重要前提
安装AI Skills的关键前提是:必须科学上网,且开启TUN模式,这一点至关重要,直接决定安装能否顺利完成,在此郑重提醒三遍:科学上网,科学上网,科学上网。查看完整安装教程 →
geo-brand-mentions by zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude
npx skills add https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude --skill geo-brand-mentions品牌提及与AI可见度的相关性大约比传统反向链接强3倍。Ahrefs在2025年12月发布的一项研究,分析了AI搜索平台上75,000个品牌,发现无链接的品牌提及——即提及品牌名称但没有超链接的情况——比域名评级或反向链接数量更能预测AI系统是否会引用和推荐一个品牌。
关键发现:提及出现的平台至关重要。 并非所有提及都是平等的。YouTube或Reddit上的提及对AI引用的重要性远高于低权威博客上的提及,因为AI训练数据和检索系统会不成比例地索引高参与度平台。
这颠覆了传统SEO的一个核心假设。在传统SEO中,来自高DR网站的反向链接是黄金标准。在GEO中,Reddit上的无链接提及或YouTube视频描述可能比来自DR 70博客的dofollow反向链接更有价值。
基于Ahrefs 2025年12月的研究以及Profound(2025年)和Terakeet(2025年)的佐证研究:
为什么YouTube最重要:
检查内容:
YouTube评分(0-100):
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
| 评分 | 标准 |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | 拥有活跃频道,订阅者超过1万,定期上传,品牌在20个以上第三方视频中被提及,出现在行业术语的YouTube搜索结果中 |
| 70-89 | 拥有活跃频道,订阅者超过1千,品牌在10-19个第三方视频中被提及,有一定的YouTube搜索存在感 |
| 50-69 | 频道存在且有一些内容,品牌在5-9个第三方视频中被提及,YouTube搜索存在感有限 |
| 30-49 | 频道存在但不活跃,品牌在1-4个第三方视频中被提及 |
| 10-29 | 没有频道或频道为空,品牌仅在1-2个视频中被提及 |
| 0-9 | 完全没有YouTube存在感 |
为什么Reddit重要:
检查内容:
Reddit评分(0-100):
| 评分 | 标准 |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | 在相关subreddit中频繁被推荐,情感以正面为主,有活跃的官方存在感,拥有自己的subreddit且成员超过5千,出现在行业查询的顶级推荐中 |
| 70-89 | 在相关subreddit中定期被提及,情感大多为正面,有一些官方存在感,出现在多个推荐帖子中 |
| 50-69 | 在几个相关帖子中被提及,情感混杂,社区成员认可品牌名称 |
| 30-49 | 偶尔被提及,仅限于1-2个subreddit,没有官方存在感 |
| 10-29 | 很少被提及,品牌在Reddit上基本不为人知 |
| 0-9 | 没有Reddit存在感 |
为什么Wikipedia重要:
检查内容:
Wikipedia评分(0-100):
| 评分 | 标准 |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | 详细的Wikipedia文章(B级或更高),具有完整属性的Wikidata条目,品牌在多个文章中作为参考文献被引用,创始人有Wikipedia页面 |
| 70-89 | 存在Wikipedia文章(初级或更高),存在Wikidata条目,品牌在2篇以上其他Wikipedia文章中被提及 |
| 50-69 | 存在Wikipedia文章(小作品或初级),基本的Wikidata条目,在其他文章中提及有限 |
| 30-49 | 没有Wikipedia文章但品牌在其他文章中被提及或作为参考文献被引用;可能存在Wikidata条目 |
| 10-29 | 品牌仅在1-2篇Wikipedia文章中作为附带提及 |
| 0-9 | 完全没有Wikipedia或Wikidata存在感 |
为什么LinkedIn重要:
检查内容:
LinkedIn评分(0-100):
| 评分 | 标准 |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | 活跃的公司页面,关注者超过1万,领导层定期发布思想领导力内容,品牌经常被行业专业人士提及,员工资料强大 |
| 70-89 | 活跃的公司页面,关注者超过5千,有一些员工思想领导力内容,偶尔有第三方提及 |
| 50-69 | 存在公司页面,关注者超过1千,发帖不规律,第三方提及有限 |
| 30-49 | 存在公司页面但内容稀疏或不活跃,关注者很少,没有第三方提及 |
| 10-29 | 基本信息的基本公司页面 |
| 0-9 | 没有LinkedIn公司页面 |
这些平台与AI可见度的相关性较低,但仍然有意义:
| 平台 | 权重 | 理由 |
|---|---|---|
| YouTube存在感 | 25% | 与AI引用的相关性最强(0.737) |
| Reddit存在感 | 25% | 第二强的相关性;对产品推荐至关重要 |
| Wikipedia / Wikidata | 20% | 实体识别基础;AI训练数据基石 |
| LinkedIn权威 | 15% | 专业权威信号;B2B相关性 |
| 其他平台 | 15% | 来自Quora、GitHub、新闻、论坛、播客的补充信号 |
公式:
Brand_Authority_Score = (YouTube * 0.25) + (Reddit * 0.25) + (Wikipedia * 0.20) + (LinkedIn * 0.15) + (Other * 0.15)
| 分数范围 | 评级 | 解读 |
|---|---|---|
| 85-100 | 主导 | 品牌在AI平台上广为人知。极有可能被AI系统引用和推荐。 |
| 70-84 | 强大 | 品牌在跨平台上有稳固的存在感。AI系统很可能识别并在相关查询中引用它。 |
| 50-69 | 中等 | 品牌在某些平台上有存在感,但存在差距。AI引用不一致。 |
| 30-49 | 薄弱 | 品牌平台存在感有限。AI系统可能不会将其识别为独特实体。 |
| 0-29 | 最小 | 品牌平台存在感可忽略不计。AI系统不太可能引用或推荐它。 |
从用户或网站收集以下信息:
对于每个平台,使用WebFetch搜索和评估存在感:
YouTube检查:
[品牌名称] site:youtube.comyoutube.com/@[品牌名称] 或 youtube.com/c/[品牌名称] 查找官方频道"[品牌名称]" site:youtube.com(在描述中精确匹配提及)Reddit检查:
[品牌名称] site:reddit.com"[品牌名称]" site:reddit.com(精确匹配)reddit.com/r/[品牌名称] 查找官方subredditreddit.com/user/[品牌名称] 查找官方账户Wikipedia检查(重要 — 使用两种方法以避免假阴性):
方法1 — Python API检查(最可靠,首先执行此操作):
python3 -c "
import requests, json
from urllib.parse import quote_plus
brand = '[Brand_Name]'
# Check Wikipedia API directly
api_url = f'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=search&srsearch={quote_plus(brand)}&format=json'
r = requests.get(api_url, headers={'User-Agent': 'GEO-Audit/1.0'}, timeout=15)
data = r.json()
results = data.get('query', {}).get('search', [])
if results and brand.lower() in results[0].get('title', '').lower():
print(f'WIKIPEDIA PAGE EXISTS: {results[0][\"title\"]}')
print(f'URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/{results[0][\"title\"].replace(\" \", \"_\")}')
else:
print('No direct Wikipedia page found')
# Check Wikidata
wd_url = f'https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbsearchentities&search={quote_plus(brand)}&language=en&format=json'
r2 = requests.get(wd_url, headers={'User-Agent': 'GEO-Audit/1.0'}, timeout=15)
wd = r2.json()
entities = wd.get('search', [])
if entities:
print(f'WIKIDATA ENTRY: {entities[0].get(\"id\", \"\")} — {entities[0].get(\"description\", \"\")}')
"
方法2 — 直接URL检查(备份验证):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/[品牌名称] — 检查页面是否加载(不是重定向到搜索)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/[创始人姓名] 查找创始人文章方法3 — 搜索(最不可靠,仅用于补充信息):
[品牌名称] site:wikipedia.org[品牌名称] site:wikidata.org关键: 仅靠网络搜索来确定Wikipedia存在感是不可靠的。始终首先运行Python API检查。如果API说页面存在,它就存在——不要用未能找到它的搜索结果来覆盖此判断。
LinkedIn检查:
[品牌名称] site:linkedin.comlinkedin.com/company/[品牌名称] 查找公司页面其他平台:
[品牌名称] site:quora.com[品牌名称] site:stackoverflow.com(如果是技术品牌)[品牌名称] site:github.com(如果是技术品牌)[品牌名称] site:news.ycombinator.com(Hacker News)"[品牌名称]" 广泛搜索新闻提及(筛选最近6个月)对于Reddit和其他讨论平台,通过分析最近和最突出的提及来评估情感:
| 情感 | 指标 |
|---|---|
| 正面 | 推荐(“我喜欢[品牌]”、“我们换成了[品牌]并且...”、“强烈推荐”),被点赞的提及,与竞争对手的正面比较 |
| 中性 | 事实性提及(“我们使用[品牌]来...”、“[品牌]提供...”),关于品牌的问题,平衡的比较 |
| 负面 | 投诉(“避免[品牌]”、“[品牌]支持很差”),被点踩的推荐,负面比较 |
| 混合 | 正面和负面的结合。注意比例和主要主题。 |
如果确定了竞争对手,快速扫描他们的平台存在感以获取背景信息。这有助于校准分数——在一个竞争对手没有Reddit存在感的行业中,拥有“中等”Reddit存在感的品牌相对较强。
生成一个名为 GEO-BRAND-MENTIONS.md 的文件:
# 品牌权威报告:[品牌名称]
**分析日期:**[日期]
**品牌:**[品牌名称]
**域名:**[URL]
**行业:**[行业]
---
## 品牌权威评分:[X]/100 ([评级])
### 平台细分
| 平台 | 分数 | 权重 | 加权分数 | 状态 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YouTube | [X]/100 | 25% | [X] | [活跃频道 / 被提及 / 缺失] |
| Reddit | [X]/100 | 25% | [X] | [活跃 / 被讨论 / 缺失] |
| Wikipedia | [X]/100 | 20% | [X] | [有文章 / 被提及 / 缺失] |
| LinkedIn | [X]/100 | 15% | [X] | [活跃 / 基础 / 缺失] |
| 其他平台 | [X]/100 | 15% | [X] | [摘要] |
| **总计** | | | **[X]/100** | |
---
## 平台详情
### YouTube ([X]/100)
**官方频道:**[是/否] | [如果存在,URL]
**订阅者:**[数量或N/A]
**视频:**[数量或N/A]
**最后上传:**[日期或N/A]
**第三方提及:**[估计数量]
**关键发现:**
- [发现1]
- [发现2]
### Reddit ([X]/100)
**官方账户:**[是/否] | [如果存在,URL]
**自有Subreddit:**[是/否] | [如果存在,URL和成员数量]
**提及量:**[估计帖子数量]
**主要Subreddit:**[品牌被讨论的subreddit列表]
**情感:**[正面/负面/中性/混合]
**关键发现:**
- [发现1]
- [发现2]
### Wikipedia ([X]/100)
**公司文章:**[是/否] | [如果存在,URL]
**创始人文章:**[是/否] | [如果存在,URL]
**Wikidata条目:**[是/否] | [如果存在,Q编号]
**在其他文章中被引用:**[是/否] | [哪些文章]
**关键发现:**
- [发现1]
- [发现2]
### LinkedIn ([X]/100)
**公司页面:**[是/否] | [如果存在,URL]
**关注者:**[数量或N/A]
**发帖频率:**[每周/每月/很少/从不]
**关键发现:**
- [发现1]
- [发现2]
### 其他平台 ([X]/100)
| 平台 | 存在感 | 备注 |
|---|---|---|
| Quora | [是/否] | [简要说明] |
| Stack Overflow | [是/否] | [简要说明] |
| GitHub | [是/否] | [简要说明] |
| Hacker News | [是/否] | [简要说明] |
| 新闻/媒体报道 | [是/否] | [简要说明] |
| 播客 | [是/否] | [简要说明] |
---
## 建议
### 立即行动(第1-2周)
1. **[平台]:**[要采取的具体行动及预期影响]
2. **[平台]:**[具体行动]
### 短期策略(第1-3个月)
1. **[平台]:**[包含策略和战术的策略]
2. **[平台]:**[包含策略和战术的策略]
### 长期权威建设(第3-12个月)
1. **[平台]:**[长期策略]
2. **[平台]:**[长期策略]
---
## 竞争背景
[如果分析了竞争对手,显示简要比较表]
| 品牌 | YouTube | Reddit | Wikipedia | LinkedIn | 其他 | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [目标品牌] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |
| [竞争对手1] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |
| [竞争对手2] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |
## 关键要点
[1-2句话总结品牌的AI可见度状况以及最具影响力的单一行动]
| 信号 | 与AI引用的相关性 | 传统SEO价值 |
|---|---|---|
| YouTube提及 | ~0.737 | 低(不是排名因素) |
| Reddit提及 | 高(未公布确切系数) | 低 |
| Wikipedia存在感 | 高 | 中等(信任信号) |
| LinkedIn存在感 | 中等 | 低 |
| 域名评级 | ~0.266 | 非常高 |
| 反向链接数量 | ~0.266 | 非常高 |
| 自然流量 | 中等 | 非常高 |
关键洞察: 对AI可见度最重要的信号(YouTube、Reddit)在传统SEO中几乎无关紧要,而对传统SEO最重要的信号(反向链接、DR)是AI可见度的弱预测因子。这需要根本不同的优化策略。
YouTube快速见效方法:
Reddit快速见效方法:
Wikipedia策略:
LinkedIn快速见效方法:
每周安装量
68
仓库
GitHub星标
3.8K
首次出现
2026年2月27日
安全审计
安装于
codex67
opencode67
kimi-cli65
gemini-cli65
amp65
cline65
Brand mentions correlate approximately 3x more strongly with AI visibility than traditional backlinks. An Ahrefs study published in December 2025, analyzing 75,000 brands across AI search platforms, found that unlinked brand mentions -- references to a brand name without a hyperlink -- are a stronger predictor of whether AI systems cite and recommend a brand than Domain Rating or backlink count.
The critical finding: the platform where the mention appears matters enormously. Not all mentions are equal. A mention on YouTube or Reddit carries far more weight for AI citation than a mention on a low-authority blog, because AI training data and retrieval systems disproportionately index high-engagement platforms.
This inverts a core assumption of traditional SEO. In traditional SEO, a backlink from a high-DR site is the gold standard. In GEO, an unlinked mention on Reddit or a YouTube video description may be more valuable than a dofollow backlink from a DR 70 blog.
Based on the Ahrefs December 2025 study and corroborating research from Profound (2025) and Terakeet (2025):
Why YouTube matters most:
What to check:
Scoring for YouTube (0-100):
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | Active channel with 10K+ subscribers, regular uploads, brand mentioned in 20+ third-party videos, appears in YouTube search results for industry terms |
| 70-89 | Active channel with 1K+ subscribers, brand mentioned in 10-19 third-party videos, some YouTube search presence |
| 50-69 | Channel exists with some content, brand mentioned in 5-9 third-party videos, limited YouTube search presence |
| 30-49 | Channel exists but inactive, brand mentioned in 1-4 third-party videos |
| 10-29 | No channel or empty channel, brand mentioned in 1-2 videos only |
| 0-9 | No YouTube presence whatsoever |
Why Reddit matters:
What to check:
Scoring for Reddit (0-100):
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | Frequently recommended in relevant subreddits, predominantly positive sentiment, active official presence, own subreddit with 5K+ members, appears in top recommendations for industry queries |
| 70-89 | Regularly mentioned in relevant subreddits, mostly positive sentiment, some official presence, appears in multiple recommendation threads |
| 50-69 | Mentioned in several relevant threads, mixed sentiment, brand name is recognized by community members |
| 30-49 | Occasional mentions, limited to 1-2 subreddits, no official presence |
| 10-29 | Rare mentions, brand largely unknown on Reddit |
| 0-9 | No Reddit presence |
Why Wikipedia matters:
What to check:
Scoring for Wikipedia (0-100):
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | Detailed Wikipedia article (B-class or higher), Wikidata entry with complete properties, brand cited as reference in multiple articles, founder has Wikipedia page |
| 70-89 | Wikipedia article exists (start-class or higher), Wikidata entry exists, brand mentioned in 2+ other Wikipedia articles |
| 50-69 | Wikipedia article exists (stub or start), basic Wikidata entry, limited mentions in other articles |
| 30-49 | No Wikipedia article but brand is mentioned in other articles or cited as reference; Wikidata entry may exist |
| 10-29 | Brand mentioned in 1-2 Wikipedia articles as a passing reference only |
| 0-9 | No Wikipedia or Wikidata presence of any kind |
Why LinkedIn matters:
What to check:
Scoring for LinkedIn (0-100):
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | Active company page with 10K+ followers, leadership regularly posts thought leadership, brand frequently mentioned by industry professionals, strong employee profiles |
| 70-89 | Active company page with 5K+ followers, some employee thought leadership, occasional third-party mentions |
| 50-69 | Company page exists with 1K+ followers, irregular posting, limited third-party mentions |
| 30-49 | Company page exists but is sparse or inactive, few followers, no third-party mentions |
| 10-29 | Basic company page with minimal information |
| 0-9 | No LinkedIn company page |
These platforms have lower but still meaningful correlation with AI visibility:
| Platform | Weight | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| YouTube Presence | 25% | Strongest correlation with AI citation (0.737) |
| Reddit Presence | 25% | Second strongest correlation; critical for product recommendations |
| Wikipedia / Wikidata | 20% | Entity recognition foundation; AI training data cornerstone |
| LinkedIn Authority | 15% | Professional authority signals; B2B relevance |
| Other Platforms | 15% | Supplementary signals from Quora, GitHub, news, forums, podcasts |
Formula:
Brand_Authority_Score = (YouTube * 0.25) + (Reddit * 0.25) + (Wikipedia * 0.20) + (LinkedIn * 0.15) + (Other * 0.15)
| Score Range | Rating | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 85-100 | Dominant | Brand is a well-recognized entity across AI platforms. Highly likely to be cited and recommended by AI systems. |
| 70-84 | Strong | Brand has solid cross-platform presence. AI systems likely recognize and cite it for relevant queries. |
| 50-69 | Moderate | Brand has presence on some platforms but gaps exist. AI citation is inconsistent. |
| 30-49 | Weak | Brand has limited platform presence. AI systems may not recognize it as a distinct entity. |
| 0-29 | Minimal | Brand has negligible platform presence. AI systems are unlikely to cite or recommend it. |
Gather the following from the user or from the website:
For each platform, use WebFetch to search and assess presence:
YouTube Check:
[brand name] site:youtube.comyoutube.com/@[brand-name] or youtube.com/c/[brand-name] for official channel"[brand name]" site:youtube.com (exact match for mentions in descriptions)Reddit Check:
[brand name] site:reddit.com"[brand name]" site:reddit.com (exact match)reddit.com/r/[brand-name] for official subredditreddit.com/user/[brand-name] for official accountWikipedia Check (IMPORTANT — use BOTH methods to avoid false negatives):
Method 1 — Python API check (MOST RELIABLE, do this FIRST):
python3 -c "
import requests, json
from urllib.parse import quote_plus
brand = '[Brand_Name]'
# Check Wikipedia API directly
api_url = f'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=search&srsearch={quote_plus(brand)}&format=json'
r = requests.get(api_url, headers={'User-Agent': 'GEO-Audit/1.0'}, timeout=15)
data = r.json()
results = data.get('query', {}).get('search', [])
if results and brand.lower() in results[0].get('title', '').lower():
print(f'WIKIPEDIA PAGE EXISTS: {results[0][\"title\"]}')
print(f'URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/{results[0][\"title\"].replace(\" \", \"_\")}')
else:
print('No direct Wikipedia page found')
# Check Wikidata
wd_url = f'https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbsearchentities&search={quote_plus(brand)}&language=en&format=json'
r2 = requests.get(wd_url, headers={'User-Agent': 'GEO-Audit/1.0'}, timeout=15)
wd = r2.json()
entities = wd.get('search', [])
if entities:
print(f'WIKIDATA ENTRY: {entities[0].get(\"id\", \"\")} — {entities[0].get(\"description\", \"\")}')
"
Method 2 — Direct URL check (backup verification):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/[Brand_Name] — check if the page loads (not a redirect to search)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/[Founder_Name] for founder articleMethod 3 — Search (least reliable, use only for supplemental info):
[brand name] site:wikipedia.org[brand name] site:wikidata.orgCRITICAL: Web search alone is NOT reliable for determining Wikipedia presence. ALWAYS run the Python API check first. If the API says a page exists, it exists — do not override this with a search result that fails to find it.
LinkedIn Check:
[brand name] site:linkedin.comlinkedin.com/company/[brand-name] for company pageOther Platforms:
[brand name] site:quora.com[brand name] site:stackoverflow.com (if technical brand)[brand name] site:github.com (if technical brand)[brand name] site:news.ycombinator.com (Hacker News)"[brand name]" broadly for news mentions (filter to last 6 months)For Reddit and other discussion platforms, assess sentiment by analyzing the most recent and most prominent mentions:
| Sentiment | Indicators |
|---|---|
| Positive | Recommendations ("I love [brand]," "We switched to [brand] and...", "Highly recommend"), upvoted mentions, positive comparison against competitors |
| Neutral | Factual mentions ("We use [brand] for...", "[Brand] offers..."), questions about the brand, balanced comparisons |
| Negative | Complaints ("Avoid [brand]", "[Brand] has terrible support"), downvoted recommendations, negative comparisons |
| Mixed | Combination of positive and negative. Note the ratio and primary themes. |
If competitors are identified, do a quick scan of their platform presence for context. This helps calibrate the score -- a brand with "moderate" Reddit presence in an industry where competitors have zero Reddit presence is relatively strong.
Generate a file called GEO-BRAND-MENTIONS.md:
# Brand Authority Report: [Brand Name]
**Analysis Date:** [Date]
**Brand:** [Brand Name]
**Domain:** [URL]
**Industry:** [Industry]
---
## Brand Authority Score: [X]/100 ([Rating])
### Platform Breakdown
| Platform | Score | Weight | Weighted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YouTube | [X]/100 | 25% | [X] | [Active Channel / Mentioned / Absent] |
| Reddit | [X]/100 | 25% | [X] | [Active / Discussed / Absent] |
| Wikipedia | [X]/100 | 20% | [X] | [Article / Mentioned / Absent] |
| LinkedIn | [X]/100 | 15% | [X] | [Active / Basic / Absent] |
| Other Platforms | [X]/100 | 15% | [X] | [Summary] |
| **Total** | | | **[X]/100** | |
---
## Platform Detail
### YouTube ([X]/100)
**Official Channel:** [Yes/No] | [URL if exists]
**Subscribers:** [Count or N/A]
**Videos:** [Count or N/A]
**Last Upload:** [Date or N/A]
**Third-Party Mentions:** [Estimated count]
**Key Findings:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
### Reddit ([X]/100)
**Official Account:** [Yes/No] | [URL if exists]
**Own Subreddit:** [Yes/No] | [URL and member count if exists]
**Mention Volume:** [Estimated thread count]
**Primary Subreddits:** [List of subreddits where brand is discussed]
**Sentiment:** [Positive/Negative/Neutral/Mixed]
**Key Findings:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
### Wikipedia ([X]/100)
**Company Article:** [Yes/No] | [URL if exists]
**Founder Article:** [Yes/No] | [URL if exists]
**Wikidata Entry:** [Yes/No] | [Q-number if exists]
**Cited in Other Articles:** [Yes/No] | [Which articles]
**Key Findings:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
### LinkedIn ([X]/100)
**Company Page:** [Yes/No] | [URL if exists]
**Followers:** [Count or N/A]
**Post Frequency:** [Weekly/Monthly/Rare/Never]
**Key Findings:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
### Other Platforms ([X]/100)
| Platform | Presence | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Quora | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |
| Stack Overflow | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |
| GitHub | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |
| Hacker News | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |
| News/Press | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |
| Podcasts | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |
---
## Recommendations
### Immediate Actions (Week 1-2)
1. **[Platform]:** [Specific action to take with expected impact]
2. **[Platform]:** [Specific action]
### Short-Term Strategy (Month 1-3)
1. **[Platform]:** [Strategy with tactics]
2. **[Platform]:** [Strategy with tactics]
### Long-Term Authority Building (Month 3-12)
1. **[Platform]:** [Long-term strategy]
2. **[Platform]:** [Long-term strategy]
---
## Competitive Context
[If competitors were analyzed, show a brief comparison table]
| Brand | YouTube | Reddit | Wikipedia | LinkedIn | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Subject Brand] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |
| [Competitor 1] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |
| [Competitor 2] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |
## Key Takeaway
[1-2 sentence summary of the brand's AI visibility standing and the single most impactful action to take]
| Signal | Correlation with AI Citation | Traditional SEO Value |
|---|---|---|
| YouTube mentions | ~0.737 | Low (not a ranking factor) |
| Reddit mentions | High (exact coefficient not published) | Low |
| Wikipedia presence | High | Moderate (trust signal) |
| LinkedIn presence | Moderate | Low |
| Domain Rating | ~0.266 | Very High |
| Backlink count | ~0.266 | Very High |
| Organic traffic | Moderate | Very High |
Key insight: The signals that matter most for AI visibility (YouTube, Reddit) are almost irrelevant in traditional SEO, and the signals that matter most for traditional SEO (backlinks, DR) are weak predictors of AI visibility. This requires a fundamentally different optimization strategy.
YouTube Quick Wins:
Reddit Quick Wins:
Wikipedia Strategy:
LinkedIn Quick Wins:
Weekly Installs
68
Repository
GitHub Stars
3.8K
First Seen
Feb 27, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubWarnSocketPassSnykWarn
Installed on
codex67
opencode67
kimi-cli65
gemini-cli65
amp65
cline65
专业SEO审计工具:全面网站诊断、技术SEO优化与页面分析指南
72,700 周安装
URL短链生成器 - 创建SEO友好URL的最佳实践与工具指南
376 周安装
Claude项目工作流技能:9个命令自动化项目生命周期,节省35-55分钟
365 周安装
FAQ页面生成器:优化SEO、提升转化率、触发富媒体结果(PAA/精选摘要)的完整指南
381 周安装
Hugging Face Datasets 技能:数据集管理、SQL查询与多格式支持工具
366 周安装
Apollo Kotlin:Android与JVM的强类型GraphQL客户端,支持Kotlin多平台
373 周安装
数学计算与符号计算工具:SymPy、Z3、Pint统一入口,支持方程求解、证明、单位转换
374 周安装