序使用:
"让我们构建 X" -> 先头脑风暴,然后实现技能。"修复这个 bug" -> 先调试,然后领域特定技能。
严格型(TDD、调试):严格遵守。不要偏离纪律。
灵活型(模式):根据上下文调整原则。
技能本身会告诉您属于哪种类型。
指令说明的是做什么,而不是怎么做。"添加 X" 或 "修复 Y" 并不意味着可以跳过工作流程。
开始前: 阅读 .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
完成后:
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md.claude/context/memory/issues.md.claude/context/memory/decisions.md假设会被中断: 如果内容没有存入记忆,就等于没有发生过。
每周安装数
74
仓库
GitHub 星标数
17
首次出现时间
2026年1月27日
安全审计
安装于
github-copilot73
gemini-cli72
cursor71
codex70
kimi-cli70
opencode70
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool or read skill files directly. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you - follow it directly.
In other environments: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
These thoughts mean STOP - you're rationalizing:
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept != using the skill. Invoke it. |
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
"Let's build X" -> brainstorming first, then implementation skills. "Fix this bug" -> debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
Rigid (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
Flexible (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
The skill itself tells you which.
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.
Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing:
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md.claude/context/memory/issues.md.claude/context/memory/decisions.mdASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
Weekly Installs
74
Repository
GitHub Stars
17
First Seen
Jan 27, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
github-copilot73
gemini-cli72
cursor71
codex70
kimi-cli70
opencode70
AI 代码实施计划编写技能 | 自动化开发任务分解与 TDD 流程规划工具
50,900 周安装
合规审计专家:SOC2、HIPAA、GDPR、PCI DSS 合规审计、差距分析与整改指导
144 周安装
GitHuman AI代码审查工具 - 可视化审查AI生成代码变更,支持行内评论和待办事项管理
148 周安装
社交媒体内容创作与管理技能:LinkedIn/X/Reddit/Discord 平台自动化工具
145 周安装
使用 bslib 构建现代化 Shiny 应用:Bootstrap 5 仪表盘与 UI 组件库
142 周安装
Python PDF处理全指南:合并拆分、文本表格提取、创建PDF文件
142 周安装
Mux视频平台开发指南:视频流、直播、播放器集成与AI工作流
83 周安装