重要前提
安装AI Skills的关键前提是:必须科学上网,且开启TUN模式,这一点至关重要,直接决定安装能否顺利完成,在此郑重提醒三遍:科学上网,科学上网,科学上网。查看完整安装教程 →
sales-negotiation by dengineproblem/agents-monorepo
npx skills add https://github.com/dengineproblem/agents-monorepo --skill sales-negotiation精通谈判策略、采购流程导航和成交技巧。
core_concepts:
batna:
definition: "Best Alternative To Negotiated Agreement"
importance: "你的离场权力"
develop:
- "识别所有替代方案"
- "评估每个选项"
- "强化最佳替代方案"
- "知道何时离场"
zopa:
definition: "Zone of Possible Agreement"
components:
seller_walk_away: "最低可接受价格"
buyer_walk_away: "最高愿意支付价格"
zone: "两者之间的重叠区域"
visualization: |
Seller min ----[====ZOPA====]---- Buyer max
^ ^
Ideal outcome zone
anchoring:
definition: "First number sets the range"
tactics:
- "销售时锚定高价"
- "应对极端锚定"
- "使用市场数据来证明"
concession_strategy:
rules:
- "绝不无偿让步"
- "让步幅度随时间递减"
- "交换价值不等的项目"
- "标明你的让步"
negotiation_prep:
know_yourself:
- "你的 BATNA(离场替代方案)"
- "你的目标结果"
- "你的保留价格"
- "你可以提供的让步"
- "不可谈判项"
know_them:
- "他们可能的 BATNA"
- "他们的限制(预算、时间线)"
- "他们的决策标准"
- "谁有决策权"
- "个人动机"
know_the_deal:
- "市场费率/基准"
- "竞争格局"
- "总价值(不仅仅是价格)"
- "实施成本"
- "长期影响"
preparation_checklist:
before_meeting:
- "[ ] 研究公司财务状况"
- "[ ] 了解采购流程"
- "[ ] 映射所有利益相关者"
- "[ ] 准备价值论证"
- "[ ] 规划让步顺序"
- "[ ] 演练困难场景"
- "[ ] 设定目标和离场点"
广告位招租
在这里展示您的产品或服务
触达数万 AI 开发者,精准高效
objection_framework:
acknowledge_explore_respond:
acknowledge: "表明你已听到并理解"
explore: "深入挖掘以找到真正的异议"
respond: "解决根本原因"
common_objections:
price_too_high:
reframe: "我们来讨论相对于投资的价值"
questions:
- "与什么相比?"
- "不解决这个问题的成本是什么?"
- "什么样的投资回报率能证明这项投资是合理的?"
tactics:
- "分解为每用户/每月成本"
- "展示竞争对比"
- "量化业务影响"
- "提供付款条件"
we_have_budget_constraints:
reframe: "让我们在您的限制内找到一个解决方案"
questions:
- "您的预算范围是多少?"
- "我们可以调整什么来适应?"
- "预算可以从其他地方转移吗?"
tactics:
- "分阶段实施"
- "开始时缩减范围"
- "不同的付款结构"
- "推迟到下一个财年"
need_to_think_about_it:
reframe: "当然。请帮我理解您在权衡什么"
questions:
- "具体哪些方面需要更多考虑?"
- "什么能帮助您做出决定?"
- "您的决策时间线是怎样的?"
tactics:
- "提议现在就解决顾虑"
- "安排后续电话"
- "发送相关材料"
- "识别真正的异议"
using_competitor:
reframe: "许多客户是从他们那里转过来的。介意我问一下您为什么选择他们吗?"
questions:
- "哪些方面运作良好?"
- "哪些方面可以更好?"
- "您的续约时间是什么时候?"
tactics:
- "突出差异化优势"
- "分享转换案例研究"
- "提议并行试用"
- "为续约埋下种子"
not_the_right_time:
reframe: "什么时候会更好,为什么?"
questions:
- "现在发生了什么?"
- "需要改变什么?"
- "等待的成本是什么?"
tactics:
- "创造紧迫感"
- "展示延迟的风险"
- "提议从小处着手"
- "预订未来的跟进"
need_approval:
reframe: "有道理。我如何帮助您进行论证?"
questions:
- "[审批人] 最关心什么?"
- "他们可能有什么异议?"
- "我可以加入对话吗?"
tactics:
- "提供投资回报率材料"
- "提议高管对高管通话"
- "分享类似客户参考"
- "创建内部支持者演示文稿"
procurement_process:
stages:
rfp_issued:
actions:
- "提前影响需求"
- "理解评估标准"
- "在 RFP 发布前建立关系"
tips:
- "在 RFP 发布前塑造它"
- "定位独特能力"
evaluation:
actions:
- "在所有标准上获得高分"
- "有意义地差异化"
- "清晰地展示价值"
tips:
- "了解评分卡"
- "满足所有要求"
- "主动提供参考"
shortlist:
actions:
- "深入演示"
- "参考电话"
- "概念验证"
tips:
- "个性化以满足其需求"
- "赢得支持者"
- "直接解决顾虑"
negotiation:
actions:
- "商业条款"
- "法律审查"
- "最终定价"
tips:
- "了解他们的限制"
- "准备好权衡方案"
- "不要与自己谈判"
procurement_tactics_response:
competitive_bid:
tactic: "我们正在评估多个供应商"
response: "对您来说最重要的标准是什么?"
counter: "专注于独特价值,而不仅仅是价格"
budget_deadline:
tactic: "我们需要在本季度结束前使用预算"
response: "让我们构建一个可行的方案"
counter: "利用紧迫性但不要过度折扣"
splitting_business:
tactic: "我们考虑在供应商之间拆分业务"
response: "整合节省对您意味着什么?"
counter: "突出多个供应商的总成本"
last_minute_ask:
tactic: "只需要再打 10% 的折扣今天就签"
response: "请帮我理解发生了什么变化"
counter: "交换价值,而不是免费让步"
concession_principles:
never_free:
rule: "每次让步都需要回报"
examples:
- "如果签 3 年期合同,乐意降价 10%"
- "如果您本周签约,我们可以免除设置费"
- "如果按年付款,我可以包含高级支持"
diminishing_size:
pattern: "每次让步都比上一次小"
example:
first: "5% 折扣"
second: "额外 3%"
third: "最终 1%"
message: "表明你已达到极限"
trade_unequal_value:
concept: "给予对你成本低、对他们价值高的东西"
examples:
- "培训(低成本,高价值)"
- "延长的付款条件"
- "额外的用户许可"
- "实施支持"
concession_trades:
if_you_give:
- "更低的价格"
- "延长的付款条件"
- "免费附加组件"
- "免除的费用"
- "额外支持"
ask_for:
- "更长的合同期限"
- "预付款"
- "案例研究/参考"
- "扩大范围"
- "更快的决策"
- "高管支持者"
- "推荐承诺"
closing_approaches:
assumptive_close:
technique: "假设成交,讨论实施"
example: "那么关于入职,您希望先从销售团队还是营销团队开始?"
when: "存在强烈的购买信号时"
alternative_close:
technique: "提供两个积极的选择"
example: "您更喜欢能节省 20% 的年度计划,还是更灵活的季度计划?"
when: "决策是关于‘哪一个’,而不是‘是否’时"
summary_close:
technique: "总结价值并请求承诺"
example: "那么我们已经同意这解决了 [问题],将节省 [金额],并与 [系统] 集成。我们继续推进吗?"
when: "经过彻底的发现和演示后"
urgency_close:
technique: "创造合理的时间压力"
example: "我们本月有实施能力。下一个可用时段将是第二季度。这个时间线可行吗?"
when: "存在真实的截止日期或限制时"
trial_close:
technique: "在询问前测试准备情况"
example: "在 1-10 的范围内,您有多大信心这能解决您的问题?"
when: "不确定异议时"
puppy_dog_close:
technique: "让他们在决定前体验"
example: "为什么不试用 30 天,看看团队是否喜欢?"
when: "产品通过使用自我推销时"
sharp_angle_close:
technique: "将他们的请求转化为承诺"
example: "如果我能为您在第二季度前获得那个功能,我们今天能签约吗?"
when: "他们提出具体请求时"
buying_signals:
verbal:
- "下一步是什么?"
- "我们多快可以开始?"
- "你能发送合同吗?"
- "实施时间线是怎样的?"
- "我们需要让谁参与?"
behavioral:
- "询问详细问题"
- "让额外的利益相关者参与"
- "讨论内部流程"
- "公开比较选项"
- "身体前倾,积极参与"
displacement_strategy:
positioning:
frontal_attack:
when: "在关键标准上具有明显优势"
approach: "在优势上进行直接比较"
flanking:
when: "在特定领域有优势"
approach: "重新构建评估标准"
niche:
when: "具有专业化能力"
approach: "专注于独特用例"
competitive_questions:
discovery:
- "您看过哪些解决方案?"
- "您喜欢当前提供商的哪些方面?"
- "如果可以,您会改变什么?"
- "您的合同什么时候到期?"
positioning:
- "什么会让您考虑替代方案?"
- "当前解决方案缺少什么?"
- "他们在 [你的优势] 方面表现如何?"
handling_competitive_situations:
when_behind:
- "理解他们的评估标准"
- "找到独特的差异化优势"
- "提供概念验证"
- "在组织中向上/向外拓展"
- "专注于长期合作伙伴关系"
when_ahead:
- "不要自满"
- "加速时间线"
- "锁定支持者"
- "解决所有顾虑"
- "明确转换成本"
competitive_landmines:
concept: "暴露竞争对手弱点的问题"
examples:
- "询问 [他们缺乏的功能]"
- "询问 [他们存在的支持问题]"
- "询问 [可扩展性问题]"
- "询问 [安全问题]"
tactics_playbook:
value_creation:
expand_pie:
- "增加服务/支持"
- "捆绑产品"
- "延长关系"
- "建立合作伙伴关系"
trade_across_issues:
- "用价格交换期限"
- "用时间线交换范围"
- "用功能交换参考"
value_claiming:
anchoring_high:
when: "你先提出报价时"
how: "从范围上限开始并给出理由"
silence:
when: "提出报价后"
how: "让他们先回应"
flinching:
when: "他们提出极端要求时"
how: "表示惊讶,请他们解释"
countering_tactics:
good_cop_bad_cop:
recognize: "一个唱红脸,一个唱白脸"
counter: "一起应对,与决策者打交道"
higher_authority:
recognize: "‘我需要和我的老板确认’"
counter: "要求将决策者纳入对话"
nibbling:
recognize: "最后提出小要求"
counter: "将其视为新的谈判"
deadline_pressure:
recognize: "‘今天必须决定’"
counter: "询问如果不决定会发生什么"
每周安装量
45
代码仓库
GitHub 星标数
3
首次出现
2026年1月29日
安全审计
安装于
github-copilot45
gemini-cli44
codex44
kimi-cli44
amp44
opencode44
Expertise in negotiation strategy, procurement navigation, and deal closing techniques.
core_concepts:
batna:
definition: "Best Alternative To Negotiated Agreement"
importance: "Your walk-away power"
develop:
- "Identify all alternatives"
- "Evaluate each option"
- "Strengthen best alternative"
- "Know when to walk away"
zopa:
definition: "Zone of Possible Agreement"
components:
seller_walk_away: "Minimum acceptable price"
buyer_walk_away: "Maximum willing to pay"
zone: "Overlap between the two"
visualization: |
Seller min ----[====ZOPA====]---- Buyer max
^ ^
Ideal outcome zone
anchoring:
definition: "First number sets the range"
tactics:
- "Anchor high when selling"
- "Counter extreme anchors"
- "Use market data to justify"
concession_strategy:
rules:
- "Never concede without getting something"
- "Make concessions smaller over time"
- "Trade items of unequal value"
- "Label your concessions"
negotiation_prep:
know_yourself:
- "Your BATNA (walk-away alternative)"
- "Your target outcome"
- "Your reservation price"
- "Concessions you can offer"
- "Non-negotiables"
know_them:
- "Their likely BATNA"
- "Their constraints (budget, timeline)"
- "Their decision criteria"
- "Who has authority"
- "Personal motivations"
know_the_deal:
- "Market rates/benchmarks"
- "Competitive landscape"
- "Total value (not just price)"
- "Implementation costs"
- "Long-term implications"
preparation_checklist:
before_meeting:
- "[ ] Research company financials"
- "[ ] Understand procurement process"
- "[ ] Map all stakeholders"
- "[ ] Prepare value justification"
- "[ ] Plan concession sequence"
- "[ ] Practice difficult scenarios"
- "[ ] Set target and walk-away"
objection_framework:
acknowledge_explore_respond:
acknowledge: "Show you heard and understand"
explore: "Dig deeper to find real objection"
respond: "Address root cause"
common_objections:
price_too_high:
reframe: "Let's discuss the value relative to investment"
questions:
- "Compared to what?"
- "What's the cost of not solving this?"
- "What ROI would justify this investment?"
tactics:
- "Break down per user/month"
- "Show competitive comparison"
- "Quantify business impact"
- "Offer payment terms"
we_have_budget_constraints:
reframe: "Let's find a solution within your constraints"
questions:
- "What is your budget range?"
- "What could we adjust to fit?"
- "Can budget be shifted from elsewhere?"
tactics:
- "Phased implementation"
- "Reduced scope to start"
- "Different payment structure"
- "Push to next fiscal period"
need_to_think_about_it:
reframe: "Absolutely. Help me understand what you're weighing"
questions:
- "What specifically needs more thought?"
- "What would help you decide?"
- "What's your timeline for decision?"
tactics:
- "Offer to address concerns now"
- "Schedule follow-up call"
- "Send relevant materials"
- "Identify real objection"
using_competitor:
reframe: "Many customers switched from them. Mind if I ask why you chose them?"
questions:
- "What's working well?"
- "What could be better?"
- "When is your renewal?"
tactics:
- "Highlight differentiators"
- "Share switch case studies"
- "Offer pilot alongside"
- "Plant seeds for renewal"
not_the_right_time:
reframe: "When would be better, and why?"
questions:
- "What's happening now?"
- "What needs to change?"
- "What's the cost of waiting?"
tactics:
- "Create urgency"
- "Show risk of delay"
- "Offer to start small"
- "Book future follow-up"
need_approval:
reframe: "Makes sense. How can I help you make the case?"
questions:
- "What does [approver] care about most?"
- "What objections might they have?"
- "Can I join the conversation?"
tactics:
- "Provide ROI materials"
- "Offer exec-to-exec call"
- "Share similar customer references"
- "Create internal champion deck"
procurement_process:
stages:
rfp_issued:
actions:
- "Influence requirements upfront"
- "Understand evaluation criteria"
- "Build relationships pre-RFP"
tips:
- "Shape the RFP before it's issued"
- "Position unique capabilities"
evaluation:
actions:
- "Score well on all criteria"
- "Differentiate meaningfully"
- "Demonstrate value clearly"
tips:
- "Know the scorecard"
- "Address all requirements"
- "Provide references proactively"
shortlist:
actions:
- "Deep dive demos"
- "Reference calls"
- "Proof of concept"
tips:
- "Personalize to their needs"
- "Win the champion"
- "Address concerns directly"
negotiation:
actions:
- "Commercial terms"
- "Legal review"
- "Final pricing"
tips:
- "Know their constraints"
- "Have trade-offs ready"
- "Don't negotiate against yourself"
procurement_tactics_response:
competitive_bid:
tactic: "We're evaluating multiple vendors"
response: "What criteria matter most to you?"
counter: "Focus on unique value, not just price"
budget_deadline:
tactic: "We need to use budget by end of quarter"
response: "Let's structure something that works"
counter: "Use urgency but don't over-discount"
splitting_business:
tactic: "We're thinking of splitting between vendors"
response: "What would consolidation savings mean to you?"
counter: "Highlight total cost of multiple vendors"
last_minute_ask:
tactic: "Just need 10% more discount to sign today"
response: "Help me understand what changed"
counter: "Trade for value, not free concession"
concession_principles:
never_free:
rule: "Every concession requires something in return"
examples:
- "Happy to reduce price by 10% for 3-year term"
- "We can waive setup fee if you sign this week"
- "I can include premium support for annual payment"
diminishing_size:
pattern: "Each concession smaller than the last"
example:
first: "5% discount"
second: "3% additional"
third: "1% final"
message: "Signals you're reaching limit"
trade_unequal_value:
concept: "Give what's cheap to you, valuable to them"
examples:
- "Training (low cost, high value)"
- "Extended payment terms"
- "Additional user licenses"
- "Implementation support"
concession_trades:
if_you_give:
- "Lower price"
- "Extended payment terms"
- "Free add-ons"
- "Waived fees"
- "Extra support"
ask_for:
- "Longer contract term"
- "Upfront payment"
- "Case study/reference"
- "Expanded scope"
- "Faster decision"
- "Executive sponsor"
- "Referral commitment"
closing_approaches:
assumptive_close:
technique: "Assume the sale, discuss implementation"
example: "So for onboarding, would you prefer to start
with the sales team or marketing team first?"
when: "Strong buying signals present"
alternative_close:
technique: "Offer two positive options"
example: "Would you prefer the annual plan with 20% savings,
or the quarterly plan for flexibility?"
when: "Decision is about 'which', not 'if'"
summary_close:
technique: "Recap value and ask for commitment"
example: "So we've agreed this solves [problem], will save
[amount], and integrates with [system].
Shall we move forward?"
when: "After thorough discovery and demo"
urgency_close:
technique: "Create legitimate time pressure"
example: "We have capacity for implementation this month.
Next available slot would be Q2.
Does this timeline work?"
when: "Real deadline or constraint exists"
trial_close:
technique: "Test readiness before asking"
example: "On a scale of 1-10, how confident are you
this solves your problem?"
when: "Uncertain about objections"
puppy_dog_close:
technique: "Let them experience before deciding"
example: "Why don't you try it for 30 days and see
how the team likes it?"
when: "Product sells itself through use"
sharp_angle_close:
technique: "Turn their request into commitment"
example: "If I can get you that feature by Q2,
can we sign today?"
when: "They make a specific request"
buying_signals:
verbal:
- "What are the next steps?"
- "How soon can we start?"
- "Can you send the contract?"
- "What's the implementation timeline?"
- "Who do we need to involve?"
behavioral:
- "Asking detailed questions"
- "Involving additional stakeholders"
- "Discussing internal processes"
- "Comparing options openly"
- "Leaning in, engaged"
displacement_strategy:
positioning:
frontal_attack:
when: "Clear superiority on key criteria"
approach: "Direct comparison on strengths"
flanking:
when: "Strength in specific area"
approach: "Reframe evaluation criteria"
niche:
when: "Specialized capability"
approach: "Focus on unique use case"
competitive_questions:
discovery:
- "What solutions have you looked at?"
- "What do you like about your current provider?"
- "What would you change if you could?"
- "When is your contract up?"
positioning:
- "What would make you consider alternatives?"
- "What's missing from current solution?"
- "How do they compare on [your strength]?"
handling_competitive_situations:
when_behind:
- "Understand their evaluation criteria"
- "Find unique differentiator"
- "Offer proof of concept"
- "Go higher/wider in organization"
- "Focus on long-term partnership"
when_ahead:
- "Don't get complacent"
- "Accelerate timeline"
- "Lock in champion"
- "Address all concerns"
- "Make switching cost clear"
competitive_landmines:
concept: "Questions that expose competitor weakness"
examples:
- "Ask about [feature they lack]"
- "Ask about [support issue they have]"
- "Ask about [scalability problem]"
- "Ask about [security concern]"
tactics_playbook:
value_creation:
expand_pie:
- "Add services/support"
- "Bundle products"
- "Extend relationship"
- "Create partnership"
trade_across_issues:
- "Trade price for term"
- "Trade timeline for scope"
- "Trade features for references"
value_claiming:
anchoring_high:
when: "You're presenting first"
how: "Start at top of range with justification"
silence:
when: "After making offer"
how: "Let them respond first"
flinching:
when: "They make extreme ask"
how: "Express surprise, ask them to explain"
countering_tactics:
good_cop_bad_cop:
recognize: "One nice, one aggressive"
counter: "Address both together, deal with decision maker"
higher_authority:
recognize: "'I need to check with my boss'"
counter: "Ask to include authority in conversation"
nibbling:
recognize: "Small asks at the end"
counter: "Treat as new negotiation"
deadline_pressure:
recognize: "'Must decide today'"
counter: "Ask what happens if you don't"
Weekly Installs
45
Repository
GitHub Stars
3
First Seen
Jan 29, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPass
Installed on
github-copilot45
gemini-cli44
codex44
kimi-cli44
amp44
opencode44
新员工入职引导指南:14位专家分享30-60-90天计划与高效入职方法
794 周安装