重要前提
安装AI Skills的关键前提是:必须科学上网,且开启TUN模式,这一点至关重要,直接决定安装能否顺利完成,在此郑重提醒三遍:科学上网,科学上网,科学上网。查看完整安装教程 →
discussion-intelligence by qodex-ai/ai-agent-skills
npx skills add https://github.com/qodex-ai/ai-agent-skills --skill discussion-intelligence此技能可将您的会议转录稿转化为关于您沟通模式的可操作洞察,帮助您成为更高效的沟通者和领导者。
~/meetings/)Analyze all meetings in this folder and tell me when I avoided conflict.
Look at my meetings from the past month and identify my communication patterns.
Compare my facilitation style between these two meeting folders.
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
Analyze all transcripts in this folder and:
1. Identify when I interrupted others
2. Calculate my speaking ratio
3. Find moments I avoided giving direct feedback
4. Track my use of filler words
5. Show examples of good active listening
当用户请求会议分析时:
**冲突回避**:
* 寻找模糊语言("maybe", "kind of", "I think")
* 间接措辞而非直接请求
* 紧张时转换话题
* 无承诺的同意("yeah, but...")
* 未解决明显问题
**发言比例**:
* 计算发言占会议时间的百分比
* 统计打断次数(用户打断他人和被他人打断)
* 测量平均发言轮次长度
* 跟踪提问与陈述的比例
**填充词**:
* 统计 "um", "uh", "like", "you know", "actually" 等
* 注意每分钟或每个发言轮次的频率
* 识别填充词增加的情况(紧张、不确定时)
**积极倾听**:
* 引用他人先前观点的提问
* 转述或总结他人的想法
* 在他人的贡献基础上进行构建
* 提出澄清性问题
**领导力与引导**:
* 决策方法(指令型 vs. 协作型)
* 如何处理分歧
* 是否包含较安静的参与者
* 时间管理和议程控制
* 后续行动和行动项的清晰度
4. 提供具体示例 对于发现的每个模式,包含:
### [模式名称]
**发现**:[关于该模式的一句话总结]
**频率**:[在 Y 次会议中出现 X 次]
**示例**:
1. **[会议名称/日期]** - [时间戳]
**发生了什么**:
> [来自转录稿的实际引用]
**为何重要**:
[对影响或错失机会的解释]
**更好的方法**:
[具体的替代措辞或行为]
[为 2-3 个最显著的示例重复此结构]
5. 综合洞察 在分析完所有模式后,提供:
# 会议洞察总结
**分析周期**:[日期范围]
**分析的会议**:[X 次会议]
**总时长**:[X 小时]
## 识别的关键模式
### 1. [主要模式]
- **观察到的**:[您看到的情况]
- **影响**:[为何重要]
- **建议**:[如何改进]
### 2. [次要模式]
[相同结构]
## 沟通优势
1. [优势 1 及示例]
2. [优势 2 及示例]
3. [优势 3 及示例]
## 成长机会
1. **[领域 1]**:[具体、可操作的建议]
2. **[领域 2]**:[具体、可操作的建议]
3. **[领域 3]**:[具体、可操作的建议]
## 发言统计
- 平均发言时间:[占会议的 X%]
- 提问次数:[平均每次会议 X 次]
- 填充词:[每分钟 X 次]
- 打断次数:[平均每次会议打断他人 X 次 / 被他人打断 Y 次]
## 后续步骤
[3-5 个改进沟通的具体行动]
6. 提供后续选项 * 在未来的会议中跟踪这些相同的指标 * 深入分析特定会议或模式 * 与行业基准进行比较 * 创建个人沟通发展计划 * 为绩效评估生成总结
用户:"我下载了所有会议录音并放入一个文件夹。告诉我所有我微妙回避冲突的时刻。"
输出:
# 冲突回避模式
在 15 次会议中发现了 23 个您使用间接沟通或避免直接解决紧张局势的实例。
## 模式:对关键反馈使用模糊语言
**频率**:在 7 次会议中出现 8 次
**示例 1:与 Sarah 的一对一会议** - 00:14:32
**发生了什么**:
> "所以,我在想... 也许我们可以,比如,可能考虑再看一下时间线?我的意思是,如果你觉得这有道理的话。但你觉得怎么最好就怎么做!"
**为何重要**:
您需要指出 Sarah 的项目进度落后,但模糊语言("maybe", "potentially", "if you think")以及最后的推脱("whatever you think")让她很容易忽略了紧迫性。
**更好的方法**:
"Sarah,这个项目比计划晚了两周。我们需要今天讨论是什么阻碍了进展,并制定一个新的时间线。"
[更多示例...]
## 建议
1. **在第一句话中直接点明问题**
2. **移除模糊词语**,如 "maybe," "kind of," "sort of"
3. **提出具体问题**,而不是暗示
4. **安排困难对话**,而不是随意提起
用户:"分析我的团队会议,告诉我关于我的引导风格。"
输出:提供关于以下方面的洞察:
用户:"比较我第一季度和第二季度的会议,看看我的倾听技巧是否有所提高。"
输出:创建一个比较分析,显示:
来自 Granola(订阅 Lenny 的新闻通讯免费获得):
来自 Zoom:
来自 Google Meet:
来自 Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai 等:
YYYY-MM-DD - 会议名称.txt 格式每周安装次数
56
仓库
GitHub 星标数
5
首次出现
2026年1月22日
安全审计
安装于
opencode43
gemini-cli42
codex41
github-copilot39
cursor38
claude-code38
This skill transforms your meeting transcripts into actionable insights about your communication patterns, helping you become a more effective communicator and leader.
Pattern Recognition : Identifies recurring behaviors across meetings like:
Communication Analysis : Evaluates communication effectiveness:
Actionable Feedback : Provides specific, timestamped examples with:
Trend Tracking : Compares patterns over time when analyzing multiple meetings
~/meetings/)Analyze all meetings in this folder and tell me when I avoided conflict.
Look at my meetings from the past month and identify my communication patterns.
Compare my facilitation style between these two meeting folders.
Analyze all transcripts in this folder and:
1. Identify when I interrupted others
2. Calculate my speaking ratio
3. Find moments I avoided giving direct feedback
4. Track my use of filler words
5. Show examples of good active listening
When a user requests meeting analysis:
Discover Available Data
Clarify Analysis Goals
If not specified, ask what they want to learn:
* Specific behaviors (conflict avoidance, interruptions, filler words)
* Communication effectiveness (clarity, directness, listening)
* Meeting facilitation skills
* Speaking patterns and ratios
* Growth areas for improvement
3. Analyze Patterns
For each requested insight:
Conflict Avoidance :
* Look for hedging language ("maybe", "kind of", "I think")
* Indirect phrasing instead of direct requests
* Changing subject when tension arises
* Agreeing without commitment ("yeah, but...")
* Not addressing obvious problems
Speaking Ratios :
* Calculate percentage of meeting spent speaking
* Count interruptions (by and of the user)
* Measure average speaking turn length
* Track question vs. statement ratios
Filler Words :
* Count "um", "uh", "like", "you know", "actually", etc.
* Note frequency per minute or per speaking turn
* Identify situations where they increase (nervous, uncertain)
Active Listening :
* Questions that reference others' previous points
* Paraphrasing or summarizing others' ideas
* Building on others' contributions
* Asking clarifying questions
Leadership & Facilitation:
* Decision-making approach (directive vs. collaborative)
* How disagreements are handled
* Inclusion of quieter participants
* Time management and agenda control
* Follow-up and action item clarity
4. Provide Specific Examples
For each pattern found, include:
### [Pattern Name]
**Finding**: [One-sentence summary of the pattern]
**Frequency**: [X times across Y meetings]
**Examples**:
1. **[Meeting Name/Date]** - [Timestamp]
**What Happened**:
> [Actual quote from transcript]
**Why This Matters**:
[Explanation of the impact or missed opportunity]
**Better Approach**:
[Specific alternative phrasing or behavior]
[Repeat for 2-3 strongest examples]
5. Synthesize Insights
After analyzing all patterns, provide:
# Meeting Insights Summary
**Analysis Period**: [Date range]
**Meetings Analyzed**: [X meetings]
**Total Duration**: [X hours]
## Key Patterns Identified
### 1. [Primary Pattern]
- **Observed**: [What you saw]
- **Impact**: [Why it matters]
- **Recommendation**: [How to improve]
### 2. [Second Pattern]
[Same structure]
## Communication Strengths
1. [Strength 1 with example]
2. [Strength 2 with example]
3. [Strength 3 with example]
## Growth Opportunities
1. **[Area 1]**: [Specific, actionable advice]
2. **[Area 2]**: [Specific, actionable advice]
3. **[Area 3]**: [Specific, actionable advice]
## Speaking Statistics
- Average speaking time: [X% of meeting]
- Questions asked: [X per meeting average]
- Filler words: [X per minute]
- Interruptions: [X given / Y received per meeting]
## Next Steps
[3-5 concrete actions to improve communication]
6. Offer Follow-Up Options
* Track these same metrics in future meetings
* Deep dive into specific meetings or patterns
* Compare to industry benchmarks
* Create a personal communication development plan
* Generate a summary for performance reviews
User : "I download all of my meeting recordings and put them in a folder. Tell me all the times I've subtly avoided conflict."
Output :
# Conflict Avoidance Patterns
Found 23 instances across 15 meetings where you used indirect
communication or avoided addressing tensions directly.
## Pattern: Hedging on Critical Feedback
**Frequency**: 8 times across 7 meetings
**Example 1: 1:1 with Sarah** - 00:14:32
**What Happened**:
> "So, I was thinking... maybe we could, like, potentially
> consider looking at the timeline again? I mean, if you
> think that makes sense. But whatever you think is best!"
**Why This Matters**:
You needed to address that Sarah's project was behind schedule,
but the hedging language ("maybe", "potentially", "if you think")
and the deflection at the end ("whatever you think") made it easy
for her to miss the urgency.
**Better Approach**:
"Sarah, the project is two weeks behind schedule. We need to
discuss what's blocking progress and create a new timeline
today."
[Additional examples...]
## Recommendations
1. **Name the issue directly** in the first sentence
2. **Remove hedging words** like "maybe," "kind of," "sort of"
3. **Ask specific questions** instead of hinting
4. **Schedule difficult conversations** instead of raising them casually
User : "Analyze my team meetings and tell me about my facilitation style."
Output : Provides insights on:
User : "Compare my meetings from Q1 vs. Q2 to see if I've improved my listening skills."
Output : Creates a comparative analysis showing:
From Granola (free with Lenny's newsletter subscription):
From Zoom :
From Google Meet :
From Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai, etc. :
YYYY-MM-DD - Meeting Name.txt formatWeekly Installs
56
Repository
GitHub Stars
5
First Seen
Jan 22, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
opencode43
gemini-cli42
codex41
github-copilot39
cursor38
claude-code38
超能力技能使用指南:AI助手技能调用优先级与工作流程详解
55,300 周安装