重要前提
安装AI Skills的关键前提是:必须科学上网,且开启TUN模式,这一点至关重要,直接决定安装能否顺利完成,在此郑重提醒三遍:科学上网,科学上网,科学上网。查看完整安装教程 →
not-ai-writer by dimitrigilbert/ai-skills
npx skills add https://github.com/dimitrigilbert/ai-skills --skill not-ai-writer提供专业指导,帮助您创作出真实、具有人类语感的内容,避免常见的人工智能生成写作模式。本技能可帮助您识别并消除词汇、结构、语气和格式中的人工智能标记。
何时使用此技能:
使用此快速检查清单,在一分钟内扫描任何内容:
搜索以下顶级人工智能警示词:
统计正式过渡词:
查看句子长度:
检查个性:
评估格式模式:
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
任何一项检查未通过? 使用下面的策略来修复它。
人工智能模型持续过度使用一些在人类写作中很少出现的特定词语。这些是最可疑的。
十大明显迹象:
| AI 词汇 | 替代词 | 示例 |
|---|---|---|
| delve | examine, explore, study, look into | "We examine the data" 而非 "We delve into the data" |
| tapestry | mix, combination, blend | "A blend of techniques" 而非 "A tapestry of techniques" |
| symphony | combination, working together | "Systems working together" 而非 "A symphony of systems" |
| underscore | highlight, emphasize, show | "This highlights the problem" 而非 "This underscores the problem" |
| meticulous | careful, thorough, detailed | "Careful analysis" 而非 "Meticulous analysis" |
| realm | area, field, space, domain | "In this field" 而非 "In this realm" |
| comprehensive | complete, full, thorough | "A full review" 而非 "A comprehensive review" |
| holistic | complete, full, all-inclusive | "A full approach" 而非 "A holistic approach" |
| intricate | complex, detailed | "Complex details" 而非 "Intricate details" |
| impressively | notably, remarkably, very | "Notably effective" 而非 "Impressively effective" |
应避免的行动动词: dive, unlock, unleash, harness, leverage, orchestrate, foster, elevate, align, bolster, burgeon, captivate, catalyze, compel, demystify, elucidate
应替换的通用形容词: significant, important, effective, essential, valuable, crucial, noteworthy
完整词汇列表,请参阅 VOCABULARY.md
人工智能过度使用正式的过渡短语,使文本感觉僵硬且学术化。
过度使用的正式过渡词:
递进: moreover, furthermore, in addition, additionally, also, likewise 因果: consequently, therefore, thus, hence, as a result 总结: in summary, in conclusion, overall, to summarize 引导: "It's important to note," "It's worth noting that," "Remember that"
自然的替代方案:
示例:
AI: "The system is efficient. Furthermore, it is user-friendly. Therefore, we recommend it."
Human: "The system is efficient and user-friendly. We recommend it."
更多过渡词指导,请参阅 VOCABULARY.md
人工智能生成的文本显示出较低的突发性(句子变化)和较低的困惑度(词语不可预测性)。
低突发性的迹象:
快速提升句子多样性的方法:
之前(低突发性): "The system is effective. It is important for users. It helps them work faster. The results are valuable."
之后(高突发性): "This system works. When you need it most, it's there—transforming how users work, making the impossible possible. The results? Game-changing."
详细的结构指导,请参阅 STRUCTURE.md
人工智能写作缺乏个性、观点和真实的人类声音。
缺失的个性标记:
如何注入个性:
示例:
AI: "It is important to note that the data suggests significant improvements."
Human: "The data blows me away—these improvements aren't just numbers, they're game-changers."
语气发展指导,请参阅 STYLE.md
人工智能过度使用结构化格式元素,造成机器人般的感觉。
过度使用的模式:
自然的格式化:
为通用内容添加真实的人类个性。
技巧:
之前: "The course provides comprehensive instruction on holistic development methodologies. It is essential for professionals seeking to enhance their skills."
之后: "This course changed how I build software. After 10 years in the industry, I finally understood why my projects kept failing—and how to fix it. If you're serious about shipping better products, take this course."
所做的改变:
在写作中创造自然的节奏和流畅感。
技巧:
之前: "The API is easy to use. It provides comprehensive functionality. Developers can leverage it effectively. The documentation is impressive."
之后: "The API is easy to use. Really easy. While it handles just about everything you need, the beauty is in the simplicity—no complexity for complexity's sake. And the documentation? Actually helpful."
所做的改变:
用自然的替代词替换人工智能偏爱的词语。
技巧:
之前: "We must delve into the intricacies of this comprehensive tapestry to unlock its full potential and orchestrate meaningful outcomes."
之后: "Let's examine how these pieces fit together. When you understand the connections, you can make better decisions."
所做的改变:
注意:人类版本缩短了57%(11个词 vs 19个词)。人工智能的填充增加了不必要的复杂性。
去除僵硬的过渡词,让观点自然流动。
技巧:
之前: "The system is scalable. Furthermore, it is user-friendly. Additionally, it is cost-effective. Therefore, we recommend it for enterprise deployment."
之后: "The system scales effortlessly, remains user-friendly even as it grows, and costs less than competitors. For enterprise deployments, it's the clear choice."
所做的改变:
人工智能版本: "In today's digital landscape, it is important to understand the comprehensive nature of cybersecurity. This multifaceted realm encompasses various critical aspects that organizations must meticulously consider. Moreover, the evolving threat landscape necessitates a holistic approach to safeguarding digital assets."
人类修订版: "Cybersecurity keeps me up at night. Last month, a friend's startup lost everything in a ransomware attack—not because they were careless, but because they missed one basic security setting. That's the scary reality: most breaches aren't sophisticated hacks. They're simple, preventable failures."
改变了什么:
人工智能版本: "Dear Team, I am writing to inform you that the project has reached significant milestones. Furthermore, it is important to note that the collaboration has been exemplary. Consequently, we should leverage this momentum to propel us toward successful completion. Best regards, Alex"
人类修订版: "Hi team, Big news: we hit our major targets ahead of schedule. The way everyone's been working together? Exactly what I hoped for when we started this project. Let's keep this energy up and push through the final stretch. Thanks for all the hard work—Alex"
改变了什么:
人工智能版本: "This API provides comprehensive functionality for data manipulation. It encompasses intricate methods that enable users to harness the full potential of their datasets. The meticulous design ensures optimal performance across various use cases."
人类修订版: "This API handles everything you need to work with data. Filter, sort, transform—whatever you need to do, there's a method for it. We built it to be fast even with large datasets, so you can process millions of records without performance issues."
改变了什么:
专业 ≠ 机器人化。清晰、直接、尊重的语言才是专业的。像 "delve" 和 "tapestry" 这样的词并不专业——它们是故作高深。最受尊敬的写作是简单而真实的。
解决方法: 使用平实的语言。直接说出你的意思。尊重读者的智慧,不要躲在流行语后面。
学术写作比较棘手,因为它遵循的正式惯例与人工智能模式有重叠。然而,学术写作仍然应该是具体的,而不是模糊的。
在学术写作中可以接受的:
在学术写作中应避免的:
专门的学术写作指导,请参阅 ACADEMIC.md
如果你的真实内容被标记,你可能需要添加更多独特的人类元素:
人工智能检测器并不完美。即使检测器标记了,人类审阅者通常也能识别出真实的人类写作。
平衡是关键。过于随意在正式场合可能不合适。过于正式听起来像机器人。
做得过于随意的迹象:
仍然过于正式的迹象:
经验法则: 就像你在向一位你尊重的聪明同事解释一样写作。专业但不做作。清晰但不机器人化。
可以。人工智能可以帮助:
道德使用: 始终添加你自己的声音、例子和视角。人工智能应该辅助,而不是取代你的思考。将人工智能草稿视为需要大量人工修改才能听起来真实的起点。
渐进式披露——当你需要具体指导时深入探讨:
本技能基于对47个来源的人工智能生成内容标记进行的全面研究分析,包括:
完整来源列表和方法论,请参阅 .search-data/ai-content-markers.md 中的研究结果。
记住: 目标不是欺骗检测器或听起来不像人工智能。目标是听起来真实、明确地像人类。用具体的例子、真实的个性和自然的语言来写作。这就是优秀写作一直以来所追求的。
每周安装次数
53
代码仓库
GitHub 星标数
3
首次出现
2026年2月1日
安全审计
安装于
opencode42
gemini-cli39
codex37
github-copilot33
cursor30
kimi-cli30
Expert guidance for creating authentic, human-sounding content that avoids common AI-generated writing patterns. This skill helps you identify and eliminate AI markers in vocabulary, structure, tone, and formatting.
When to use this skill:
Scan any piece of content in under a minute using this rapid checklist:
Search for these top AI red flags:
Count formal transitions:
Look at sentence lengths:
Check for personality:
Assess formatting patterns:
Failed any check? Use the strategies below to fix it.
AI models consistently overuse specific words that rarely appear in human writing. These are the most suspicious.
Top 10 Dead Giveaways:
| AI Word | Use Instead | Example |
|---|---|---|
| delve | examine, explore, study, look into | "We examine the data" not "We delve into the data" |
| tapestry | mix, combination, blend | "A blend of techniques" not "A tapestry of techniques" |
| symphony | combination, working together | "Systems working together" not "A symphony of systems" |
| underscore | highlight, emphasize, show | "This highlights the problem" not "This underscores the problem" |
| meticulous | careful, thorough, detailed | "Careful analysis" not "Meticulous analysis" |
| realm | area, field, space, domain | "In this field" not "In this realm" |
| comprehensive | complete, full, thorough | "A full review" not "A comprehensive review" |
Action Verbs to Avoid: dive, unlock, unleash, harness, leverage, orchestrate, foster, elevate, align, bolster, burgeon, captivate, catalyze, compel, demystify, elucidate
Generic Adjectives to Replace: significant, important, effective, essential, valuable, crucial, noteworthy
For complete vocabulary lists, seeVOCABULARY.md
AI overuses formal transitional phrases, making text feel stiff and academic.
Overused Formal Transitions:
Additive: moreover, furthermore, in addition, additionally, also, likewise Consecutive: consequently, therefore, thus, hence, as a result Summative: in summary, in conclusion, overall, to summarize Introductory: "It's important to note," "It's worth noting that," "Remember that"
Natural Alternatives:
Example:
AI: "The system is efficient. Furthermore, it is user-friendly. Therefore, we recommend it."
Human: "The system is efficient and user-friendly. We recommend it."
For more transition guidance, seeVOCABULARY.md
AI-generated text shows low burstiness (sentence variation) and low perplexity (word unpredictability).
Signs of Low Burstiness:
Quick Fixes for Sentence Variety:
Before (low burstiness): "The system is effective. It is important for users. It helps them work faster. The results are valuable."
After (high burstiness): "This system works. When you need it most, it's there—transforming how users work, making the impossible possible. The results? Game-changing."
For detailed structure guidance, seeSTRUCTURE.md
AI writing lacks personality, opinions, and authentic human voice.
Missing Personality Markers:
How to Inject Voice:
Example:
AI: "It is important to note that the data suggests significant improvements."
Human: "The data blows me away—these improvements aren't just numbers, they're game-changers."
For voice development guidance, seeSTYLE.md
AI overuses structured formatting elements, creating a robotic feel.
Overused Patterns:
Natural Formatting:
Add authentic human personality to generic content.
Technique:
Before: "The course provides comprehensive instruction on holistic development methodologies. It is essential for professionals seeking to enhance their skills."
After: "This course changed how I build software. After 10 years in the industry, I finally understood why my projects kept failing—and how to fix it. If you're serious about shipping better products, take this course."
Changes made:
Create natural rhythm and flow in your writing.
Technique:
Before: "The API is easy to use. It provides comprehensive functionality. Developers can leverage it effectively. The documentation is impressive."
After: "The API is easy to use. Really easy. While it handles just about everything you need, the beauty is in the simplicity—no complexity for complexity's sake. And the documentation? Actually helpful."
Changes made:
Replace AI-favored words with natural alternatives.
Technique:
Before: "We must delve into the intricacies of this comprehensive tapestry to unlock its full potential and orchestrate meaningful outcomes."
After: "Let's examine how these pieces fit together. When you understand the connections, you can make better decisions."
Changes made:
Note: The human version is 57% shorter (11 words vs 19 words). AI padding adds unnecessary complexity.
Remove stiff transitions and let ideas flow.
Technique:
Before: "The system is scalable. Furthermore, it is user-friendly. Additionally, it is cost-effective. Therefore, we recommend it for enterprise deployment."
After: "The system scales effortlessly, remains user-friendly even as it grows, and costs less than competitors. For enterprise deployments, it's the clear choice."
Changes made:
AI Version: "In today's digital landscape, it is important to understand the comprehensive nature of cybersecurity. This multifaceted realm encompasses various critical aspects that organizations must meticulously consider. Moreover, the evolving threat landscape necessitates a holistic approach to safeguarding digital assets."
Human Revision: "Cybersecurity keeps me up at night. Last month, a friend's startup lost everything in a ransomware attack—not because they were careless, but because they missed one basic security setting. That's the scary reality: most breaches aren't sophisticated hacks. They're simple, preventable failures."
What changed:
AI Version: "Dear Team, I am writing to inform you that the project has reached significant milestones. Furthermore, it is important to note that the collaboration has been exemplary. Consequently, we should leverage this momentum to propel us toward successful completion. Best regards, Alex"
Human Revision: "Hi team, Big news: we hit our major targets ahead of schedule. The way everyone's been working together? Exactly what I hoped for when we started this project. Let's keep this energy up and push through the final stretch. Thanks for all the hard work—Alex"
What changed:
AI Version: "This API provides comprehensive functionality for data manipulation. It encompasses intricate methods that enable users to harness the full potential of their datasets. The meticulous design ensures optimal performance across various use cases."
Human Revision: "This API handles everything you need to work with data. Filter, sort, transform—whatever you need to do, there's a method for it. We built it to be fast even with large datasets, so you can process millions of records without performance issues."
What changed:
Professional ≠ robotic. Clear, direct, respectful language is professional. Words like "delve" and "tapestry" aren't professional—they're pretentious. The most respected writing is simple and authentic.
Fix: Use plain language. Say what you mean directly. Respect your reader's intelligence by not hiding behind buzzwords.
Academic writing is tricky because it follows formal conventions that overlap with AI patterns. However, academic writing should still be specific, not vague.
Acceptable in academic writing:
Avoid in academic writing:
For specialized academic guidance, seeACADEMIC.md
If your authentic content was flagged, you may need to add more distinctive human elements:
AI detectors are imperfect. Human reviewers can usually recognize authentic human writing even when detectors flag it.
Balance is key. Too casual can be inappropriate in formal contexts. Too formal sounds robotic.
Signs you went too far casual:
Signs you're still too formal:
Rule of thumb: Write like you're explaining to a smart colleague you respect. Professional but not pretentious. Clear but not robotic.
Yes. AI can help with:
Ethical use: Always add your own voice, examples, and perspective. AI should assist, not replace, your thinking. Treat AI drafts as starting points that require substantial human revision to sound authentic.
Progressive disclosure—dive deeper when you need specific guidance:
This skill is based on comprehensive research analyzing AI-generated content markers from 47 sources including:
See research findings at .search-data/ai-content-markers.md for complete source list and methodology.
Remember: The goal isn't to trick detectors or sound unlike AI. The goal is to sound authentically, unmistakably human. Write with specific examples, genuine personality, and natural language. That's what great writing has always been about.
Weekly Installs
53
Repository
GitHub Stars
3
First Seen
Feb 1, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
opencode42
gemini-cli39
codex37
github-copilot33
cursor30
kimi-cli30
Caveman Compress:AI文件压缩工具,优化Claude输入令牌,提升自然语言处理效率
6,200 周安装
| holistic | complete, full, all-inclusive | "A full approach" not "A holistic approach" |
| intricate | complex, detailed | "Complex details" not "Intricate details" |
| impressively | notably, remarkably, very | "Notably effective" not "Impressively effective" |